Awakening and Breathing Coordination: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Determinants of Implementation.

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Annals of the American Thoracic Society Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202212-1048OC
Griffin H Olsen, Perry M Gee, Doug Wolfe, Carrie Winberg, Lori Carpenter, Chris Jones, Jason R Jacobs, Lindsay Leither, Ithan D Peltan, Sara J Singer, Steven M Asch, Colin K Grissom, Rajendu Srivastava, Andrew J Knighton
{"title":"Awakening and Breathing Coordination: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Determinants of Implementation.","authors":"Griffin H Olsen, Perry M Gee, Doug Wolfe, Carrie Winberg, Lori Carpenter, Chris Jones, Jason R Jacobs, Lindsay Leither, Ithan D Peltan, Sara J Singer, Steven M Asch, Colin K Grissom, Rajendu Srivastava, Andrew J Knighton","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202212-1048OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Routine spontaneous awakening and breathing trial coordination (SAT/SBT) improves outcomes for mechanically ventilated patients, but adherence varies. Understanding barriers to and facilitators of consistent daily use of SAT/SBT (implementation determinants) can guide the development of implementation strategies to increase adherence to these evidence-based interventions. <b>Objectives:</b> We conducted an explanatory, sequential mixed-methods study to measure variation in the routine daily use of SAT/SBT and to identify implementation determinants that might explain variation in SAT/SBT use across 15 intensive care units (ICUs) in urban and rural locations within an integrated, community-based health system. <b>Methods:</b> We described the patient population and measured adherence to daily use of coordinated SAT/SBT from January to June 2021, selecting four sites with varied adherence levels for semistructured field interviews. We conducted key informant interviews with critical care nurses, respiratory therapists, and physicians/advanced practice clinicians (<i>n</i> = 55) from these four sites between October and December 2021 and performed content analysis to identify implementation determinants of SAT/SBT use. <b>Results:</b> The 15 sites had 1,901 ICU admissions receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for ⩾24 hours during the measurement period. The mean IMV patient age was 58 years, and the median IMV duration was 5.3 days (interquartile range, 2.5-11.9). Coordinated SAT/SBT adherence (within 2 h) was estimated at 21% systemwide (site range, 9-68%). ICU clinicians were generally familiar with SAT/SBT but varied in their knowledge and beliefs about what constituted an evidence-based SAT/SBT. Clinicians reported that SAT/SBT coordination was difficult in the context of existing ICU workflows, and existing protocols did not explicitly define how coordination should be performed. The lack of an agreed-upon system-level measure for tracking daily use of SAT/SBT led to uncertainty regarding what constituted adherence. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic increased clinician workloads, impacting performance. <b>Conclusions:</b> Coordinated SAT/SBT adherence varied substantially across 15 ICUs within an integrated, community-based health system. Implementation strategies that address barriers identified by this study, including knowledge deficits, challenges regarding workflow coordination, and the lack of performance measurement, should be tested in future hybrid implementation-effectiveness trials to increase adherence to daily use of coordinated SAT/SBT and minimize harm related to the prolonged use of mechanical ventilation and sedation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8018,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"1483-1490"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10559139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202212-1048OC","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Routine spontaneous awakening and breathing trial coordination (SAT/SBT) improves outcomes for mechanically ventilated patients, but adherence varies. Understanding barriers to and facilitators of consistent daily use of SAT/SBT (implementation determinants) can guide the development of implementation strategies to increase adherence to these evidence-based interventions. Objectives: We conducted an explanatory, sequential mixed-methods study to measure variation in the routine daily use of SAT/SBT and to identify implementation determinants that might explain variation in SAT/SBT use across 15 intensive care units (ICUs) in urban and rural locations within an integrated, community-based health system. Methods: We described the patient population and measured adherence to daily use of coordinated SAT/SBT from January to June 2021, selecting four sites with varied adherence levels for semistructured field interviews. We conducted key informant interviews with critical care nurses, respiratory therapists, and physicians/advanced practice clinicians (n = 55) from these four sites between October and December 2021 and performed content analysis to identify implementation determinants of SAT/SBT use. Results: The 15 sites had 1,901 ICU admissions receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for ⩾24 hours during the measurement period. The mean IMV patient age was 58 years, and the median IMV duration was 5.3 days (interquartile range, 2.5-11.9). Coordinated SAT/SBT adherence (within 2 h) was estimated at 21% systemwide (site range, 9-68%). ICU clinicians were generally familiar with SAT/SBT but varied in their knowledge and beliefs about what constituted an evidence-based SAT/SBT. Clinicians reported that SAT/SBT coordination was difficult in the context of existing ICU workflows, and existing protocols did not explicitly define how coordination should be performed. The lack of an agreed-upon system-level measure for tracking daily use of SAT/SBT led to uncertainty regarding what constituted adherence. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic increased clinician workloads, impacting performance. Conclusions: Coordinated SAT/SBT adherence varied substantially across 15 ICUs within an integrated, community-based health system. Implementation strategies that address barriers identified by this study, including knowledge deficits, challenges regarding workflow coordination, and the lack of performance measurement, should be tested in future hybrid implementation-effectiveness trials to increase adherence to daily use of coordinated SAT/SBT and minimize harm related to the prolonged use of mechanical ventilation and sedation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
觉醒与呼吸协调:执行决定因素的混合方法分析。
理由:常规自发觉醒和呼吸试验协调(SAT/SBT)可改善机械通气患者的预后,但依从性各不相同。了解持续日常使用SAT/SBT(实施决定因素)的障碍和促进因素,可以指导制定实施战略,以提高对这些循证干预措施的依从性。目的:我们进行了一项解释性的、连续的混合方法研究,以测量SAT/SBT日常使用的变化,并确定可能解释在一个综合的、基于社区的卫生系统中,城市和农村地区15个重症监护室(ICU)SAT/SBT使用变化的实施决定因素。方法:我们描述了2021年1月至6月的患者群体,并测量了每天使用协调SAT/SBT的依从性,选择了四个依从性水平不同的地点进行半结构现场访谈。我们对重症监护护士、呼吸治疗师和医生/高级实践临床医生进行了关键的信息提供者访谈(n = 55),并进行内容分析,以确定SAT/SBT使用的实施决定因素。结果:在测量期间,15个地点有1901名ICU患者接受了24小时的有创机械通气(IMV)。IMV患者的平均年龄为58岁,中位IMV持续时间为5.3天(四分位间距,2.5-11.9)。据估计,全系统协调SAT/SBT依从性(2小时内)为21%(位点范围,9-68%)。ICU临床医生通常熟悉SAT/SBT,但他们对什么构成循证SAT/SBT的知识和信念各不相同。临床医生报告说,在现有ICU工作流程的背景下,SAT/SBT的协调很困难,而且现有的协议没有明确定义应如何进行协调。由于缺乏一个商定的系统级措施来跟踪SAT/SBT的日常使用,导致了关于遵守的不确定性。新冠肺炎大流行的影响增加了临床医生的工作量,影响了绩效。结论:在一个以社区为基础的综合卫生系统中,15个重症监护室的协调SAT/SBT依从性差异很大。解决本研究确定的障碍的实施策略,包括知识缺陷、工作流程协调方面的挑战以及缺乏绩效衡量,应在未来的混合实施有效性试验中进行测试,以提高对协调SAT/SBT日常使用的依从性,并最大限度地减少与长期使用机械通气和镇静有关的伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Annals of the American Thoracic Society Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Annals of the American Thoracic Society (AnnalsATS) is the official international online journal of the American Thoracic Society. Formerly known as PATS, it provides comprehensive and authoritative coverage of a wide range of topics in adult and pediatric pulmonary medicine, respiratory sleep medicine, and adult medical critical care. As a leading journal in its field, AnnalsATS offers up-to-date and reliable information that is directly applicable to clinical practice. It serves as a valuable resource for clinical specialists, supporting their formative and continuing education. Additionally, the journal is committed to promoting public health by publishing research and articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in these fields.
期刊最新文献
Disparities in Discharge Support Provided to Patients Leaving 'Before Medically Advised' from Hospitalization for COPD Exacerbation. Morphological Prediction of CPAP Associated Acute Respiratory Instability. The Impact of Age of Diagnosis in Children with Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia. Rural Residence, Tobacco Use, and Nationwide COPD Prevalence: Analyses from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Further Insight into the Association of Long-Term Particulate Matter Exposure and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1