Comparison of the effects of open and closed aspiration on end-expiratory lung volume in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-22 DOI:10.4097/kja.23194
Süleyman Yildirim, Saba Mukaddes Saygili, Onur Süneçli, Cenk Kirakli
{"title":"Comparison of the effects of open and closed aspiration on end-expiratory lung volume in acute respiratory distress syndrome.","authors":"Süleyman Yildirim, Saba Mukaddes Saygili, Onur Süneçli, Cenk Kirakli","doi":"10.4097/kja.23194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alveoli tend to collapse in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Endotracheal aspiration may increase alveolar collapse due to the loss of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV). We aimed to compare the loss of EELV after open and closed suction in patients with ARDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized crossover study included 20 patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for ARDS. Open and closed suction were applied in a random order. Lung impedance was measured using electric impedance tomography. The change in end-expiratory lung impedance end of suction and at 1, 10, 20, and 30 min after suction, was used to represent the change in EELV. Arterial blood gas analyses and ventilatory parameters such as the plateau pressure (Pplat), driving pressure (Pdrive), and compliance of the respiratory system (CRS) were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Less volume loss was noted after closed suction than after open suction (mean ΔEELI: -2661 ± 1937 vs. -4415 ± 2363; mean difference: -1753; 95% CI [-2662, -844]; P = 0.001). EELI returned to baseline 10 min after closed suction but did not return to baseline even 30 min after open suction. After closed suction, the Pplat and Pdrive decreased while the CRS increased. Conversely, the Pplat and Pdrive increased while the CRS decreased after open suction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endotracheal aspiration may result in alveolar collapse due to loss of EELV. Given that closed suction is associated with less volume loss at end-expiration without worsening ventilatory parameters, it should be chosen over open suction in patients with ARDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10834727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.23194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alveoli tend to collapse in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Endotracheal aspiration may increase alveolar collapse due to the loss of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV). We aimed to compare the loss of EELV after open and closed suction in patients with ARDS.

Methods: This randomized crossover study included 20 patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for ARDS. Open and closed suction were applied in a random order. Lung impedance was measured using electric impedance tomography. The change in end-expiratory lung impedance end of suction and at 1, 10, 20, and 30 min after suction, was used to represent the change in EELV. Arterial blood gas analyses and ventilatory parameters such as the plateau pressure (Pplat), driving pressure (Pdrive), and compliance of the respiratory system (CRS) were also recorded.

Results: Less volume loss was noted after closed suction than after open suction (mean ΔEELI: -2661 ± 1937 vs. -4415 ± 2363; mean difference: -1753; 95% CI [-2662, -844]; P = 0.001). EELI returned to baseline 10 min after closed suction but did not return to baseline even 30 min after open suction. After closed suction, the Pplat and Pdrive decreased while the CRS increased. Conversely, the Pplat and Pdrive increased while the CRS decreased after open suction.

Conclusions: Endotracheal aspiration may result in alveolar collapse due to loss of EELV. Given that closed suction is associated with less volume loss at end-expiration without worsening ventilatory parameters, it should be chosen over open suction in patients with ARDS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较开放式吸气和封闭式吸气对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者呼气末肺容量的影响。
背景:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的肺泡容易塌陷。气管内吸痰可能会因呼气末肺容积(EELV)的损失而加重肺泡塌陷。我们的目的是比较 ARDS 患者在开放式和封闭式抽吸后 EELV 的损失:这项随机交叉研究纳入了 20 名接受有创机械通气治疗的 ARDS 患者。以随机顺序进行开放式和封闭式抽吸。使用电阻抗断层扫描测量肺阻抗。抽吸结束后以及抽吸后 1、10、20 和 30 分钟时呼气末肺阻抗的变化被用来表示 EELV 的变化。此外,还记录了动脉血气分析和通气参数,如高原压(Pplat)、驱动压(Pdrive)和呼吸系统顺应性(CRS):结果:与开放式抽吸相比,闭合式抽吸后的血容量损失较少(平均 ΔEELI: -2661 ± 1937 vs. -4415 ± 2363; 平均差异:-1753; 95% Ci:-1753;95% CI [-2662,-844];P = 0.001)。EELI 在闭合抽吸 10 分钟后恢复到基线,但在开放抽吸 30 分钟后仍未恢复到基线。封闭抽吸后,Pplat 和 Pdrive 下降,而 CRS 上升。相反,开放抽吸后,Pplat 和 Pdrive 增加,而 CRS 减少:结论:气管内抽吸可能会因 EELV 损失而导致肺泡塌陷。结论:气管内抽吸可能会因 EELV 损失而导致肺泡塌陷,鉴于闭式抽吸可减少呼气末的容积损失而不会导致通气参数恶化,因此在 ARDS 患者中应选择闭式抽吸而非开放式抽吸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive guidelines for appropriate statistical analysis methods in research. Effects of opioid-sparing general anesthesia on postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Reverse tube direction and epistaxis in left nasotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. Ramped versus sniffing position for Ambu® AuraGain™ insertion in patients with obesity: a randomized controlled study. Comment on "The incidences of nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia with remimazolam versus sevoflurane: a prospective randomized controlled trial".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1