Satisfaction and Experience of Women with Breast Cancer Screening Services in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Ameerah Abdulmohsen Alrossais, Mustafa Ahmed Alshihri, Nasser Sulaiman Alsubaihi, Lolowh Mohammed Almoheteb, Hagir Mohammed Bakhiet, Muna Hassan Hassanein
{"title":"Satisfaction and Experience of Women with Breast Cancer Screening Services in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Ameerah Abdulmohsen Alrossais, Mustafa Ahmed Alshihri, Nasser Sulaiman Alsubaihi, Lolowh Mohammed Almoheteb, Hagir Mohammed Bakhiet, Muna Hassan Hassanein","doi":"10.5455/msm.2023.35.129-134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Satisfaction of women with breast cancer screening programs is important to ensure the program effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the experience and satisfaction of women with breast cancer screening services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a descriptive study targeting 312 women undergoing mammography screening in Riyadh Region in Saudi Arabia. The data were collected through telephone interviews using a structured questionnaire covering eight domains. Weighted means were calculated by dividing the average scores for each item and domain by their maximum scores. Multiple regression was performed to identify the factors related to general satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall satisfaction weighted mean was 0.879. Experiences were best for physical surroundings and perceived competency of staff domains with weighted means of 0.929 and 0.914 respectively. Accessibility and waiting time, and staff interpersonal skills domains came next with weighted means of 0.901 and 0.876 respectively. Information transfer, physical discomfort and psychological discomfort domains came last with weighted means of 0.783, 0.736 and 0.673 respectively. General satisfaction was related to waiting time and access domain (Exp(B) =.709 (95% CI: .595-.843, p value: .000), staff interpersonal skills domain (Exp(B) = .815 (95% CI: .686- .968, p value: .020) and perceived competency of the staff domain (Exp(B) = .660 (95% CI: .458- .951, p value: .026).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall satisfaction with breast cancer screening was high and the experience of women was highly positive for most of the domains. More efforts are needed to improve the information transfer by addressing the language barriers and to enhance the physical and psychological experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":18358,"journal":{"name":"Materia Socio-Medica","volume":"35 2","pages":"129-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8a/9c/MSM-35-124.PMC10495151.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materia Socio-Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2023.35.129-134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Satisfaction of women with breast cancer screening programs is important to ensure the program effectiveness.

Objective: To assess the experience and satisfaction of women with breast cancer screening services.

Methods: This was a descriptive study targeting 312 women undergoing mammography screening in Riyadh Region in Saudi Arabia. The data were collected through telephone interviews using a structured questionnaire covering eight domains. Weighted means were calculated by dividing the average scores for each item and domain by their maximum scores. Multiple regression was performed to identify the factors related to general satisfaction.

Results: Overall satisfaction weighted mean was 0.879. Experiences were best for physical surroundings and perceived competency of staff domains with weighted means of 0.929 and 0.914 respectively. Accessibility and waiting time, and staff interpersonal skills domains came next with weighted means of 0.901 and 0.876 respectively. Information transfer, physical discomfort and psychological discomfort domains came last with weighted means of 0.783, 0.736 and 0.673 respectively. General satisfaction was related to waiting time and access domain (Exp(B) =.709 (95% CI: .595-.843, p value: .000), staff interpersonal skills domain (Exp(B) = .815 (95% CI: .686- .968, p value: .020) and perceived competency of the staff domain (Exp(B) = .660 (95% CI: .458- .951, p value: .026).

Conclusions: Overall satisfaction with breast cancer screening was high and the experience of women was highly positive for most of the domains. More efforts are needed to improve the information transfer by addressing the language barriers and to enhance the physical and psychological experiences.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯利雅得妇女对癌症筛查服务的满意度和经验。
背景:女性对癌症筛查项目的满意度是确保项目有效性的重要因素。目的:评价癌症乳腺筛查服务的经验和满意度。方法:这是一项针对沙特阿拉伯利雅得地区312名接受乳房X光检查的女性的描述性研究。数据是通过电话采访收集的,使用了一份涵盖八个领域的结构化问卷。加权平均数是通过将每个项目和领域的平均得分除以其最大得分来计算的。进行多元回归以确定与总体满意度相关的因素。结果:总体满意度加权平均值为0.879。体验对物理环境和工作人员领域的感知能力最好,加权平均值分别为0.929和0.914。其次是可达性和等待时间以及员工人际交往技能领域,加权平均值分别为0.901和0.876。信息传递、身体不适和心理不适领域的加权平均值分别为0.783、0.736和0.673。总体满意度与等待时间和访问域有关(Exp(B)=.709(95%CI:.595-.843,p值:.000),员工人际交往技能领域(Exp(B)=.815(95%CI:.686-.968,p值:.020)和员工领域感知能力(Exp)=.660(95%CI:.458-.951,p值为.226)。需要做出更多努力,通过解决语言障碍来改善信息传递,并增强身体和心理体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Compassion Fatigue and Compassion Satisfaction in Pediatric Intensive Care Professionals. The Evaluation of Intestinal Permeability in Preeclamptic Pregnancy. Acquisition of New Philips Affiniti 30 Vascular Color Doppler Ultrasound Device - Cost Benefit Analysis to Reduce Cardiosurgical Patients' Treatment. Behavioral and Knowledge Patterns Regarding the Use of Antibiotics Among Urban and Rural Population in Bosnia and Herzegovina-a Cross-sectional Study. Domestic Violence During Women's Life in Developing Countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1