Predicting Survival Outcomes in Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome: The Impact of Combined Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score and Serum Lactate Measurement.

SooHyun Kim, HeeWon Yang, BangShill Rhee, Hakyoon Song, HyukHoon Kim
{"title":"Predicting Survival Outcomes in Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome: The Impact of Combined Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score and Serum Lactate Measurement.","authors":"SooHyun Kim,&nbsp;HeeWon Yang,&nbsp;BangShill Rhee,&nbsp;Hakyoon Song,&nbsp;HyukHoon Kim","doi":"10.12659/MSM.942119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) is a major concern and shares pathophysiology with sepsis. Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores and serum lactate levels, as suggested in the Survival Sepsis Guidelines, have shown significant predictive value for prognosis in patients with sepsis. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate combined use of the SOFA score and serum lactate measurement on survival prognosis in PCAS. MATERIAL AND METHODS Our study included patients with return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest who were age >18 years and underwent targeted temperature management. The 438 patients were allocated to a surviving group and a deceased group at discharge. Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate any association with SOFA scores, serum lactate levels, and survival. To evaluate the predictive value of regression models, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was assessed. RESULTS Lower SOFA score and serum lactate level were associated with better survival rates in the post-cardiac arrest patients (SOFA score: odds ratio (OR), 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.67-0.88; P<0.001; lactate level: OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.81-0.94; P<0.001). The combined model of the SOFA score and serum lactate level was superior to models including either SOFA score or serum lactate level alone in predicting survival (AUROC, 0.86 vs 0.83, P=0.028, 0.86 vs 0.81, P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS Because of the superiority of the combined model of SOFA score and serum lactate level, combining these 2 factors could improve prediction of prognosis and survival outcomes in PCAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":18276,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research","volume":"29 ","pages":"e942119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7b/55/medscimonit-29-e942119.PMC10508085.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.942119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) is a major concern and shares pathophysiology with sepsis. Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores and serum lactate levels, as suggested in the Survival Sepsis Guidelines, have shown significant predictive value for prognosis in patients with sepsis. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate combined use of the SOFA score and serum lactate measurement on survival prognosis in PCAS. MATERIAL AND METHODS Our study included patients with return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest who were age >18 years and underwent targeted temperature management. The 438 patients were allocated to a surviving group and a deceased group at discharge. Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate any association with SOFA scores, serum lactate levels, and survival. To evaluate the predictive value of regression models, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was assessed. RESULTS Lower SOFA score and serum lactate level were associated with better survival rates in the post-cardiac arrest patients (SOFA score: odds ratio (OR), 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.67-0.88; P<0.001; lactate level: OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.81-0.94; P<0.001). The combined model of the SOFA score and serum lactate level was superior to models including either SOFA score or serum lactate level alone in predicting survival (AUROC, 0.86 vs 0.83, P=0.028, 0.86 vs 0.81, P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS Because of the superiority of the combined model of SOFA score and serum lactate level, combining these 2 factors could improve prediction of prognosis and survival outcomes in PCAS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测心脏骤停后综合征的生存结果:联合序贯器官衰竭评估评分和血清乳酸测定的影响。
背景心脏骤停后综合征(PCAS)是一个主要关注点,与败血症有共同的病理生理学。根据《脓毒症生存指南》的建议,序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分和血清乳酸水平对脓毒症患者的预后具有显著的预测价值。本回顾性研究旨在评估SOFA评分和血清乳酸测量对PCAS患者生存预后的联合应用。材料和方法我们的研究包括年龄>18岁并接受有针对性的体温管理的心脏骤停后自发循环恢复的患者。438名患者在出院时被分为存活组和死亡组。使用多变量回归模型来评估与SOFA评分、血清乳酸水平和生存率的任何关联。为了评估回归模型的预测价值,评估了受试者工作特征曲线(AUROC)下的面积。结果心脏骤停后患者SOFA评分和血清乳酸水平越低,生存率越高(SOFA评分:比值比(OR)为0.77;95%置信区间为0.67-0.88;P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Foot Structure in Preschool Children Based on Body Mass. The Role of Copper-Induced M2 Macrophage Polarization in Protecting Cartilage Matrix in Osteoarthritis. Predicting Acute Cardiovascular Complications in COVID-19: Insights from a Specialized Cardiac Referral Department. Comparative Analysis of Transoral Endoscopic Parathyroidectomy Vestibular Approach and Focused Open Surgery for Primary Hyperparathyroidism Treatment: A Single Center Experience Errate: Enhanced Patient Comfort and Satisfaction with Early Oral Feeding after Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Resection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1