A systematic review of simulation training for lower extremity bypass procedures.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vascular Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-26 DOI:10.1177/17085381231192689
Nadeem Ahmed Siddiqui, Aden Javed, Ammar Pirzada
{"title":"A systematic review of simulation training for lower extremity bypass procedures.","authors":"Nadeem Ahmed Siddiqui, Aden Javed, Ammar Pirzada","doi":"10.1177/17085381231192689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Simulation is used across surgical specialties for skill enhancement. The choice and assessment method of a simulator varies across literature. In the age of endovascular approach, trainees have limited exposure to open lower limb bypass procedures which needs attention. This review aims to assess the utility of simulation training in lower limb bypass surgery using Kirkpatrick's model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using PRISMA statement, we included all the studies done on simulators in lower limb bypass surgical procedures for this systematic review. The primary outcome was to assess the effectiveness of different types of simulation used for lower limb bypass surgery using the Kirkpatrick's model for training evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An initial search identified 295 articles out of which 7 articles were found to be eligible for this systematic review. A variety of simulators were used including cadavers and synthetic models. Most studies (<i>n</i>=5) found the use of simulation as an effective tool in achieving technical competence. All the five studies we found at level 2 on Kirpatrick's model evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the existing studies are at level 2 of Kirkpatrick's model which reflects learning changes in trainees after simulation. Feedback mechanism needs to be evolved where the improvement after simulation training can be gauged by its replication in clinical practice and improved patient care practices corresponding to the highest level of Kirkpatrick's model.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"1075-1082"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381231192689","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Simulation is used across surgical specialties for skill enhancement. The choice and assessment method of a simulator varies across literature. In the age of endovascular approach, trainees have limited exposure to open lower limb bypass procedures which needs attention. This review aims to assess the utility of simulation training in lower limb bypass surgery using Kirkpatrick's model.

Methods: Using PRISMA statement, we included all the studies done on simulators in lower limb bypass surgical procedures for this systematic review. The primary outcome was to assess the effectiveness of different types of simulation used for lower limb bypass surgery using the Kirkpatrick's model for training evaluation.

Results: An initial search identified 295 articles out of which 7 articles were found to be eligible for this systematic review. A variety of simulators were used including cadavers and synthetic models. Most studies (n=5) found the use of simulation as an effective tool in achieving technical competence. All the five studies we found at level 2 on Kirpatrick's model evaluation.

Conclusion: Most of the existing studies are at level 2 of Kirkpatrick's model which reflects learning changes in trainees after simulation. Feedback mechanism needs to be evolved where the improvement after simulation training can be gauged by its replication in clinical practice and improved patient care practices corresponding to the highest level of Kirkpatrick's model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢搭桥手术模拟训练系统回顾。
目的:各外科专业都使用模拟器来提高技能。不同文献对模拟器的选择和评估方法各不相同。在采用血管内方法的时代,受训者接触开放式下肢搭桥手术的机会有限,这需要引起重视。本综述旨在使用 Kirkpatrick 模型评估下肢搭桥手术模拟训练的实用性:方法:我们采用 PRISMA 声明,将所有关于下肢搭桥手术模拟器的研究纳入本系统性综述。主要结果是使用柯克帕特里克模型对下肢搭桥手术中使用的不同类型模拟器的有效性进行培训评估:初步搜索发现了 295 篇文章,其中有 7 篇文章符合本系统综述的要求。所使用的模拟器多种多样,包括尸体和合成模型。大多数研究(n=5)发现模拟是实现技术能力的有效工具。我们发现所有五项研究在 Kirpatrick 模型评估中都处于 2 级水平:现有的大多数研究都处于 Kirkpatrick 模型的第 2 级,反映了学员在模拟后的学习变化。需要建立反馈机制,通过在临床实践中复制模拟训练和改进病人护理实践来衡量模拟训练后的进步,这与柯帕崔克模型的最高级别相对应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
期刊最新文献
Long-term outcomes of carotid endarterectomy with eversion technique in patients with an open circle of Willis: A multicenter registry study. Intercostal bypass graft pseudoaneurysm repaired with percutaneous glue embolization utilizing CT needle guidance: A case report. A novel non-pneumatic compression device results in reduced foot and ankle swelling in patients with venous and lymphatic edema. Reliability of a portable toe pressure photoplethysmography device compared to a stationary laser doppler flowmeter. Association between statin-use and mobility and long-term survival after major lower limb amputation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1