Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Training Program.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-24 DOI:10.1027/0227-5910/a000917
Ryan M Hill, Paige Picou, Zain Hussain, Blake A Vieyra, Kaylee M Perkins
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Training Program.","authors":"Ryan M Hill, Paige Picou, Zain Hussain, Blake A Vieyra, Kaylee M Perkins","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Suicide prevention gatekeeper training programs offer a unique opportunity to increase knowledge about suicide prevention, enhance risk identification, and reduce suicide-related stigma. <i>Aims:</i> This study evaluated the efficacy of an online suicide prevention gatekeeper training program in a randomized trial. <i>Method:</i> Participants were US college students (<i>N</i> = 388). Participants (69.3% women) had a mean age of 19.01 years and identified primarily as Hispanic/Latinx (52.1%) and non-Hispanic White (22.4%). Participants completed pre- and posttest surveys and were randomly assigned to either the ASK About Suicide to Save a Life (AS + K?) suicide prevention gatekeeper training program or an information-only comparison intervention. <i>Results:</i> Participants in the AS + K? condition reported significantly greater gatekeeper preparedness and self-efficacy, and lower stigmatized attitudes at posttraining, as compared with those in the comparison condition. There were no significant differences in likelihood of using gatekeeper skills or suicide-related knowledge across groups. <i>Limitations:</i> This short-term study was not able to assess behavioral change resulting in use of gatekeeper skills over time. <i>Conclusions:</i> Completion of gatekeeper training resulted in increases in preparedness and self-efficacy for engaging in gatekeeper behaviors, as well as a reduction in suicide-related stigma. Despite small intervention effects, the online AS + K? training appears to be a promising program.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"57-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000917","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Suicide prevention gatekeeper training programs offer a unique opportunity to increase knowledge about suicide prevention, enhance risk identification, and reduce suicide-related stigma. Aims: This study evaluated the efficacy of an online suicide prevention gatekeeper training program in a randomized trial. Method: Participants were US college students (N = 388). Participants (69.3% women) had a mean age of 19.01 years and identified primarily as Hispanic/Latinx (52.1%) and non-Hispanic White (22.4%). Participants completed pre- and posttest surveys and were randomly assigned to either the ASK About Suicide to Save a Life (AS + K?) suicide prevention gatekeeper training program or an information-only comparison intervention. Results: Participants in the AS + K? condition reported significantly greater gatekeeper preparedness and self-efficacy, and lower stigmatized attitudes at posttraining, as compared with those in the comparison condition. There were no significant differences in likelihood of using gatekeeper skills or suicide-related knowledge across groups. Limitations: This short-term study was not able to assess behavioral change resulting in use of gatekeeper skills over time. Conclusions: Completion of gatekeeper training resulted in increases in preparedness and self-efficacy for engaging in gatekeeper behaviors, as well as a reduction in suicide-related stigma. Despite small intervention effects, the online AS + K? training appears to be a promising program.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线自杀预防看门人培训项目的随机对照试验。
背景:自杀预防把关人培训项目为增加自杀预防知识、提高风险识别能力和减少自杀相关污名化提供了一个独特的机会。目的:本研究通过随机试验评估了在线自杀预防守门人培训项目的效果。方法:参与者为美国大学生(N:参与者为美国大学生(N = 388)。参与者(69.3% 为女性)的平均年龄为 19.01 岁,主要身份为西班牙裔/拉丁裔(52.1%)和非西班牙裔白人(22.4%)。参与者完成了测试前和测试后的调查,并被随机分配到 "ASK About Suicide to Save a Life"(AS + K?)自杀预防守门人培训项目或仅提供信息的对比干预项目中。结果:与对照组相比,AS + K?条件下的参与者在培训后的守门人准备程度和自我效能感明显提高,污名化态度明显降低。各组在使用守门人技能或自杀相关知识的可能性方面没有明显差异。局限性:这项短期研究无法评估随着时间的推移使用把关人技能的行为变化。结论:完成守门人培训后,参与守门人行为的准备程度和自我效能都有所提高,与自杀相关的耻辱感也有所减少。尽管干预效果较小,但在线 AS + K? 培训似乎是一个很有前景的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
期刊最新文献
The Prevalence of Suicidal Ideation According to Occupation and Other Employment Variables. Perceived Effectiveness of Components of Interventions to Support People Bereaved By Suicide. Exploring the Influence of Masculine Norms on Suicidal Ideation and Help-Seeking Behavior. Substitution of Methods in Suicide Deaths - Firearm Injury and Hanging. Using Real-Time Coronial Data to Detect Spatiotemporal Suicide Clusters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1