Food Insecurity, the Food Environment, and COVID-19 in Rural South Carolina.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Family & Community Health Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1097/FCH.0000000000000355
Samuel L K Baxter, Caitlin E Koob, Cassius M L Hossfeld, Sarah F Griffin, Catherine Mobley, Leslie H Hossfeld
{"title":"Food Insecurity, the Food Environment, and COVID-19 in Rural South Carolina.","authors":"Samuel L K Baxter,&nbsp;Caitlin E Koob,&nbsp;Cassius M L Hossfeld,&nbsp;Sarah F Griffin,&nbsp;Catherine Mobley,&nbsp;Leslie H Hossfeld","doi":"10.1097/FCH.0000000000000355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we explored the relationship between the food environment and food security among rural adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Researchers, with assistance from community partners, conducted a cross-sectional survey assessing the impact of COVID-19 on food access, food security, and physical activity in 9 rural South Carolina (SC) counties. This survey was administered to a purposive sample (N = 587) from August 2020 to March 2021. The dependent variable was a binary indicator of food insecurity (past 3 months), in accordance with the USDA Household Food Security Survey Module. Independent variables were sociodemographic characteristics, food environment factors (eg, shopping at grocery stores, partial markets, and farmers' markets), and shopping behaviors during the pandemic. Overall, 31% of respondents were food insecure. Food security status differed by income and household composition. Results indicate that the odds of food insecurity were higher for respondents who shopped frequently at partial markets (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-2.56) and shopped more for food before the pandemic than during the pandemic (AOR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.07-2.64). Findings underscore the importance of examining the relationship between the food environment and food insecurity during COVID-19 in rural settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47183,"journal":{"name":"Family & Community Health","volume":"46 2","pages":"128-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930688/pdf/fache-46-128.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family & Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we explored the relationship between the food environment and food security among rural adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Researchers, with assistance from community partners, conducted a cross-sectional survey assessing the impact of COVID-19 on food access, food security, and physical activity in 9 rural South Carolina (SC) counties. This survey was administered to a purposive sample (N = 587) from August 2020 to March 2021. The dependent variable was a binary indicator of food insecurity (past 3 months), in accordance with the USDA Household Food Security Survey Module. Independent variables were sociodemographic characteristics, food environment factors (eg, shopping at grocery stores, partial markets, and farmers' markets), and shopping behaviors during the pandemic. Overall, 31% of respondents were food insecure. Food security status differed by income and household composition. Results indicate that the odds of food insecurity were higher for respondents who shopped frequently at partial markets (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-2.56) and shopped more for food before the pandemic than during the pandemic (AOR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.07-2.64). Findings underscore the importance of examining the relationship between the food environment and food insecurity during COVID-19 in rural settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南卡罗来纳州农村地区的粮食不安全、粮食环境和COVID-19。
在这项研究中,我们探讨了2019冠状病毒病大流行期间农村成年人的粮食环境与粮食安全之间的关系。在社区合作伙伴的帮助下,研究人员进行了一项横断面调查,评估了COVID-19对南卡罗来纳州9个农村县的粮食获取、粮食安全和身体活动的影响。本调查于2020年8月至2021年3月对目的样本(N = 587)进行。根据美国农业部家庭粮食安全调查模块,因变量是粮食不安全(过去3个月)的二元指标。自变量为社会人口特征、食品环境因素(例如,在杂货店、部分市场和农贸市场购物)以及大流行期间的购物行为。总体而言,31%的答复者处于粮食不安全状态。粮食安全状况因收入和家庭构成而异。结果表明,经常在部分市场购物的受访者出现粮食不安全的几率更高(调整后的优势比[AOR] = 1.61, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.01-2.56),并且在大流行前购买食品的次数比大流行期间更多(AOR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.07-2.64)。调查结果强调了在2019冠状病毒病期间研究农村粮食环境与粮食不安全之间关系的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Family & Community Health is a practical quarterly which presents creative, multidisciplinary perspectives and approaches for effective public and community health programs. Each issue focuses on a single timely topic and addresses issues of concern to a wide variety of population groups with diverse ethnic backgrounds, including children and the elderly, men and women, and rural and urban communities.
期刊最新文献
"Pushed to Their Limits": Health Care Provider Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing a Mind-Body and Activity Program for Older Adults With Chronic Pain in a Community Clinic for the Underserved. Contraceptive Use and Its Associations With Social Determinants of Health Among Young Adults. "Breaking Bread" With Respondents: Strategies to Increase Response Rates and Create Long-Term Cooperation With Health Clinic Administrators. Nepali Translation, Validity and Reliability Study of the Cohen-Hoberman Inventory of Physical Symptoms for Utilization With Bhutanese Refugees. A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Factors Promoting Intergenerational Resilience in Adolescent Youth With Refugee Status.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1