Patterns of inflammatory immune responses in patients with septic shock receiving vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine: clustering analysis in Korea.

IF 1.7 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Acute and Critical Care Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.4266/acc.2023.00507
Seung-Hun You, Oh Joo Kweon, Sun-Young Jung, Moon Seong Baek, Won-Young Kim
{"title":"Patterns of inflammatory immune responses in patients with septic shock receiving vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine: clustering analysis in Korea.","authors":"Seung-Hun You,&nbsp;Oh Joo Kweon,&nbsp;Sun-Young Jung,&nbsp;Moon Seong Baek,&nbsp;Won-Young Kim","doi":"10.4266/acc.2023.00507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is characterized by heterogeneous immune responses that may evolve during the course of illness. This study identified inflammatory immune responses in septic patients receiving vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, post-hoc analysis of 95 patients with septic shock who received the vitamin C protocol. Blood samples were drawn on days 1-2, 3-4, and 6-8 after shock onset. Group-based multi-trajectory modeling was used to identify immune trajectory groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 78 years (interquartile range, 70-84 years), and 56% were male. Clustering analysis identified group 1 (n=41), which was characterized by lower interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and IL-10 levels, and these levels remained stationary or mildly increased until day 7. Conversely, group 2 (n=54) expressed initially higher IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-10 levels that decreased rapidly by day 4. There was a nonsignificant increase in lymphocyte count and a decrease in C-reactive protein level until day 7 in group 2. The intensive care unit mortality rate was significantly lower in group 2 (39.0% vs. 18.5%, P=0.03). Group 2 also had a significantly higher decrease in the mean (standard deviation) vasopressor dose (norepinephrine equivalent: -0.09±0.16 μg/kg/min vs. -0.23±0.31 μg/kg/min, P<0.001) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (0±5 vs. -4±3, P=0.002) between days 1 and 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There may be different subphenotypes in septic patients receiving the vitamin C protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":44118,"journal":{"name":"Acute and Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/20/acc-2023-00507.PMC10497889.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2023.00507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is characterized by heterogeneous immune responses that may evolve during the course of illness. This study identified inflammatory immune responses in septic patients receiving vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine.

Methods: This was a single-center, post-hoc analysis of 95 patients with septic shock who received the vitamin C protocol. Blood samples were drawn on days 1-2, 3-4, and 6-8 after shock onset. Group-based multi-trajectory modeling was used to identify immune trajectory groups.

Results: The median age was 78 years (interquartile range, 70-84 years), and 56% were male. Clustering analysis identified group 1 (n=41), which was characterized by lower interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and IL-10 levels, and these levels remained stationary or mildly increased until day 7. Conversely, group 2 (n=54) expressed initially higher IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-10 levels that decreased rapidly by day 4. There was a nonsignificant increase in lymphocyte count and a decrease in C-reactive protein level until day 7 in group 2. The intensive care unit mortality rate was significantly lower in group 2 (39.0% vs. 18.5%, P=0.03). Group 2 also had a significantly higher decrease in the mean (standard deviation) vasopressor dose (norepinephrine equivalent: -0.09±0.16 μg/kg/min vs. -0.23±0.31 μg/kg/min, P<0.001) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (0±5 vs. -4±3, P=0.002) between days 1 and 4.

Conclusions: There may be different subphenotypes in septic patients receiving the vitamin C protocol.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受维生素C、氢化可的松和硫胺素治疗的感染性休克患者的炎症免疫反应模式:韩国的聚类分析
背景:脓毒症的特点是在疾病过程中可能发生异质性免疫反应。本研究确定了接受维生素C、氢化可的松和硫胺素治疗的脓毒症患者的炎症免疫反应。方法:这是一项对95例接受维生素C治疗的感染性休克患者进行的单中心事后分析。分别于休克后1-2、3-4、6-8天采血。采用基于群体的多轨迹建模方法识别免疫轨迹组。结果:中位年龄为78岁(四分位数范围70-84岁),56%为男性。聚类分析确定了1组(n=41),其特征是白细胞介素(IL)-6、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α和IL-10水平较低,这些水平保持平稳或轻度升高,直到第7天。相反,组2 (n=54)最初表达较高的IL-6、TNF-α和IL-10水平,并在第4天迅速下降。第2组至第7天淋巴细胞计数无显著升高,c反应蛋白水平下降。2组重症监护病房死亡率明显低于对照组(39.0% vs. 18.5%, P=0.03)。2组抗利尿激素剂量(去甲肾上腺素等量:-0.09±0.16 μg/kg/min vs -0.23±0.31 μg/kg/min)的平均(标准差)降低也显著高于对照组。结论:接受维生素C治疗的脓毒症患者可能存在不同的亚表型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acute and Critical Care
Acute and Critical Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A clinical risk score for predicting acute kidney injury in sepsis patients receiving normal saline in Northern Thailand: a retrospective cohort study. A quasi-experimental study to assess the effect of Benson's relaxation on anxiety and depression among patients with heart failure in Jordan. A study to assess the psychosocial needs of patient family members in the intensive care unit in India. Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency: latest pathophysiology and management guidelines. Incidence of hypothermia in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy in Siriraj Hospital, Thailand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1