Day to Day and Environmental Risk Factors for Psychological Distress Among Healthcare Workers: A Mixed Methods Analysis.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-23 DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000002909
Kaitlyn Atkins, Erin E Cooney, Soim Park, Svea Closser, Pamela J Surkan, Hannah C Marker, Sarah Schneider-Firestone, Luther G Kalb, Johannes Thrul, Tener Goodwin Veenema
{"title":"Day to Day and Environmental Risk Factors for Psychological Distress Among Healthcare Workers: A Mixed Methods Analysis.","authors":"Kaitlyn Atkins, Erin E Cooney, Soim Park, Svea Closser, Pamela J Surkan, Hannah C Marker, Sarah Schneider-Firestone, Luther G Kalb, Johannes Thrul, Tener Goodwin Veenema","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000002909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite a growing literature on mental health among clinical staff during COVID-19, factors shaping distress for nonclinical staff are understudied and may be driven by inequalities at work. We aimed to discuss the role of workplace factors in shaping psychological distress for a diverse group of clinical, nonclinical, and other health and hospital workers (HHWs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This convergent parallel mixed-methods study with HHWs in a US hospital system included an online survey ( n = 1127) and interviews ( n = 73) collected from August 2020 to January 2021. We thematically analyzed interviews; findings informed log binomial regression estimating risk factors for severe psychological distress (Patient Health Questionnaire - 4 item version [PHQ-4] scores of 9 or greater).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitatively, day-to-day stressors fostered fear and anxiety, and concerns about work environments manifest as betrayal and frustration with leadership. Distress was associated with burnout, financial concerns, and feeling betrayed or unsupported by the institution and leadership. Staff in service versus clinical roles had higher risk for severe distress (adjusted prevalence ratio = 2.04, 95% confidence interval = 1.13-2.66); HHWs receiving workplace mental health support had lower risk (adjusted prevalence ratio = 0.52, 95% confidence interval = 0.29-0.92.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our mixed-methods study underscores how the pandemic brought inequalities to the surface to increase distress for vulnerable HHWs. Workplace mental health activities can support HHWs now and during future crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":16631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"65 9","pages":"e593-e603"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002909","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite a growing literature on mental health among clinical staff during COVID-19, factors shaping distress for nonclinical staff are understudied and may be driven by inequalities at work. We aimed to discuss the role of workplace factors in shaping psychological distress for a diverse group of clinical, nonclinical, and other health and hospital workers (HHWs).

Methods: This convergent parallel mixed-methods study with HHWs in a US hospital system included an online survey ( n = 1127) and interviews ( n = 73) collected from August 2020 to January 2021. We thematically analyzed interviews; findings informed log binomial regression estimating risk factors for severe psychological distress (Patient Health Questionnaire - 4 item version [PHQ-4] scores of 9 or greater).

Results: Qualitatively, day-to-day stressors fostered fear and anxiety, and concerns about work environments manifest as betrayal and frustration with leadership. Distress was associated with burnout, financial concerns, and feeling betrayed or unsupported by the institution and leadership. Staff in service versus clinical roles had higher risk for severe distress (adjusted prevalence ratio = 2.04, 95% confidence interval = 1.13-2.66); HHWs receiving workplace mental health support had lower risk (adjusted prevalence ratio = 0.52, 95% confidence interval = 0.29-0.92.

Conclusions: Our mixed-methods study underscores how the pandemic brought inequalities to the surface to increase distress for vulnerable HHWs. Workplace mental health activities can support HHWs now and during future crises.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医护人员心理压力的日常和环境风险因素:混合方法分析。
目的:尽管在 COVID-19 期间,有关临床工作人员心理健康的文献越来越多,但对影响非临床工作人员心理压力的因素研究不足,而且这些因素可能是由工作中的不平等造成的。我们旨在讨论工作场所因素在影响临床、非临床及其他卫生和医院工作人员(HHWs)心理压力方面的作用:这项针对美国一家医院系统的保健和医院工作者的趋同平行混合方法研究包括在线调查(n = 1127)和访谈(n = 73),收集时间为 2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 1 月。我们对访谈进行了专题分析;研究结果为估计严重心理困扰(患者健康问卷--4项版本[PHQ-4]得分达到或超过9分)风险因素的对数二项式回归提供了依据:从定性角度看,日常压力会引发恐惧和焦虑,对工作环境的担忧表现为对领导的背叛和挫败感。压力与职业倦怠、财务问题以及感觉被机构和领导背叛或得不到支持有关。服务与临床角色的工作人员面临严重困扰的风险较高(调整流行率=2.04,95%置信区间=1.13-2.66);接受工作场所心理健康支持的高级保健工作者面临的风险较低(调整流行率=0.52,95%置信区间=0.29-0.92):我们的混合方法研究强调了大流行病如何使不平等现象浮出水面,从而增加了弱势家庭主妇的痛苦。工作场所的心理健康活动可以在当前和未来的危机中为高危人群提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
402
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an indispensable guide to good health in the workplace for physicians, nurses, and researchers alike. In-depth, clinically oriented research articles and technical reports keep occupational and environmental medicine specialists up-to-date on new medical developments in the prevention, diagnosis, and rehabilitation of environmentally induced conditions and work-related injuries and illnesses.
期刊最新文献
Proposed Framework for Developing and Evaluating Total Worker Health® Education and Training Programs. Long-term impairment from irritant-induced occupational asthma. Unmet Mental Health Needs Among California Workers Since the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Multilevel Mindfulness: Which organizational factors stimulate mindfulness in the workplace? The Influence of Emergency Call Volume on Occupational Workload and Sleep Quality in Urban Firefighters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1