Comparison of Ussing Chamber and Caco-2 Model in Evaluation of Intestinal Absorption Mechanism of Compounds from Different BCS Classifications.

Dong Tian, Yingxin Yang, Huiying Zhang, Hongwen Du, Hongyu Zhou, Tao Wang
{"title":"Comparison of Ussing Chamber and Caco-2 Model in Evaluation of Intestinal Absorption Mechanism of Compounds from Different BCS Classifications.","authors":"Dong Tian, Yingxin Yang, Huiying Zhang, Hongwen Du, Hongyu Zhou, Tao Wang","doi":"10.2174/2949681016666230913105920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral bioavailability (F), which is evaluated by permeability and solubility, is one of the key parameters in drug discovery. Currently, Caco-2 and Ussing chamber are both used in the study of intestinal permeability of drugs at different stages of drug development. However, comparative research between the Ussing chamber and Caco-2 for predicting the intestinal availability data (<i>F<sub>a</sub>×F<sub>g</sub></i>) in humans has not been reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the present study, we evaluated the permeability of 22 drugs in rat intestines by Ussing chamber and compared them with the reported permeability data from Caco-2. In addition, the active transport of gabapentin was evaluated by Ussing Chamber.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intestine segments were selected by corresponding absorption site for Ussing chamber analysis. BCS Class I and II compounds were more absorbed in the duodenum and jejunum, and Class III and IV compounds were more absorbed in the ileum. P<sub>app</sub> values in the Caco-2 model were moderately correlated with human <i>F<sub>a</sub>×F<sub>g</sub></i> (<i>R<sup>2</sup></i>=0.722), and the P<sub>app</sub> of the rat in the Ussing chamber revealed a better correlation with human <i>F<sub>a</sub>×F<sub>g</sub></i> (<i>R<sup>2</sup></i>=0.952). In addition, we also used the Ussing chamber to identify the transporter of gabapentin, and the results showed that the active absorption of gabapentin was related to LAT1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ussing chamber combined with rat intestinal tissue would be a significant tool for predicting the intestinal absorption and metabolism of compounds with diverse physiochemical characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":72844,"journal":{"name":"Drug metabolism and bioanalysis letters","volume":" ","pages":"105-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug metabolism and bioanalysis letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2949681016666230913105920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral bioavailability (F), which is evaluated by permeability and solubility, is one of the key parameters in drug discovery. Currently, Caco-2 and Ussing chamber are both used in the study of intestinal permeability of drugs at different stages of drug development. However, comparative research between the Ussing chamber and Caco-2 for predicting the intestinal availability data (Fa×Fg) in humans has not been reported.

Methods: In the present study, we evaluated the permeability of 22 drugs in rat intestines by Ussing chamber and compared them with the reported permeability data from Caco-2. In addition, the active transport of gabapentin was evaluated by Ussing Chamber.

Results: Intestine segments were selected by corresponding absorption site for Ussing chamber analysis. BCS Class I and II compounds were more absorbed in the duodenum and jejunum, and Class III and IV compounds were more absorbed in the ileum. Papp values in the Caco-2 model were moderately correlated with human Fa×Fg (R2=0.722), and the Papp of the rat in the Ussing chamber revealed a better correlation with human Fa×Fg (R2=0.952). In addition, we also used the Ussing chamber to identify the transporter of gabapentin, and the results showed that the active absorption of gabapentin was related to LAT1.

Conclusion: Ussing chamber combined with rat intestinal tissue would be a significant tool for predicting the intestinal absorption and metabolism of compounds with diverse physiochemical characteristics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同BCS分类化合物肠道吸收机制评价的实验与Caco-2模型比较
背景:口服生物利用度(F)是药物开发的关键参数之一,它通过渗透性和溶解度来评价。目前在药物开发的不同阶段,Caco-2和Ussing chamber都被用于药物肠通透性的研究。然而,Ussing chamber和Caco-2在预测人类肠道可利用性数据(Fa×Fg)方面的比较研究尚未报道。方法:采用Ussing chamber法测定22种药物在大鼠肠内的通透性,并与Caco-2测定的通透性数据进行比较。采用Ussing Chamber法评价加巴喷丁的主动转运能力。结果:选取吸收部位对应的肠段,进行腔室分析。BCS I类和II类化合物在十二指肠和空肠吸收较多,III类和IV类化合物在回肠吸收较多。Caco-2模型的Papp值与人Fa×Fg有中等相关性(R2=0.722), Ussing室大鼠的Papp值与人Fa×Fg有较好的相关性(R2=0.952)。此外,我们还利用Ussing chamber对加巴喷丁的转运体进行了鉴定,结果表明,加巴喷丁的活性吸收与LAT1有关。结论:将实验室与大鼠肠道组织结合,是预测具有不同理化特性的化合物在肠道吸收代谢的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Precision Formulation of Ocular Films for Eye Infections Using Innovative Quality by Design Optimization. Quantification of Lobeglitazone Sulfate in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Form by a Validated UV Spectroscopy Method: A New Thiazolidinedione Anti-diabetic Drug Rapid, Simple and Low-Cost Analytical Method Development for Quantification of Eltrombopag Olamine in Tablet dosage by UV Spectroscopy Method Stability Indicating Method Development and Validation for the Estimation of Bempedoic Acid by RP-HPLC Stimulatory and Inhibitory Effect of Antipsychotic Agents Including Dopaminergic Neuro-depressants on Dopamine Formation from p-tyramine Mediated by Cytochrome P450 2D6.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1