Classification of dental implant systems using cloud-based deep learning algorithm: an experimental study.

IF 1.4 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Yeungnam medical science Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-26 DOI:10.12701/jyms.2023.00465
Hyun Jun Kong
{"title":"Classification of dental implant systems using cloud-based deep learning algorithm: an experimental study.","authors":"Hyun Jun Kong","doi":"10.12701/jyms.2023.00465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and clinical usability of implant system classification using automated machine learning on a Google Cloud platform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four dental implant systems were selected: Osstem TSIII, Osstem USII, Biomet 3i Os-seotite External, and Dentsply Sirona Xive. A total of 4,800 periapical radiographs (1,200 for each implant system) were collected and labeled based on electronic medical records. Regions of interest were manually cropped to 400×800 pixels, and all images were uploaded to Google Cloud storage. Approximately 80% of the images were used for training, 10% for validation, and 10% for testing. Google automated machine learning (AutoML) Vision automatically executed a neural architecture search technology to apply an appropriate algorithm to the uploaded data. A single-label image classification model was trained using AutoML. The performance of the mod-el was evaluated in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and F1 score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and F1 score of the AutoML Vision model were 0.981, 0.963, 0.961, 0.985, and 0.962, respectively. Osstem TSIII had an accuracy of 100%. Osstem USII and 3i Osseotite External were most often confused in the confusion matrix.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning-based AutoML on a cloud platform showed high accuracy in the classification of dental implant systems as a fine-tuned convolutional neural network. Higher-quality images from various implant systems will be required to improve the performance and clinical usability of the model.</p>","PeriodicalId":74020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Yeungnam medical science","volume":" ","pages":"S29-S36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10718610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Yeungnam medical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12701/jyms.2023.00465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and clinical usability of implant system classification using automated machine learning on a Google Cloud platform.

Methods: Four dental implant systems were selected: Osstem TSIII, Osstem USII, Biomet 3i Os-seotite External, and Dentsply Sirona Xive. A total of 4,800 periapical radiographs (1,200 for each implant system) were collected and labeled based on electronic medical records. Regions of interest were manually cropped to 400×800 pixels, and all images were uploaded to Google Cloud storage. Approximately 80% of the images were used for training, 10% for validation, and 10% for testing. Google automated machine learning (AutoML) Vision automatically executed a neural architecture search technology to apply an appropriate algorithm to the uploaded data. A single-label image classification model was trained using AutoML. The performance of the mod-el was evaluated in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and F1 score.

Results: The accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and F1 score of the AutoML Vision model were 0.981, 0.963, 0.961, 0.985, and 0.962, respectively. Osstem TSIII had an accuracy of 100%. Osstem USII and 3i Osseotite External were most often confused in the confusion matrix.

Conclusion: Deep learning-based AutoML on a cloud platform showed high accuracy in the classification of dental implant systems as a fine-tuned convolutional neural network. Higher-quality images from various implant systems will be required to improve the performance and clinical usability of the model.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于云的深度学习算法的牙种植体系统分类实验研究。
背景:本研究旨在评估在谷歌云平台上使用自动机器学习进行种植体系统分类的准确性和临床可用性。方法:选择4种种植体系统:Osstem TSIII、Osstem USII、Biomet 3i Os-seotite External和Dentsply Sirona Xive。收集了4800张根尖周x线片(每个种植体系统1200张),并根据电子病历进行标记。感兴趣的区域被手动裁剪为400×800像素,所有图像都被上传到谷歌云存储。大约80%的图像用于训练,10%用于验证,10%用于测试。谷歌自动机器学习(AutoML) Vision自动执行神经架构搜索技术,将适当的算法应用于上传的数据。使用AutoML训练单标签图像分类模型。模型的性能从准确性、精密度、召回率、特异性和F1评分方面进行评估。结果:AutoML Vision模型的准确率、精密度、召回率、特异性和F1评分分别为0.981、0.963、0.961、0.985和0.962。系统TSIII的准确度为100%。在混淆矩阵中,系统USII和3i骨梯外部最容易混淆。结论:基于云平台的深度学习AutoML作为一种微调卷积神经网络,在牙种植体系统分类中具有较高的准确率。将需要来自各种植入系统的高质量图像来提高模型的性能和临床可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute postoperative pain control in pediatric patients: a scoping review. What should researchers do in the era of artificial intelligence? Comparing emergency medical system governance in Japan and South Korea: lessons for high-income countries from a multisource comparative health systems analysis. Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing ileostomy closure: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Health system disruption and oncologic consequences: a natural experiment in South Korea's 2024 medical walkout-a retrospective observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1