Quantitative Evaluation of Single-Use Particle Filtering Half Masks for SARS-CoV-2 Protection.

Abstract

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic put the entire healthcare sector under severe strain due to shortages of personal protection equipment. A large number of new filtering mask models were introduced on the market, claiming effectiveness that had undergone little or no objective and reliable verifications. Methods and Materials: Filter materials were tested against sodium chloride particles according to the EN149 §7.9.2 standard for particle penetration. Particle counters were used to measure the particle penetration of the filtering mask models, resolved over sizes in the range of 27-1000 nm. Results: We report on the results for 86 different filtering mask models. The majority of the tested models showed <3% penetration, whereas almost one third (i.e., 27 of 86) of the models performed poorly. Discussion: Interestingly, the poorest performing masks showed a tendency to have worse filtering effectiveness for larger particles than for smaller sized particles, following the opposite tendency of the best filtering masks. Conclusion: Almost one third of the filtering mask models tested failed the specified pass criteria as specified in the temporary EU COVID-19 standard. This fact, and the high health risks of COVID-19, highlights the need for independent testing.