A new hematologic predictor of major adverse events after cardiac surgery: red cell distribution width to lymphocyte ratio.

Seda Kurtbeyoğlu, Aslı Demir, Eda Balcı, Hülya Yiğit Özay, Bilal Katipoğlu, Hayrettin Levent Mavioğlu
{"title":"A new hematologic predictor of major adverse events after cardiac surgery: red cell distribution width to lymphocyte ratio.","authors":"Seda Kurtbeyoğlu,&nbsp;Aslı Demir,&nbsp;Eda Balcı,&nbsp;Hülya Yiğit Özay,&nbsp;Bilal Katipoğlu,&nbsp;Hayrettin Levent Mavioğlu","doi":"10.17085/apm.22244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The perioperative risk factors that cause severe morbidity and prolongation of postoperative hospital stay after cardiac surgery should be determined. Various scores have been used to predict morbidity and mortality. Preoperative blood counts are considered potential biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress. Inflammatory and immune imbalances may have a significant impact on postoperative adverse events. The present study aimed to investigate the association and potential predictive properties of red cell distribution width/ lymphocyte ratio (RLR) for major adverse events in adult patients who underwent coronary surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After approval from the ethics committee, pre- and post-operative data of 700 patients were obtained from the electronic database of the hospital, intra- and post-operative anesthesia, and intensive care unit follow-up charts. We performed a stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis to investigate the association of RLR with major adverse events in adult patients who underwent coronary surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 700 patients, 47 (6.7%) had major adverse events after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.12; P < 0.001), mean platelet volume (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.07-2.06; P = 0.017), and RLR (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.43; P = 0.026) were significantly associated with major adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RLR indicates the balance between inflammatory and immune responses. Therefore, it can be used to predict adverse events following coronary surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7801,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"18 3","pages":"284-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/12/64/apm-22244.PMC10410548.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.22244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The perioperative risk factors that cause severe morbidity and prolongation of postoperative hospital stay after cardiac surgery should be determined. Various scores have been used to predict morbidity and mortality. Preoperative blood counts are considered potential biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress. Inflammatory and immune imbalances may have a significant impact on postoperative adverse events. The present study aimed to investigate the association and potential predictive properties of red cell distribution width/ lymphocyte ratio (RLR) for major adverse events in adult patients who underwent coronary surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Methods: After approval from the ethics committee, pre- and post-operative data of 700 patients were obtained from the electronic database of the hospital, intra- and post-operative anesthesia, and intensive care unit follow-up charts. We performed a stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis to investigate the association of RLR with major adverse events in adult patients who underwent coronary surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Results: Among 700 patients, 47 (6.7%) had major adverse events after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.12; P < 0.001), mean platelet volume (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.07-2.06; P = 0.017), and RLR (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.43; P = 0.026) were significantly associated with major adverse events.

Conclusions: RLR indicates the balance between inflammatory and immune responses. Therefore, it can be used to predict adverse events following coronary surgery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏手术后主要不良事件的一个新的血液学预测指标:红细胞分布宽度与淋巴细胞比值。
背景:应确定导致心脏手术后严重并发症和延长术后住院时间的围手术期危险因素。各种评分被用来预测发病率和死亡率。术前血细胞计数被认为是炎症和氧化应激的潜在生物标志物。炎症和免疫失衡可能对术后不良事件有重要影响。本研究旨在探讨成人冠状动脉手术合并体外循环患者红细胞分布宽度/淋巴细胞比值(RLR)与主要不良事件的关系及其潜在的预测特性。方法:经伦理委员会批准,从医院电子数据库、术中、术后麻醉、重症监护病房随访图中获取700例患者的术前、术后资料。我们进行了逐步多元logistic回归分析,以调查接受冠状动脉手术合并体外循环的成年患者RLR与主要不良事件的关系。结果:700例患者中有47例(6.7%)发生术后重大不良事件。多因素logistic回归分析显示,年龄(优势比[OR], 1.08;95%置信区间[CI], 1.03-1.12;P < 0.001),平均血小板体积(OR, 1.49;95% ci, 1.07-2.06;P = 0.017), RLR (OR, 1.21;95% ci, 1.02-1.43;P = 0.026)与主要不良事件显著相关。结论:RLR提示炎症反应和免疫反应之间的平衡。因此,它可以用来预测冠状动脉手术后的不良事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anesthetic neurotoxicity in the developing brain: an update on theinsights and implications for fetal surgery Extubation and removal of supraglottic airway devices in pediatric anesthesia Relationship between intraoperative requirement for anesthetics and postoperative analgesic consumption in laparoscopic colectomy: a randomized controlled double-blinded study Opioid-free anesthesia using a combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial How does circadian rhythm affect postoperative pain after pediatric acute appendicitis surgery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1