Short and long-term effectiveness of external shock wave therapy for chronic pelvic pain syndrome in men.

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Arab Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/2090598X.2023.2207415
Kareim Khalafalla, Ahmed Albakr, Walid El Ansari, Ahmad Majzoub, Haitham Elbardisi, Khalid AlRumaihi, Mohamed Arafa
{"title":"Short and long-term effectiveness of external shock wave therapy for chronic pelvic pain syndrome in men.","authors":"Kareim Khalafalla,&nbsp;Ahmed Albakr,&nbsp;Walid El Ansari,&nbsp;Ahmad Majzoub,&nbsp;Haitham Elbardisi,&nbsp;Khalid AlRumaihi,&nbsp;Mohamed Arafa","doi":"10.1080/2090598X.2023.2207415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is a frequent urological diagnosis that affects men's quality of life. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is a recent treatment option for patients with CPPS. We evaluated ESWT's short and long - term efficacy in managing CPPS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective self-controlled study included 75 patients diagnosed with CPPS at our tertiary pelvic pain clinic between January 2017-June 2019. Patients were referred for ESWT and received four sessions one week apart. The National Institute for Health - Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH - CPSI) questionnaire was used to assess patients' symptom severity before starting therapy and at 0, 12 and 26 weeks after completing ESWT. Demographics, clinical data and complications were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients' mean age was 37.9 ± 8.6 years, and mean duration of symptoms was 5 ± 4.5 years. Compared to pre-treatment scores, all patients exhibited improvements across all NIH - CPSI domains directly after completing ESWT (week 0 post-treatment), with a mean difference improvement of 9.26 ± 5.7, 5.2 ± 3.4, 1.19 ± 2.18 and 2.88 ± 2.46 points in the total, pain, urinary symptoms, and quality-of-life scores respectively. At 12 weeks after completing ESWT, 80.9% of patients reported improvements, with mean difference improvement of 8.07 ± 7.56, 4.55 ± 4.6, 0.76 ± 2.48, 2.85 ± 2.78 in the total, pain, urinary symptoms, and quality-of-life scores respectively. Again, none of the patients developed any treatment-related complications. At 26 weeks after completing ESWT, 82.4% of patients reported improvements, with mean difference improvement of 8.29 ± 7.7%, 4.92 ± 4.69, 0.75 ± 2.96, 2.5 ± 3.0 in total, pain, urinary symptoms, and quality-of-life scores respectively. None of the patients developed treatment-related complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ESWT is a safe and effective treatment modality for patients with CPPS, with short-term improvement in total, pain, urinary symptom, and quality-of-life scores; and long-term improvement in total, pain, and quality-of-life scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":8113,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Urology","volume":"21 3","pages":"162-169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10373607/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2023.2207415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is a frequent urological diagnosis that affects men's quality of life. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is a recent treatment option for patients with CPPS. We evaluated ESWT's short and long - term efficacy in managing CPPS.

Methods: This prospective self-controlled study included 75 patients diagnosed with CPPS at our tertiary pelvic pain clinic between January 2017-June 2019. Patients were referred for ESWT and received four sessions one week apart. The National Institute for Health - Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH - CPSI) questionnaire was used to assess patients' symptom severity before starting therapy and at 0, 12 and 26 weeks after completing ESWT. Demographics, clinical data and complications were also recorded.

Results: Patients' mean age was 37.9 ± 8.6 years, and mean duration of symptoms was 5 ± 4.5 years. Compared to pre-treatment scores, all patients exhibited improvements across all NIH - CPSI domains directly after completing ESWT (week 0 post-treatment), with a mean difference improvement of 9.26 ± 5.7, 5.2 ± 3.4, 1.19 ± 2.18 and 2.88 ± 2.46 points in the total, pain, urinary symptoms, and quality-of-life scores respectively. At 12 weeks after completing ESWT, 80.9% of patients reported improvements, with mean difference improvement of 8.07 ± 7.56, 4.55 ± 4.6, 0.76 ± 2.48, 2.85 ± 2.78 in the total, pain, urinary symptoms, and quality-of-life scores respectively. Again, none of the patients developed any treatment-related complications. At 26 weeks after completing ESWT, 82.4% of patients reported improvements, with mean difference improvement of 8.29 ± 7.7%, 4.92 ± 4.69, 0.75 ± 2.96, 2.5 ± 3.0 in total, pain, urinary symptoms, and quality-of-life scores respectively. None of the patients developed treatment-related complications.

Conclusions: ESWT is a safe and effective treatment modality for patients with CPPS, with short-term improvement in total, pain, urinary symptom, and quality-of-life scores; and long-term improvement in total, pain, and quality-of-life scores.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外冲击波治疗男性慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的短期和长期疗效观察。
慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CPPS)是一种常见的泌尿科诊断,影响男性的生活质量。体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)是最近对CPPS患者的治疗选择。我们评估了ESWT治疗CPPS的短期和长期疗效。方法:这项前瞻性自我对照研究纳入了2017年1月至2019年6月在我们的三级盆腔疼痛诊所诊断为CPPS的75例患者。患者接受ESWT治疗,每隔一周接受四次治疗。使用美国国立卫生研究院-慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH - CPSI)问卷评估患者在开始治疗前和完成ESWT后0、12和26周的症状严重程度。同时记录人口统计学、临床资料和并发症。结果:患者平均年龄37.9±8.6岁,平均症状持续时间5±4.5年。与治疗前评分相比,所有患者在完成ESWT后(治疗后第0周)均表现出所有NIH - CPSI域的改善,总分、疼痛、泌尿系统症状和生活质量评分的平均差异分别为9.26±5.7分、5.2±3.4分、1.19±2.18分和2.88±2.46分。在完成ESWT后12周,80.9%的患者报告改善,总评分、疼痛评分、泌尿系统症状评分和生活质量评分的平均差异改善分别为8.07±7.56、4.55±4.6、0.76±2.48、2.85±2.78。同样,没有患者出现任何与治疗相关的并发症。在完成ESWT后26周,82.4%的患者报告改善,总、疼痛、泌尿系统症状和生活质量评分的平均差异改善分别为8.29±7.7%、4.92±4.69、0.75±2.96、2.5±3.0。所有患者均未出现治疗相关并发症。结论:ESWT对CPPS患者是一种安全有效的治疗方式,在总、疼痛、泌尿系统症状和生活质量评分方面有短期改善;以及总体、疼痛和生活质量评分的长期改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arab Journal of Urology
Arab Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Arab Journal of Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that strives to provide a high standard of research and clinical material to the widest possible urological community worldwide. The journal encompasses all aspects of urology including: urological oncology, urological reconstructive surgery, urodynamics, female urology, pediatric urology, endourology, transplantation, erectile dysfunction, and urinary infections and inflammations. The journal provides reviews, original articles, editorials, surgical techniques, cases reports and correspondence. Urologists, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and scientists are invited to submit their contributions to make the Arab Journal of Urology a viable international forum for the practical, timely and state-of-the-art clinical urology and basic urological research.
期刊最新文献
Comparative study of two techniques of laparoscopic burch colposuspension using sutures versus mesh in women with genuine stress urinary incontinence. Assessment of stone ablation rate using the Moses technology modes with different energy and pulse settings: An experimental study Mini-PCNL – a boon for CKD patients with nephrolithiasis Sixth edition of the World Health Organization laboratory manual of semen analysis: Updates and essential take away for busy clinicians Varicocele and male infertility conundrum: Making sense of a never-ending story for the busy clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1