Viloxazine for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

IF 2.6 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Central Nervous System Disease Pub Date : 2022-05-20 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11795735221092522
Alok Singh, Mahesh Kumar Balasundaram, Abhishek Singh
{"title":"Viloxazine for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Alok Singh, Mahesh Kumar Balasundaram, Abhishek Singh","doi":"10.1177/11795735221092522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) approved viloxazine extended-release (ER) to manage attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in pediatric patients of 6-17 years of age.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform a meta-analysis to determine the safety and efficacy of viloxazine ER in the management of ADHD.</p><p><strong>Data source and methods: </strong>A literature search was performed through the databases Cochrane Library, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov, for a period from inception to August 2021, with the keywords: viloxazine, SPN-812, ADHD, and randomized clinical trials. The randomized controlled trials published in English language that analyzed the efficacy and safety were included. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed by RoB tool. The outcomes included in this study were the proportion of patients with a 50% reduction in ADHD-Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5 responders) and improvement in CGI-I scale and the proportion of patients with at least one adverse event, the incidence of somnolence and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis includes 1605 patients from five randomized clinical trials; all of the trials were at low risk of bias. Viloxazine group had more ADHD-RS-5 responders as compared to placebo; RR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.36-1.93; <i>P</i> = <.00001. Significantly higher number of patients showed improved CGI-I score; RR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.32-1.78; <i>P</i> = <.00001. A higher proportion of patients was observed with at least one adverse event (RR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.24-1.85; <i>P</i> = <.0001), and somnolence (RR = 3.93; 95% CI = 2.11-7.31; <i>P</i> = <.0001) in viloxazine group. The incidence of SAEs was more in viloxazine group (RR = 2.98; 95% CI = .67-13.3; <i>P</i> = .15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Viloxazine was found to be significantly superior to placebo in both efficacy outcomes. Adverse events and somnolence were significantly more than the placebo. The incidence was SAEs was more in the viloxazine group but was not statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":15218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","volume":"14 ","pages":"11795735221092522"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/ee/10.1177_11795735221092522.PMC9125110.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795735221092522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recently, the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) approved viloxazine extended-release (ER) to manage attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in pediatric patients of 6-17 years of age.

Objective: To perform a meta-analysis to determine the safety and efficacy of viloxazine ER in the management of ADHD.

Data source and methods: A literature search was performed through the databases Cochrane Library, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov, for a period from inception to August 2021, with the keywords: viloxazine, SPN-812, ADHD, and randomized clinical trials. The randomized controlled trials published in English language that analyzed the efficacy and safety were included. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed by RoB tool. The outcomes included in this study were the proportion of patients with a 50% reduction in ADHD-Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5 responders) and improvement in CGI-I scale and the proportion of patients with at least one adverse event, the incidence of somnolence and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).

Results: This meta-analysis includes 1605 patients from five randomized clinical trials; all of the trials were at low risk of bias. Viloxazine group had more ADHD-RS-5 responders as compared to placebo; RR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.36-1.93; P = <.00001. Significantly higher number of patients showed improved CGI-I score; RR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.32-1.78; P = <.00001. A higher proportion of patients was observed with at least one adverse event (RR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.24-1.85; P = <.0001), and somnolence (RR = 3.93; 95% CI = 2.11-7.31; P = <.0001) in viloxazine group. The incidence of SAEs was more in viloxazine group (RR = 2.98; 95% CI = .67-13.3; P = .15).

Conclusions: Viloxazine was found to be significantly superior to placebo in both efficacy outcomes. Adverse events and somnolence were significantly more than the placebo. The incidence was SAEs was more in the viloxazine group but was not statistically significant.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍的维洛沙嗪:随机临床试验的系统回顾和元分析》。
背景:最近,美国食品和药物管理局(USFDA)批准了维洛氮平缓释片(ER),用于治疗6-17岁儿童患者的注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD):进行一项荟萃分析,以确定维洛沙嗪缓释片治疗多动症的安全性和有效性:在Cochrane Library、PubMed和clinicaltrials.gov等数据库中进行文献检索,检索期从开始到2021年8月,关键词为:viloxazine、SPN-812、ADHD和随机临床试验。纳入的随机对照试验均以英文发表,对疗效和安全性进行了分析。采用RoB工具评估偏倚风险(RoB)。研究结果包括ADHD-Rating Scale-5(ADHD-RS-5应答者)降低50%和CGI-I量表改善的患者比例,以及出现至少一种不良事件、嗜睡和严重不良事件(SAEs)的患者比例:这项荟萃分析包括来自五项随机临床试验的1605名患者;所有试验的偏倚风险都很低。与安慰剂相比,维洛沙嗪组有更多的ADHD-RS-5应答者;RR = 1.62;95% CI = 1.36-1.93;P = P = P = P = .15):结论:在两种疗效结果中,维洛氮平都明显优于安慰剂。不良反应和嗜睡明显多于安慰剂。维罗沙嗪组的 SAE 发生率更高,但无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Enriched environment may improve secondary brain injury after traumatic brain injury by regulating the TLR2/NF-κB signaling pathway. Letter re: Aseptic pleocytosis can only be classified as a phenotypic manifestation of MNGIE after exclusion of all differential causes. Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis with an adjusted subgroup analysis. Hemorrhagic stroke in children. Measurement of cerebral venous oxygenation with quantitative susceptibility mapping after subarachnoid hemorrhage: A pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1