Measurement of the cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG utilising a computerised algorithm: A retrospective observational study.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS JRSM Cardiovascular Disease Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20480040221096209
S C Chivers, T Vasavan, M Nandi, B R Hayes-Gill, I A Jayawardane, J M Simpson, C Williamson, W P Fifer, M Lucchini
{"title":"Measurement of the cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG utilising a computerised algorithm: A retrospective observational study.","authors":"S C Chivers,&nbsp;T Vasavan,&nbsp;M Nandi,&nbsp;B R Hayes-Gill,&nbsp;I A Jayawardane,&nbsp;J M Simpson,&nbsp;C Williamson,&nbsp;W P Fifer,&nbsp;M Lucchini","doi":"10.1177/20480040221096209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Establish whether the reliable measurement of cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG can be automated and to address whether this approach could be used to investigate large datasets.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Teaching hospitals in London UK, Nottingham UK and New York USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Singleton pregnancies with no known fetal abnormality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Archived fetal ECG's performed using the MonicaAN24 monitor. A single ECG (PQRST) complex was generated from 5000 signal-averaged beats and electrical cardiac time intervals measured in an automated way and manually.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Validation of a newly developed algorithm to measure the cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>188/236 (79.7%) subjects with fECGs of suitable signal:noise ratio were included for analysis comparing manual with automated measurement. PR interval was measured in 173/188 (92%), QRS complex in 170/188 (90%) and QT interval in 123/188 (65.4%). PR interval was 107.6 (12.07) ms [mean(SD)] manual vs 109.11 (14.7) ms algorithm. QRS duration was 54.72(6.35) ms manual vs 58.34(5.73) ms algorithm. QT-interval was 268.93 (21.59) ms manual vs 261.63 (36.16) ms algorithm. QTc was 407.5(32.71) ms manual vs 396.4 (54.78) ms algorithm. The QRS-duration increased with gestational age in both manual and algorithm measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Accurate measurement of fetal ECG cardiac time intervals can be automated with potential application to interpretation of larger datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":30457,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20480040221096209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/51/3e/10.1177_20480040221096209.PMC9102181.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040221096209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Establish whether the reliable measurement of cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG can be automated and to address whether this approach could be used to investigate large datasets.

Design: Retrospective observational study.

Setting: Teaching hospitals in London UK, Nottingham UK and New York USA.

Participants: Singleton pregnancies with no known fetal abnormality.

Methods: Archived fetal ECG's performed using the MonicaAN24 monitor. A single ECG (PQRST) complex was generated from 5000 signal-averaged beats and electrical cardiac time intervals measured in an automated way and manually.

Main outcome measure: Validation of a newly developed algorithm to measure the cardiac time intervals of the fetal ECG.

Results: 188/236 (79.7%) subjects with fECGs of suitable signal:noise ratio were included for analysis comparing manual with automated measurement. PR interval was measured in 173/188 (92%), QRS complex in 170/188 (90%) and QT interval in 123/188 (65.4%). PR interval was 107.6 (12.07) ms [mean(SD)] manual vs 109.11 (14.7) ms algorithm. QRS duration was 54.72(6.35) ms manual vs 58.34(5.73) ms algorithm. QT-interval was 268.93 (21.59) ms manual vs 261.63 (36.16) ms algorithm. QTc was 407.5(32.71) ms manual vs 396.4 (54.78) ms algorithm. The QRS-duration increased with gestational age in both manual and algorithm measurements.

Conclusion: Accurate measurement of fetal ECG cardiac time intervals can be automated with potential application to interpretation of larger datasets.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用计算机化算法测量胎儿心电图的心脏时间间隔:一项回顾性观察研究。
目的:确定胎儿心电图心脏时间间隔的可靠测量是否可以自动化,并探讨该方法是否可用于调查大型数据集。设计:回顾性观察性研究。地点:英国伦敦、英国诺丁汉和美国纽约的教学医院。参与者:没有已知胎儿异常的单胎妊娠。方法:采用MonicaAN24监护仪记录胎儿心电图。单心电图(PQRST)复合体由5000次信号平均心跳和以自动和手动方式测量的心电时间间隔生成。主要结果测量:验证了一种新开发的算法来测量胎儿心电图的心脏时间间隔。结果:有188/236例(79.7%)受试者的脑电图信噪比符合要求,进行人工测量与自动测量的对比分析。PR间期173/188 (92%),QRS复合体170/188 (90%),QT间期123/188(65.4%)。PR间隔为107.6 (12.07)ms [mean(SD)]手动vs 109.11 (14.7) ms算法。QRS持续时间为54.72(6.35)ms手动vs 58.34(5.73) ms算法。QT-interval为268.93 (21.59)ms手动vs 261.63 (36.16) ms算法。QTc为407.5(32.71)ms手动vs 396.4 (54.78) ms算法。人工和算法测量的qrs持续时间随胎龄增加。结论:胎儿心电图心脏时间间隔的精确测量可以自动化,并有可能应用于解释更大的数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
6.20%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biplane 3D overlay guidance for congenital heart disease to assist cardiac catheterization interventions-A pilot study. Impact of the completeness of revascularization and high bleeding risk status in acute coronary syndrome patients with multi-vessel disease: A retrospective analysis. Metabolic syndrome and its associated factors among adults with cardiac diseases: A cross-sectional comparative group study. Causal roles of immune cells in cardiovascular diseases: A Mendelian randomization (MR) study. Associations of variability in body mass index with cardiovascular outcomes in the general population: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1