Design for all A.U.D.I.T. (Assessment Universal Design & Inclusion Tool). A tool to evaluate physical, sensory-cognitive and social quality in healthcare facilities.
{"title":"Design for all A.U.D.I.T. (Assessment Universal Design & Inclusion Tool). A tool to evaluate physical, sensory-cognitive and social quality in healthcare facilities.","authors":"Erica Isa Mosca, Stefano Capolongo","doi":"10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Universal Design (UD) is the design of environments equally accessible and usable to the wider range of people regardless their abilities or disabilities. Various studies highlight the lack of evaluation tools to support decision makers to enhance inclusive environments, especially complex constructions with various users as healthcare facilities. The research proposes a tool to evaluate the quality of building according to UD through a new set of objective indicators with a performance-based approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>the tool has been developed through three main phases: 1. Analysis of the state of the art through a systematic literature review and workshops with stakeholders and experts; 2. Elaboration of the evaluation framework following the Multicriteria analysis methodology; 3. Application, to test and validate the tool in hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the tool, named Design for All A.U.D.I.T., evaluates the level of UD analyzing Physical, Sensory-cognitive, and Social quality through a set of criteria specified by indicators and measurable requirements. The tool assesses the different healthcare environments through criteria and indicators to verify the level of appropriateness in terms of UD. The tool provides report with quantitative, qualitative and graphical information in plan of the facility status and design strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study proposes an innovative evaluation system to determine the inclusion of hospitals, both for projects and for existing buildings. The flexible structure allows the tool to beapplied in different building typologies, currently adopted to identify hospital's weaknesses and setting priorities of intervention on inclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":35682,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense","volume":"94 S3","pages":"e2023124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background and aim: Universal Design (UD) is the design of environments equally accessible and usable to the wider range of people regardless their abilities or disabilities. Various studies highlight the lack of evaluation tools to support decision makers to enhance inclusive environments, especially complex constructions with various users as healthcare facilities. The research proposes a tool to evaluate the quality of building according to UD through a new set of objective indicators with a performance-based approach.
Methods: the tool has been developed through three main phases: 1. Analysis of the state of the art through a systematic literature review and workshops with stakeholders and experts; 2. Elaboration of the evaluation framework following the Multicriteria analysis methodology; 3. Application, to test and validate the tool in hospitals.
Results: the tool, named Design for All A.U.D.I.T., evaluates the level of UD analyzing Physical, Sensory-cognitive, and Social quality through a set of criteria specified by indicators and measurable requirements. The tool assesses the different healthcare environments through criteria and indicators to verify the level of appropriateness in terms of UD. The tool provides report with quantitative, qualitative and graphical information in plan of the facility status and design strategies.
Conclusions: The study proposes an innovative evaluation system to determine the inclusion of hospitals, both for projects and for existing buildings. The flexible structure allows the tool to beapplied in different building typologies, currently adopted to identify hospital's weaknesses and setting priorities of intervention on inclusion.
背景和目标:通用设计(UD)是指为更广泛的人设计同样方便和可用的环境,无论他们的能力或残疾如何。各种研究强调,缺乏评估工具来支持决策者改善包容性环境,尤其是将各种用户作为医疗设施的复杂建筑。该研究提出了一种工具,通过一套新的目标指标和基于绩效的方法,根据UD评估建筑质量。方法:该工具的开发经历了三个主要阶段:1。通过系统的文献综述和与利益相关者和专家的研讨会分析最新技术;2.按照多准则分析方法拟订评价框架;3.应用,在医院中测试和验证该工具。结果:该工具名为Design for All A.U.D.I.T.,通过指标和可衡量的要求指定的一组标准来评估UD分析身体、感官认知和社会质量的水平。该工具通过标准和指标评估不同的医疗保健环境,以验证UD的适当性水平。该工具在设施状态计划和设计策略中为报告提供定量、定性和图形信息。结论:该研究提出了一个创新的评估系统,以确定项目和现有建筑是否包括医院。灵活的结构使该工具能够应用于不同的建筑类型,目前用于识别医院的弱点并设定包容性干预的优先事项。
期刊介绍:
Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis is the official Journal of the Society of Medicine and Natural Sciences of Parma, and it is one of the few Italian Journals to be included in many excellent scientific data banks (i.e. MEDLINE). Acta Bio Medica was founded in 1887 and its founders and collaborators, Clinicians and Surgeons, entered history. Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis publishes Original Articles, Commentaries, Review Articles, Case Reports of experimental and general Medicine. A section is devoted to a Continuous Medical Education programme in order to help primary care Physicians to improve the quality of care.