An Evidenced-Based Review of Emergency Target Blood Pressure Management for Acute Aortic Dissection.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine International Pub Date : 2023-07-20 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/8392732
Hankui Hu, Zhoupeng Wu
{"title":"An Evidenced-Based Review of Emergency Target Blood Pressure Management for Acute Aortic Dissection.","authors":"Hankui Hu,&nbsp;Zhoupeng Wu","doi":"10.1155/2023/8392732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarize the best evidence of emergency target blood pressure management for acute aortic dissection and provide guidance for evidence-based practice of emergency target blood pressure management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>According to the \"6S\" evidence pyramid model, the evidence of emergency target blood pressure management of acute aortic dissection in various foreign databases and websites of professional associations from January 1, 2010, to August 1, 2022, was retrieved, including clinical decision-making, guidelines, expert consensus, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series. Two researchers used the corresponding document quality evaluation tools to evaluate the documents and extracted and summarized the evidence of documents above grade B.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 articles were included, including 6 clinical decision-making articles, 5 guidelines, 2 expert consensus articles, 1 systematic review article, 1 randomized controlled trial article, 1 cohort study article, and 1 case series article, forming 36 best evidences, including 9 topics, which are target value setting, management strategy, disease observation, medical history collection, monitoring methods, vasoactive drugs, nonvasoactive drugs, related examinations, and patient education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The best evidence summarized provides a reference for doctors and nurses in the emergency department to manage the emergency target blood pressure of patients with acute aortic dissection. It is recommended that doctors and nurses in the emergency department follow the best evidence summarized to develop individualized target blood pressure management plan for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11528,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine International","volume":"2023 ","pages":"8392732"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10374381/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8392732","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To summarize the best evidence of emergency target blood pressure management for acute aortic dissection and provide guidance for evidence-based practice of emergency target blood pressure management.

Methods: According to the "6S" evidence pyramid model, the evidence of emergency target blood pressure management of acute aortic dissection in various foreign databases and websites of professional associations from January 1, 2010, to August 1, 2022, was retrieved, including clinical decision-making, guidelines, expert consensus, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series. Two researchers used the corresponding document quality evaluation tools to evaluate the documents and extracted and summarized the evidence of documents above grade B.

Results: A total of 17 articles were included, including 6 clinical decision-making articles, 5 guidelines, 2 expert consensus articles, 1 systematic review article, 1 randomized controlled trial article, 1 cohort study article, and 1 case series article, forming 36 best evidences, including 9 topics, which are target value setting, management strategy, disease observation, medical history collection, monitoring methods, vasoactive drugs, nonvasoactive drugs, related examinations, and patient education.

Conclusion: The best evidence summarized provides a reference for doctors and nurses in the emergency department to manage the emergency target blood pressure of patients with acute aortic dissection. It is recommended that doctors and nurses in the emergency department follow the best evidence summarized to develop individualized target blood pressure management plan for patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性主动脉夹层急诊目标血压管理的循证回顾
目的:总结急性主动脉夹层急诊目标血压管理的最佳证据,为急诊目标血压的循证实践提供指导。方法:根据“6S”证据金字塔模型,检索2010年1月1日至2022年8月1日期间国外各数据库和专业协会网站上急性主动脉夹层急诊目标血压管理的证据,包括临床决策、指南、专家共识、系统综述、随机对照试验、队列研究,和案例系列。两名研究人员使用相应的文献质量评估工具对文献进行了评估,并提取和总结了B级以上文献的证据。结果:共收录17篇文章,其中临床决策文章6篇,指南5篇,专家共识文章2篇,系统综述文章1篇,随机对照试验文章1篇、队列研究文章1篇,1篇病例系列文章,形成36个最佳证据,包括9个主题,分别是目标值设定、管理策略、疾病观察、病史收集、监测方法、血管活性药物、非血管活性药物、相关检查和患者教育。结论:总结的最佳证据可为急诊科医生和护士管理急性主动脉夹层患者的急诊目标血压提供参考。建议急诊科的医生和护士遵循总结的最佳证据,为患者制定个性化的目标血压管理计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine International
Emergency Medicine International EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for doctors, nurses, paramedics and ambulance staff. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to prehospital care, disaster preparedness and response, acute medical and paediatric emergencies, critical care, sports medicine, wound care, and toxicology.
期刊最新文献
Risk Factors of In-Hospital Venous Thromboembolism and Prognosis After Emergent Ventral Hernia Repair. Risk Factors for Refractory Anaphylaxis in the Emergency Department. Assessment of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Knowledge Among Physicians in the Pediatrics Department of an Urban Tertiary Referral Hospital in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. YouTube as a Source of Information in Trauma Management for ATLS (10th Edition) Guidelines: Evaluation of Trauma Management Videos on YouTube. Comparison Between the Advanced Cardiac Life Support and Adult Advanced Life Support Protocols: A Simulation-Based Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1