Strategies for the management and prevention of withdrawal syndrome in critically ill pediatric patients: a systematic review.

Q2 Medicine Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-03 DOI:10.5935/0103-507X.20220145-pt
Kassiely Klein, Jéssica Silveira Pereira, Kátia Adriana Lins Jaines Curtinaz, Leonardo Bigolin Jantsch, Neila Santini de Souza, Paulo Roberto Antonaccio Carvalho
{"title":"Strategies for the management and prevention of withdrawal syndrome in critically ill pediatric patients: a systematic review.","authors":"Kassiely Klein, Jéssica Silveira Pereira, Kátia Adriana Lins Jaines Curtinaz, Leonardo Bigolin Jantsch, Neila Santini de Souza, Paulo Roberto Antonaccio Carvalho","doi":"10.5935/0103-507X.20220145-pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To verify strategies for the prevention and treatment of abstinence syndrome in a pediatric intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a systematic review in the PubMed database®, Lilacs, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, Cinahl, Cochrane Database Systematic Review and CENTRAL. A three-step search strategy was used for this review, and the protocol was approved in PROSPERO (CRD42021274670).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve articles were included in the analysis. There was great heterogeneity among the studies included, especially regarding the therapeutic regimens used for sedation and analgesia. Midazolam doses ranged from 0.05mg/kg/hour to 0.3mg/kg/hour. Morphine also varied considerably, from 10mcg/kg/hour to 30mcg/kg/hour, between studies. Among the 12 selected studies, the most commonly used scale for the identification of withdrawal symptoms was the Sophia Observational Withdrawal Symptoms Scale. In three studies, there was a statistically significant difference in the prevention and management of the withdrawal syndrome due to the implementation of different protocols (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was great variation in the sedoanalgesia regimen used by the studies and the method of weaning and evaluation of withdrawal syndrome. More studies are needed to provide more robust evidence about the most appropriate treatment for the prevention and reduction of withdrawal signs and symptoms in critically ill children.</p><p><strong>Prospero register: </strong>CRD 42021274670.</p>","PeriodicalId":53519,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva","volume":"34 4","pages":"507-518"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20220145-pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To verify strategies for the prevention and treatment of abstinence syndrome in a pediatric intensive care unit.

Methods: This is a systematic review in the PubMed database®, Lilacs, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, Cinahl, Cochrane Database Systematic Review and CENTRAL. A three-step search strategy was used for this review, and the protocol was approved in PROSPERO (CRD42021274670).

Results: Twelve articles were included in the analysis. There was great heterogeneity among the studies included, especially regarding the therapeutic regimens used for sedation and analgesia. Midazolam doses ranged from 0.05mg/kg/hour to 0.3mg/kg/hour. Morphine also varied considerably, from 10mcg/kg/hour to 30mcg/kg/hour, between studies. Among the 12 selected studies, the most commonly used scale for the identification of withdrawal symptoms was the Sophia Observational Withdrawal Symptoms Scale. In three studies, there was a statistically significant difference in the prevention and management of the withdrawal syndrome due to the implementation of different protocols (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001).

Conclusion: There was great variation in the sedoanalgesia regimen used by the studies and the method of weaning and evaluation of withdrawal syndrome. More studies are needed to provide more robust evidence about the most appropriate treatment for the prevention and reduction of withdrawal signs and symptoms in critically ill children.

Prospero register: CRD 42021274670.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危重儿科患者戒断综合征的管理和预防策略:系统综述。
目的:验证儿科重症监护室禁欲综合征的预防和治疗策略。方法:这是PubMed数据库®、Lilacs、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane、Cinahl、Cochran数据库系统综述和CENTRAL的系统综述。本综述采用三步搜索策略,方案在PROSPERO(CRD42021274670)中获得批准。结果:分析中包括12篇文章。纳入的研究之间存在很大的异质性,尤其是关于镇静和镇痛的治疗方案。咪唑安定的剂量范围从0.05mg/kg/小时到0.3mg/kg/小时。吗啡在研究之间的差异也很大,从10mcg/kg/小时到30mcg/kg/时。在12项选定的研究中,识别戒断症状最常用的量表是索菲亚观察性戒断症状量表。在三项研究中,由于实施不同的方案,在戒断综合征的预防和管理方面存在统计学上的显著差异(p<0.01和p<0.001)。需要更多的研究来提供更有力的证据,证明最合适的治疗方法可以预防和减少危重儿童的戒断症状和体征。Prospero注册号:CRD 42021274670。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Patient-level costs of central line-associated bloodstream infections caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms in a public intensive care unit in Brazil: a retrospective cohort study Critical COVID-19 and neurological dysfunction - a direct comparative analysis between SARS-CoV-2 and other infectious pathogens. Reply to: Epistaxis as a complication of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in adults. Robust, maintainable, emergency invasive mechanical ventilator. Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1