Olfactory training: effects of multisensory integration, attention towards odors and physical activity.

IF 2.8 4区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Chemical Senses Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1093/chemse/bjad037
Zetian Li, Abriat Anne, Thomas Hummel
{"title":"Olfactory training: effects of multisensory integration, attention towards odors and physical activity.","authors":"Zetian Li, Abriat Anne, Thomas Hummel","doi":"10.1093/chemse/bjad037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Olfactory training (OT) has been shown to be of value in the treatment of olfactory dysfunction. The present study aimed to investigate whether the efficacy of OT could be modulated with multisensory integration, attention towards odors, odor complexity, or physical activity assessed with a questionnaire. One hundred healthy participants were recruited and divided into 4 groups. Except for controls (n = 26, mean age ± SD = 36 ± 15 years) all participants performed OT 4 times a day. In the \"video\" group (n = 26, age 39 ± 19 years) OT was performed while watching specific and congruent video sequences. In the \"counter\" group (n = 24, 38 ± 17 years) participants additionally counted the number of odors 1 day per week, and in the \"training only\" group no additional measures were taken in addition to OT (n = 24, 38 ± 20 years). \"Single-molecule\" odorants or \"complex mixtures\" were distributed randomly for training stimulation. Sniffin' sticks tests (odor identification, odor discrimination, and odor threshold), cognitive tests, and a series of scales were measured at both baseline and after 3 months of OT. The degree of physical activity was recorded with a questionnaire. Olfactory function improved in the video and counter groups after OT, especially for odor threshold and discrimination. Yet, odor complexity and the degree of physical activity had limited effects on olfactory improvement after OT. Both multisensory interaction and attention towards odors plus OT appeared to facilitate improvement of olfactory function in healthy individuals compared with OT alone and controls, which could provide new promising treatments for clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9771,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Senses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Senses","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjad037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Olfactory training (OT) has been shown to be of value in the treatment of olfactory dysfunction. The present study aimed to investigate whether the efficacy of OT could be modulated with multisensory integration, attention towards odors, odor complexity, or physical activity assessed with a questionnaire. One hundred healthy participants were recruited and divided into 4 groups. Except for controls (n = 26, mean age ± SD = 36 ± 15 years) all participants performed OT 4 times a day. In the "video" group (n = 26, age 39 ± 19 years) OT was performed while watching specific and congruent video sequences. In the "counter" group (n = 24, 38 ± 17 years) participants additionally counted the number of odors 1 day per week, and in the "training only" group no additional measures were taken in addition to OT (n = 24, 38 ± 20 years). "Single-molecule" odorants or "complex mixtures" were distributed randomly for training stimulation. Sniffin' sticks tests (odor identification, odor discrimination, and odor threshold), cognitive tests, and a series of scales were measured at both baseline and after 3 months of OT. The degree of physical activity was recorded with a questionnaire. Olfactory function improved in the video and counter groups after OT, especially for odor threshold and discrimination. Yet, odor complexity and the degree of physical activity had limited effects on olfactory improvement after OT. Both multisensory interaction and attention towards odors plus OT appeared to facilitate improvement of olfactory function in healthy individuals compared with OT alone and controls, which could provide new promising treatments for clinical applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嗅觉训练:多感官整合、对气味的关注和身体活动的影响。
嗅觉训练(OT)已被证明在治疗嗅觉功能障碍方面具有价值。本研究旨在调查OT的疗效是否可以通过多感官整合、对气味的关注、气味的复杂性或通过问卷评估的体育活动来调节。100名健康参与者被招募并分为4组。除了控制(n = 26岁,平均年龄 ± SD = 36 ± 15年),所有参与者每天进行4次OT。在“视频”组(n = 26岁,39岁 ± 19年)在观看特定且一致的视频序列的同时进行OT。在“计数器”组(n = 24、38 ± 17年)的参与者每周1天额外计算气味的数量,在“仅训练”组中,除了OT(n = 24、38 ± 20年)。“单分子”气味剂或“复杂混合物”被随机分配用于训练刺激。嗅觉棒测试(气味识别、气味辨别和气味阈值)、认知测试和一系列量表在基线和OT 3个月后进行测量。用问卷记录身体活动的程度。OT后,视频组和计数器组的嗅觉功能有所改善,尤其是气味阈值和辨别能力。然而,气味复杂性和身体活动程度对OT后嗅觉改善的影响有限。与单独使用OT和对照组相比,多感官相互作用和对气味的关注加上OT似乎有助于改善健康个体的嗅觉功能,这可能为临床应用提供新的有前景的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Senses
Chemical Senses 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
25
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Senses publishes original research and review papers on all aspects of chemoreception in both humans and animals. An important part of the journal''s coverage is devoted to techniques and the development and application of new methods for investigating chemoreception and chemosensory structures.
期刊最新文献
The role of TRPA1 and TRPV1 in the perception of astringency. Psychometric validity of the sum score of the Sniffin' Sticks-Extended Test. Olfactory receptor neurons are sensitive to stimulus onset asynchrony: Implications for odour source discrimination. Novel Gurmarin-like Peptides from Gymnema sylvestre and their Interactions with the Sweet Taste Receptor T1R2/T1R3 How conspecific and allospecific eggs and larvae drive oviposition preference in Drosophila
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1