Anti-emetic effects of thalidomide: Evidence, mechanism of action, and future directions

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Current Research in Pharmacology and Drug Discovery Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.crphar.2022.100138
Paul L.R. Andrews , Robin S.B. Williams , Gareth J. Sanger
{"title":"Anti-emetic effects of thalidomide: Evidence, mechanism of action, and future directions","authors":"Paul L.R. Andrews ,&nbsp;Robin S.B. Williams ,&nbsp;Gareth J. Sanger","doi":"10.1016/j.crphar.2022.100138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The rationale for using thalidomide (THD) as a treatment for nausea and vomiting during pregnancy in the late 1950s appears to have been based on its sedative or hypnotic properties. In contrast to contemporaneous studies on the anti-emetic activity of phenothiazines, we were unable to identify publications reporting preclinical or clinical evaluation of THD as an anti-emetic. Our survey of the literature revealed a clinical study in 1965 showing THD reduced vomiting in cancer chemotherapy which was substantiated by similar studies from 2000, particularly showing efficacy in the delayed phase of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. To identify the mechanism(s) potentially involved in thalidomide's anti-emetic activity we reviewed its pharmacology in the light of nausea and vomiting mechanisms and their pharmacology with a particular emphasis on chemotherapy and pregnancy. The process identified the following potential mechanisms: reduced secretion of Growth Differentiation Factor 15, suppression of inflammation/prostaglandin production, downregulation of cytotoxic drug induced upregulation of iNOS, and modulation of BK (K<sub>Ca</sub>1.1) channels and GABA<sub>A</sub>/glutamate transmission at critical points in the emetic pathways (nucleus tractus solitarius, area postrema). We propose ways to investigate these hypothesized mechanisms and discuss the associated challenges (e.g., objective quantification of nausea) in addition to some of the more general aspects of developing novel drugs to treat nausea and vomiting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10877,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Pharmacology and Drug Discovery","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8d/16/main.PMC9780081.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Pharmacology and Drug Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259025712200058X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The rationale for using thalidomide (THD) as a treatment for nausea and vomiting during pregnancy in the late 1950s appears to have been based on its sedative or hypnotic properties. In contrast to contemporaneous studies on the anti-emetic activity of phenothiazines, we were unable to identify publications reporting preclinical or clinical evaluation of THD as an anti-emetic. Our survey of the literature revealed a clinical study in 1965 showing THD reduced vomiting in cancer chemotherapy which was substantiated by similar studies from 2000, particularly showing efficacy in the delayed phase of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. To identify the mechanism(s) potentially involved in thalidomide's anti-emetic activity we reviewed its pharmacology in the light of nausea and vomiting mechanisms and their pharmacology with a particular emphasis on chemotherapy and pregnancy. The process identified the following potential mechanisms: reduced secretion of Growth Differentiation Factor 15, suppression of inflammation/prostaglandin production, downregulation of cytotoxic drug induced upregulation of iNOS, and modulation of BK (KCa1.1) channels and GABAA/glutamate transmission at critical points in the emetic pathways (nucleus tractus solitarius, area postrema). We propose ways to investigate these hypothesized mechanisms and discuss the associated challenges (e.g., objective quantification of nausea) in addition to some of the more general aspects of developing novel drugs to treat nausea and vomiting.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙利度胺的止吐作用:证据、作用机制和未来方向
20世纪50年代末,使用沙利度胺(THD)治疗妊娠期恶心和呕吐的基本原理似乎是基于它的镇静或催眠特性。与同期关于吩噻嗪类药物止吐活性的研究相比,我们无法确定报告THD作为止吐剂的临床前或临床评估的出版物。我们对文献的调查显示,1965年的一项临床研究表明,THD减少了癌症化疗中的呕吐,这一研究在2000年的类似研究中得到了证实,特别是在化疗引起的延迟期恶心和呕吐中显示出疗效。为了确定沙利度胺止吐作用的潜在机制,我们根据恶心和呕吐机制及其药理学对其进行了回顾,并特别强调了化疗和妊娠。该过程确定了以下潜在机制:减少生长分化因子15的分泌,抑制炎症/前列腺素的产生,下调细胞毒性药物诱导的iNOS上调,以及调节BK (KCa1.1)通道和GABAA/谷氨酸在呕吐通路关键点(孤束核,后脑区)的传递。我们提出了研究这些假设机制的方法,并讨论了相关的挑战(例如,恶心的客观量化),以及开发治疗恶心和呕吐的新药的一些更一般的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Research in Pharmacology and Drug Discovery
Current Research in Pharmacology and Drug Discovery Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Development of Recombinant Antibody by Yeast Surface Display Technology Papaverine attenuates the progression of alpha naphthylisothiocyanate induce cholestasis in rats Long-term effects of neonatal pain and sucrose treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1