The Fallout of Catastrophic Technogenic Emissions of Toxic Gases Can Negatively Affect Covid-19 Clinical Course.

IF 2 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY Acta Naturae Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.32607/actanaturae.11754
G Succi, W Pedrycz, A P Bogachuk, A G Tormasov, A A Belogurov, A Spallone
{"title":"The Fallout of Catastrophic Technogenic Emissions of Toxic Gases Can Negatively Affect Covid-19 Clinical Course.","authors":"G Succi,&nbsp;W Pedrycz,&nbsp;A P Bogachuk,&nbsp;A G Tormasov,&nbsp;A A Belogurov,&nbsp;A Spallone","doi":"10.32607/actanaturae.11754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The coronavirus D-19 (Covid-19) pandemic has shaken almost every country in the world: as we stand, 6,3 million deaths from the infection have already been recorded, 167,000 and 380,000 of which are in Italy and the Russian Federation, respectively. In the first wave of the pandemic, Italy suffered an abnormally high death toll. A detailed analysis of available epidemiological data suggests that that rate was shockingly high in the Northern regions and in Lombardy, in particular, whilst in the southern region the situation was less dire. This inexplicably high mortality rate in conditions of a very well-developed health care system such as the one in Lombardy - recognized as one of the best in Italy - certainly cries for a convincing explanation. In 1976, the small city of Seveso, Lombardy, experienced a release of dioxin into the atmosphere after a massive technogenic accident. The immediate effects of the industrial disaster did not become apparent until a surge in the number of tumors in the affected population in the subsequent years. In this paper, we endeavor to prove our hypothesis that the release of dioxin was a negative cofactor that contributed to a worsening of the clinical course of COVID-19 in Lombardy.</p>","PeriodicalId":6989,"journal":{"name":"Acta Naturae","volume":"14 4","pages":"101-110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9844090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Naturae","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32607/actanaturae.11754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coronavirus D-19 (Covid-19) pandemic has shaken almost every country in the world: as we stand, 6,3 million deaths from the infection have already been recorded, 167,000 and 380,000 of which are in Italy and the Russian Federation, respectively. In the first wave of the pandemic, Italy suffered an abnormally high death toll. A detailed analysis of available epidemiological data suggests that that rate was shockingly high in the Northern regions and in Lombardy, in particular, whilst in the southern region the situation was less dire. This inexplicably high mortality rate in conditions of a very well-developed health care system such as the one in Lombardy - recognized as one of the best in Italy - certainly cries for a convincing explanation. In 1976, the small city of Seveso, Lombardy, experienced a release of dioxin into the atmosphere after a massive technogenic accident. The immediate effects of the industrial disaster did not become apparent until a surge in the number of tumors in the affected population in the subsequent years. In this paper, we endeavor to prove our hypothesis that the release of dioxin was a negative cofactor that contributed to a worsening of the clinical course of COVID-19 in Lombardy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灾难性技术性有毒气体排放的影响可能对新冠肺炎临床进程产生负面影响。
冠状病毒D-19(新冠肺炎)大流行几乎震撼了世界上每个国家:目前,已有630万人死于该感染,其中意大利和俄罗斯联邦分别有16.7万人和38万人。在第一波疫情中,意大利的死亡人数异常高。对现有流行病学数据的详细分析表明,北部地区,尤其是伦巴第大区的发病率高得惊人,而南部地区的情况则不那么可怕。在像伦巴第这样一个被公认为意大利最好的医疗保健系统的条件下,这种令人费解的高死亡率当然需要一个令人信服的解释。1976年,伦巴第的塞维索小城市在一场大规模的技术事故后,二恶英释放到大气中。工业灾难的直接影响直到随后几年受影响人群中的肿瘤数量激增才变得明显。在这篇论文中,我们试图证明我们的假设,即二恶英的释放是导致新冠肺炎临床进程恶化的负辅因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Naturae
Acta Naturae 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Naturae is an international journal on life sciences based in Moscow, Russia. Our goal is to present scientific work and discovery in molecular biology, biochemistry, biomedical disciplines and biotechnology. These fields represent the most important priorities for the research and engineering development both in Russia and worldwide. Acta Naturae is also a periodical for those who are curious in various aspects of biotechnological business, innovations in pharmaceutical areas, intellectual property protection and social consequences of scientific progress. The journal publishes analytical industrial surveys focused on the development of different spheres of modern life science and technology. Being a radically new and totally unique journal in Russia, Acta Naturae is useful to both representatives of fundamental research and experts in applied sciences.
期刊最新文献
Insights into the Functioning of the D-amino Acid Transaminase from Haliscomenobacter Hydrossis via a Structural and Spectral Analysis of its Complex with 3-Aminooxypropionic Acid. Reconstruction of the Reaction of Andalusicin Lantibiotic Modification by Lanthionine Synthetase AncKC in a Heterologous Escherichia coli System. Specific Activation of the Expression of Growth Factor Genes in Expi293F Human Cells Using CRISPR/Cas9-SAM Technology Increases Their Proliferation. The Correlation Patterns of miRNA Expression with Targeted mRNA Transcripts in Glioma Patients with Wild-Type and Mutated Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) Genotypes. Evolutionary Perspectives on Human-Artificial Intelligence Convergence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1