Reusing Biomedical Data as Agreed - Towards Structured Metadata for Data Use Agreements.

Q3 Health Professions Studies in Health Technology and Informatics Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.3233/SHTI230690
Caroline Bönisch, Sabine Hanß, Nicolai Spicher, Ulrich Sax, Dagmar Krefting
{"title":"Reusing Biomedical Data as Agreed - Towards Structured Metadata for Data Use Agreements.","authors":"Caroline Bönisch,&nbsp;Sabine Hanß,&nbsp;Nicolai Spicher,&nbsp;Ulrich Sax,&nbsp;Dagmar Krefting","doi":"10.3233/SHTI230690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With increasing availability of reusable biomedical data - from cohort studies to clinical routine data, data re-users face the problem to manage transferred data according to the heterogeneous data use agreements. While structured metadata is addressed in many contexts including informed consent, contracts are to date still unstructured text documents. In particular within collaborative and active working groups the actual usage agreement's regulations are highly relevant for the daily practice - can I share the data with colleagues from the same university or the same research network, can they be stored on a PHD student's laptop, can I store the data for further approved data usage requests?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this article, we inspect and review seven different data usage agreements. We focus on digital data that is copied and transferred to the requester's environment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 24 metadata items in the four main categories data usage, storage, and sharing, as well as publication of results.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While the topics are largely overlap in the data use agreements, the actual regulations of the topics are diverse. Although we do not explicitly investigate trusted research environments, where data is offered within an analytics platform, we consider them a as subgroup, where most of the practical questions from the data scientist's perspective also arise.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With a limited set of structured metadata items, data scientists could have information about the data use agreement at hand along with the transferred data in an easily accessible way.</p>","PeriodicalId":39242,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Health Technology and Informatics","volume":"307 ","pages":"31-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Health Technology and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI230690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: With increasing availability of reusable biomedical data - from cohort studies to clinical routine data, data re-users face the problem to manage transferred data according to the heterogeneous data use agreements. While structured metadata is addressed in many contexts including informed consent, contracts are to date still unstructured text documents. In particular within collaborative and active working groups the actual usage agreement's regulations are highly relevant for the daily practice - can I share the data with colleagues from the same university or the same research network, can they be stored on a PHD student's laptop, can I store the data for further approved data usage requests?

Methods: In this article, we inspect and review seven different data usage agreements. We focus on digital data that is copied and transferred to the requester's environment.

Results: We identified 24 metadata items in the four main categories data usage, storage, and sharing, as well as publication of results.

Discussion: While the topics are largely overlap in the data use agreements, the actual regulations of the topics are diverse. Although we do not explicitly investigate trusted research environments, where data is offered within an analytics platform, we consider them a as subgroup, where most of the practical questions from the data scientist's perspective also arise.

Conclusion: With a limited set of structured metadata items, data scientists could have information about the data use agreement at hand along with the transferred data in an easily accessible way.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
按照约定重用生物医学数据——迈向数据使用协议的结构化元数据。
导读:随着生物医学数据可重用性的增加——从队列研究到临床常规数据,数据重用者面临着根据异构数据使用协议管理传输数据的问题。虽然在包括知情同意在内的许多情况下都涉及结构化元数据,但迄今为止,合同仍然是非结构化的文本文档。特别是在协作和活跃的工作组中,实际使用协议的规定与日常实践高度相关——我可以与来自同一所大学或同一研究网络的同事共享数据吗?它们可以存储在博士生的笔记本电脑上吗?我可以存储数据以供进一步批准数据使用请求吗?方法:在本文中,我们检查和审查了七种不同的数据使用协议。我们关注的是复制并传输到请求者环境的数字数据。结果:我们确定了数据使用、存储和共享以及结果发布四个主要类别中的24个元数据项。讨论:虽然数据使用协议中的主题有很大的重叠,但主题的实际规定是多种多样的。虽然我们没有明确调查可信的研究环境,其中数据是在分析平台内提供的,但我们认为它们是一个子组,从数据科学家的角度来看,大多数实际问题也会出现。结论:使用有限的结构化元数据项集,数据科学家可以以一种易于访问的方式获得有关数据使用协议的信息以及传输的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1463
期刊介绍: This book series was started in 1990 to promote research conducted under the auspices of the EC programmes’ Advanced Informatics in Medicine (AIM) and Biomedical and Health Research (BHR) bioengineering branch. A driving aspect of international health informatics is that telecommunication technology, rehabilitative technology, intelligent home technology and many other components are moving together and form one integrated world of information and communication media.
期刊最新文献
Virtual Reality Assessment Reveals Myopic Regression After ICL Implantation in High Myopia. Construction of Guideline-Based Decision Tree for Medication Recommendation. Systemic Risk Management Plan for Electronic Medical Records (EMR): Why and How? Mental Health Patient Portals Aimed at Depression: A Picture Close to Reality. Mettertron - Bridging Metadata Repositories and Terminology Servers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1