Risk factors for suicide in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological autopsy studies.

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Evidence Based Mental Health Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1136/ebmental-2022-300549
Louis Favril, Rongqin Yu, Abdo Uyar, Michael Sharpe, Seena Fazel
{"title":"Risk factors for suicide in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological autopsy studies.","authors":"Louis Favril,&nbsp;Rongqin Yu,&nbsp;Abdo Uyar,&nbsp;Michael Sharpe,&nbsp;Seena Fazel","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2022-300549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Question: </strong>Effective prevention of suicide requires a comprehensive understanding of risk factors.</p><p><strong>Study selection and analysis: </strong>Five databases were systematically searched to identify psychological autopsy studies (published up to February 2022) that reported on risk factors for suicide mortality among adults in the general population. Effect sizes were pooled as odds ratios (ORs) using random-effects models for each risk factor examined in at least three independent samples.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 37 case-control studies from 23 countries were included, providing data on 40 risk factors in 5633 cases and 7101 controls. The magnitude of effect sizes varied substantially both between and within risk factor domains. Clinical factors had the strongest associations with suicide, including any mental disorder (OR=13.1, 95% CI 9.9 to 17.4) and a history of self-harm (OR=10.1, 95% CI 6.6 to 15.6). By comparison, effect sizes were smaller for other domains relating to sociodemographic status, family history, and adverse life events (OR range 2-5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A wide range of predisposing and precipitating factors are associated with suicide among adults in the general population, but with clear differences in their relative strength.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42021232878.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9685708/pdf/","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2022-300549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Question: Effective prevention of suicide requires a comprehensive understanding of risk factors.

Study selection and analysis: Five databases were systematically searched to identify psychological autopsy studies (published up to February 2022) that reported on risk factors for suicide mortality among adults in the general population. Effect sizes were pooled as odds ratios (ORs) using random-effects models for each risk factor examined in at least three independent samples.

Findings: A total of 37 case-control studies from 23 countries were included, providing data on 40 risk factors in 5633 cases and 7101 controls. The magnitude of effect sizes varied substantially both between and within risk factor domains. Clinical factors had the strongest associations with suicide, including any mental disorder (OR=13.1, 95% CI 9.9 to 17.4) and a history of self-harm (OR=10.1, 95% CI 6.6 to 15.6). By comparison, effect sizes were smaller for other domains relating to sociodemographic status, family history, and adverse life events (OR range 2-5).

Conclusions: A wide range of predisposing and precipitating factors are associated with suicide among adults in the general population, but with clear differences in their relative strength.

Prospero registration number: CRD42021232878.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人自杀的危险因素:心理解剖研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
问:有效预防自杀需要对危险因素有全面的了解。研究选择和分析:系统地检索了五个数据库,以确定心理尸检研究(发表至2022年2月),这些研究报告了普通人群中成年人自杀死亡的危险因素。使用随机效应模型对至少三个独立样本中检查的每个风险因素进行优势比(or)合并效应大小。研究结果:共纳入了来自23个国家的37项病例对照研究,提供了5633例病例和7101例对照中40种危险因素的数据。效应大小的大小在风险因素域之间和域内都有很大差异。临床因素与自杀的相关性最强,包括任何精神障碍(OR=13.1, 95% CI 9.9 ~ 17.4)和自残史(OR=10.1, 95% CI 6.6 ~ 15.6)。相比之下,与社会人口状况、家族史和不良生活事件相关的其他领域的效应量较小(OR范围为2-5)。结论:在一般人群中,多种诱发因素和诱发因素与成年人自杀有关,但其相对强度有明显差异。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42021232878。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Mental Health alerts clinicians to important advances in treatment, diagnosis, aetiology, prognosis, continuing education, economic evaluation and qualitative research in mental health. Published by the British Psychological Society, the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the BMJ Publishing Group the journal surveys a wide range of international medical journals applying strict criteria for the quality and validity of research. Clinicians assess the relevance of the best studies and the key details of these essential studies are presented in a succinct, informative abstract with an expert commentary on its clinical application.Evidence-Based Mental Health is a multidisciplinary, quarterly publication.
期刊最新文献
Vitruvian plot: a visualisation tool for multiple outcomes in network meta-analysis. Important adverse events to be evaluated in antidepressant trials and meta-analyses in depression: a large international preference study including patients and healthcare professionals. Comparison of prediction methods for treatment continuation of antipsychotics in children and adolescents with schizophrenia. Components of smartphone cognitive-behavioural therapy for subthreshold depression among 1093 university students: a factorial trial. Associations between antipsychotics and risk of violent crimes and suicidal behaviour in personality disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1