A Novel Flexible Fixation Method for Syndesmotic Injury.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Foot & Ankle International Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-17 DOI:10.1177/10711007231177044
Quan Yu Dong, Yong Wu, Chen Han Wang, Yong Wook Park
{"title":"A Novel Flexible Fixation Method for Syndesmotic Injury.","authors":"Quan Yu Dong,&nbsp;Yong Wu,&nbsp;Chen Han Wang,&nbsp;Yong Wook Park","doi":"10.1177/10711007231177044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the results and the safety of a novel fixation method we developed for syndesmosis injuries that we call the \"embrace\" technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March 2018 and October 2020, a total of 67 patients with ankle fractures and syndesmotic injuries underwent syndesmosis fixation with the embrace technique at our institute. Plain radiographs and computed tomographic (CT) scans were obtained preoperatively. Postoperative radiographic assessment included anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs and CT scans of both ankles. Additionally, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score, Olerud-Molander Ankle Score, and visual analog scale (VAS) score were used for postoperative assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 27.6 ± 10.9 (range, 14-56) years. The mean follow-up time was 30.3 ± 6.2 (range, 24-48) months. There were no malreductions indicated by any CT parameter except fibular rotation in a postoperative comparison between 2 sides. We found significant preoperative-postoperative changes in anterior difference, posterior difference, and fibular rotation but no significant preoperative-postoperative difference in fibular translation. There was no significant postoperative difference between the affected-side and normal-side measurements of any parameter. Complications included delayed wound healing, lateral pain because of wire knot irritation (11.9%), and medial fiber wire irritation (7.5%). The mean AOFAS, Olerud-Molander, and VAS scores at the last follow-up were 94.4 ± 6.8 (range, 84-100), 95.4 ± 6.1 (range, 80-100), and 0.68 ± 1.0 (range, 0-3) points, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our cohort, this novel technique proved to be an effective method for syndesmosis fixation in patients with ankle fractures associated with very good radiologic and patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":12446,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle International","volume":"44 9","pages":"854-861"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007231177044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the results and the safety of a novel fixation method we developed for syndesmosis injuries that we call the "embrace" technique.

Methods: Between March 2018 and October 2020, a total of 67 patients with ankle fractures and syndesmotic injuries underwent syndesmosis fixation with the embrace technique at our institute. Plain radiographs and computed tomographic (CT) scans were obtained preoperatively. Postoperative radiographic assessment included anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs and CT scans of both ankles. Additionally, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score, Olerud-Molander Ankle Score, and visual analog scale (VAS) score were used for postoperative assessment.

Results: The mean age was 27.6 ± 10.9 (range, 14-56) years. The mean follow-up time was 30.3 ± 6.2 (range, 24-48) months. There were no malreductions indicated by any CT parameter except fibular rotation in a postoperative comparison between 2 sides. We found significant preoperative-postoperative changes in anterior difference, posterior difference, and fibular rotation but no significant preoperative-postoperative difference in fibular translation. There was no significant postoperative difference between the affected-side and normal-side measurements of any parameter. Complications included delayed wound healing, lateral pain because of wire knot irritation (11.9%), and medial fiber wire irritation (7.5%). The mean AOFAS, Olerud-Molander, and VAS scores at the last follow-up were 94.4 ± 6.8 (range, 84-100), 95.4 ± 6.1 (range, 80-100), and 0.68 ± 1.0 (range, 0-3) points, respectively.

Conclusion: In our cohort, this novel technique proved to be an effective method for syndesmosis fixation in patients with ankle fractures associated with very good radiologic and patient-reported outcomes.

Level of evidence: Level IV, case series.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新的柔性固定方法治疗联合韧带损伤。
背景:本研究旨在评估我们为联合韧带损伤开发的一种新的固定方法的结果和安全性,我们称之为“拥抱”技术。方法:2018年3月至2020年10月,我所共有67例踝关节骨折和联合韧带损伤患者采用环抱技术进行联合韧带固定。术前进行平片和计算机断层扫描。术后放射学评估包括前后(AP)和侧位放射学以及双脚踝的CT扫描。此外,美国足踝矫形学会(AOFAS)踝后足评分、Olerud Molander踝关节评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分用于术后评估。结果:平均年龄27.6岁 ± 10.9岁(范围14-56岁)。平均随访时间为30.3 ± 6.2(范围24-48)个月。在术后两侧的比较中,除腓骨旋转外,任何CT参数均未显示复位不良。我们发现,术前、术后的差异和腓骨旋转有显著的变化,但腓骨平移没有显著的术前和术后差异。术后患侧和正常侧的任何参数测量值均无显著差异。并发症包括伤口愈合延迟、因线结刺激引起的外侧疼痛(11.9%)和内侧纤维线刺激(7.5%)。最后一次随访的平均AOFAS、Olerud Molander和VAS评分为94.4 ± 6.8(范围,84-100),95.4 ± 6.1(范围,80-100)和0.68 ± 1.0(范围,0-3)个点。结论:在我们的队列中,这项新技术被证明是治疗踝关节骨折患者联合韧带固定的有效方法,并具有良好的放射学和患者报告的结果。证据级别:四级,案件系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle International
Foot & Ankle International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
144
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Foot & Ankle International (FAI), in publication since 1980, is the official journal of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS). This monthly medical journal emphasizes surgical and medical management as it relates to the foot and ankle with a specific focus on reconstructive, trauma, and sports-related conditions utilizing the latest technological advances. FAI offers original, clinically oriented, peer-reviewed research articles presenting new approaches to foot and ankle pathology and treatment, current case reviews, and technique tips addressing the management of complex problems. This journal is an ideal resource for highly-trained orthopaedic foot and ankle specialists and allied health care providers. The journal’s Founding Editor, Melvin H. Jahss, MD (deceased), served from 1980-1988. He was followed by Kenneth A. Johnson, MD (deceased) from 1988-1993; Lowell D. Lutter, MD (deceased) from 1993-2004; and E. Greer Richardson, MD from 2005-2007. David B. Thordarson, MD, assumed the role of Editor-in-Chief in 2008. The journal focuses on the following areas of interest: • Surgery • Wound care • Bone healing • Pain management • In-office orthotic systems • Diabetes • Sports medicine
期刊最新文献
Education Calendar Total Ankle Arthroplasty as a Correction Tool for Foot Deformities: Analyzing the Impact on Medial Column Alignment Adaptation Through Weightbearing Computed Tomography. Plantar Fascia Thickness and Stiffness in Healthy Individuals vs Patients With Plantar Fasciitis. Education Calendar Education Calendar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1