Biomechanical Comparison of Nonlocked Minimally Invasive and Locked Open Achilles Tendon Simulated Rupture Repairs.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Foot & Ankle International Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-16 DOI:10.1177/10711007231178819
Bavornrit Chuckpaiwong, Richard R Glisson, Federico G Usuelli, Naji S Madi, Mark E Easley
{"title":"Biomechanical Comparison of Nonlocked Minimally Invasive and Locked Open Achilles Tendon Simulated Rupture Repairs.","authors":"Bavornrit Chuckpaiwong,&nbsp;Richard R Glisson,&nbsp;Federico G Usuelli,&nbsp;Naji S Madi,&nbsp;Mark E Easley","doi":"10.1177/10711007231178819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open repair of Achilles tendon ruptures is associated with a risk of infection and other wound complications. Although percutaneous repairs reduce these complications, they may increase the risk of nerve injury. This study was designed to determine whether a percutaneous nonlocking repair can approach the gapping resistance offered by a standard open repair under conditions approximating typical postoperative physiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten pairs of cadavers Achilles tendons were transected in situ 5 cm above the insertion. One tendon from each pair was repaired using an open 4-strand Krackow locking loop, and the contralateral tendon was repaired with the Achillon system using the same suture material. Displacement transducers were attached to the medial, lateral, anterior, and posterior aspects of the tendon, spanning the repair. Each tendon underwent 1000 tensile loading cycles to 86.5 N, simulating passive ankle range-of-motion physiotherapy. Gapping was documented on the 1st, 50th, 100th, 500th, and 1000th cycles. The ultimate tensile strength of each repaired tendon was then measured by distracting until gross failure occurred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gapping of the percutaneous repairs exceeded that of conventional open repairs on the first, 500th, and 1000th load cycles. All 10 conventionally repaired tendons withstood 1000 load cycles without gross failure, but 4 of 10 percutaneous minimally invasive repairs failed, one on the 9th load cycle and the others between the 100th and 500th cycles. On average, tendons repaired with the open technique withstood 66% greater tensile load in failure testing than those repaired with the percutaneous technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Open Krackow Achilles tendon repairs may better withstand more aggressive postoperative physiotherapy than nonlocked percutaneous repairs.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The study suggests that surgeons should consider locking suture approaches to avoid loss of repair integrity with early motion.</p>","PeriodicalId":12446,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle International","volume":"44 9","pages":"913-921"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007231178819","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Open repair of Achilles tendon ruptures is associated with a risk of infection and other wound complications. Although percutaneous repairs reduce these complications, they may increase the risk of nerve injury. This study was designed to determine whether a percutaneous nonlocking repair can approach the gapping resistance offered by a standard open repair under conditions approximating typical postoperative physiotherapy.

Methods: Ten pairs of cadavers Achilles tendons were transected in situ 5 cm above the insertion. One tendon from each pair was repaired using an open 4-strand Krackow locking loop, and the contralateral tendon was repaired with the Achillon system using the same suture material. Displacement transducers were attached to the medial, lateral, anterior, and posterior aspects of the tendon, spanning the repair. Each tendon underwent 1000 tensile loading cycles to 86.5 N, simulating passive ankle range-of-motion physiotherapy. Gapping was documented on the 1st, 50th, 100th, 500th, and 1000th cycles. The ultimate tensile strength of each repaired tendon was then measured by distracting until gross failure occurred.

Results: Gapping of the percutaneous repairs exceeded that of conventional open repairs on the first, 500th, and 1000th load cycles. All 10 conventionally repaired tendons withstood 1000 load cycles without gross failure, but 4 of 10 percutaneous minimally invasive repairs failed, one on the 9th load cycle and the others between the 100th and 500th cycles. On average, tendons repaired with the open technique withstood 66% greater tensile load in failure testing than those repaired with the percutaneous technique.

Conclusion: Open Krackow Achilles tendon repairs may better withstand more aggressive postoperative physiotherapy than nonlocked percutaneous repairs.

Clinical relevance: The study suggests that surgeons should consider locking suture approaches to avoid loss of repair integrity with early motion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非锁定微创和锁定开放性跟腱模拟断裂修复的生物力学比较。
背景:跟腱断裂的开放性修复与感染和其他伤口并发症的风险有关。尽管经皮修复可以减少这些并发症,但它们可能会增加神经损伤的风险。本研究旨在确定在接近典型术后物理治疗的条件下,经皮非锁定修复是否可以接近标准开放修复所提供的间隙阻力。方法:10对尸体跟腱进行原位横断 插入物上方cm处。使用开放的4股Krackow锁定环修复每对肌腱中的一根,使用相同的缝合材料使用Achillon系统修复对侧肌腱。位移传感器连接到肌腱的内侧、外侧、前部和后部,横跨修复。每根肌腱都经历了1000次拉伸载荷循环,达到86.5 N、 模拟被动踝关节活动范围理疗。在第1、第50、第100、第500和第1000次循环中记录了间隙。然后通过分散测量每个修复肌腱的极限抗拉强度,直到发生严重失效。结果:在第一次、第500次和第1000次负荷循环中,经皮修复的间隙超过了常规开放修复。所有10根常规修复的肌腱都能承受1000个载荷循环,没有出现严重故障,但10根经皮微创修复中有4根失败,一根在第9个载荷循环中,另一根在100到500个循环之间。平均而言,在失效测试中,用开放技术修复的肌腱比用经皮技术修复的腱承受的拉伸载荷高66%。结论:开放性Krackow跟腱修复术可能比非封闭性经皮修复术更能承受更积极的术后物理治疗。临床相关性:该研究表明,外科医生应考虑锁定缝合方法,以避免早期运动导致修复完整性丧失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle International
Foot & Ankle International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
144
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Foot & Ankle International (FAI), in publication since 1980, is the official journal of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS). This monthly medical journal emphasizes surgical and medical management as it relates to the foot and ankle with a specific focus on reconstructive, trauma, and sports-related conditions utilizing the latest technological advances. FAI offers original, clinically oriented, peer-reviewed research articles presenting new approaches to foot and ankle pathology and treatment, current case reviews, and technique tips addressing the management of complex problems. This journal is an ideal resource for highly-trained orthopaedic foot and ankle specialists and allied health care providers. The journal’s Founding Editor, Melvin H. Jahss, MD (deceased), served from 1980-1988. He was followed by Kenneth A. Johnson, MD (deceased) from 1988-1993; Lowell D. Lutter, MD (deceased) from 1993-2004; and E. Greer Richardson, MD from 2005-2007. David B. Thordarson, MD, assumed the role of Editor-in-Chief in 2008. The journal focuses on the following areas of interest: • Surgery • Wound care • Bone healing • Pain management • In-office orthotic systems • Diabetes • Sports medicine
期刊最新文献
Education Calendar Total Ankle Arthroplasty as a Correction Tool for Foot Deformities: Analyzing the Impact on Medial Column Alignment Adaptation Through Weightbearing Computed Tomography. Plantar Fascia Thickness and Stiffness in Healthy Individuals vs Patients With Plantar Fasciitis. Education Calendar Education Calendar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1