How health literacy is taught and evaluated in dentistry, medicine, nursing, law, pharmacy, public health, and social work: a narrative review.

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Communication in Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-14 DOI:10.1080/17538068.2023.2258315
Catherine Maybury, Mary Ann Williams, Kelsie Challenger, Elisabeth Fassas, Sonia Galvan, Dominique Gelmann, Karen S Jung, Alice Yanhong Lu, Jocelyn Wang, Elsie Stines, Cynthia Baur
{"title":"How health literacy is taught and evaluated in dentistry, medicine, nursing, law, pharmacy, public health, and social work: a narrative review.","authors":"Catherine Maybury, Mary Ann Williams, Kelsie Challenger, Elisabeth Fassas, Sonia Galvan, Dominique Gelmann, Karen S Jung, Alice Yanhong Lu, Jocelyn Wang, Elsie Stines, Cynthia Baur","doi":"10.1080/17538068.2023.2258315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This narrative review examined the published peer-reviewed literature on how health literacy is taught and evaluated in seven health professional and adjacent disciplines: dentistry, medicine, nursing, law, pharmacy, public health, and social work. The study objectives were to assess how students are educated about health literacy and how their health literacy education and skills are evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study selection followed guidelines outlined in PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). We searched PubMed, CINAHL, SocINDEX (EBSCOhost), Lexis Advance and Public Health (ProQuest) for English-language publications of health literacy education studies across seven disciplines at U.S.-based institutions. Inclusion criteria included: 1) methods describing a primary health literacy educational intervention, 2) professional education in one or more of the seven disciplines, 3) educational institutions in the United States, and 4) articles published in peer-reviewed journals between 2000 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The searches yielded 44 articles. Health literacy education is evident in six of the seven studied disciplines, and varies widely in the quality, quantity, timing and mode of education and evaluation. Despite the presence of health literacy accreditation requirements, none of the seven disciplines has developed and implemented a standard, rigorous health literacy education program for students.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Graduating institutions and professional accreditation organizations that set the standards for education must lead the way by implementing upstream changes in health literacy professional education. Teaching health literacy to students in health professions is one strategy to help close gaps in patient/client professional communication for graduates and those they serve.</p>","PeriodicalId":38052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"51-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2023.2258315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This narrative review examined the published peer-reviewed literature on how health literacy is taught and evaluated in seven health professional and adjacent disciplines: dentistry, medicine, nursing, law, pharmacy, public health, and social work. The study objectives were to assess how students are educated about health literacy and how their health literacy education and skills are evaluated.

Methods: Study selection followed guidelines outlined in PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). We searched PubMed, CINAHL, SocINDEX (EBSCOhost), Lexis Advance and Public Health (ProQuest) for English-language publications of health literacy education studies across seven disciplines at U.S.-based institutions. Inclusion criteria included: 1) methods describing a primary health literacy educational intervention, 2) professional education in one or more of the seven disciplines, 3) educational institutions in the United States, and 4) articles published in peer-reviewed journals between 2000 and 2020.

Results: The searches yielded 44 articles. Health literacy education is evident in six of the seven studied disciplines, and varies widely in the quality, quantity, timing and mode of education and evaluation. Despite the presence of health literacy accreditation requirements, none of the seven disciplines has developed and implemented a standard, rigorous health literacy education program for students.

Conclusions: Graduating institutions and professional accreditation organizations that set the standards for education must lead the way by implementing upstream changes in health literacy professional education. Teaching health literacy to students in health professions is one strategy to help close gaps in patient/client professional communication for graduates and those they serve.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何在牙科、医学、护理、法律、药学、公共卫生和社会工作中教授和评估健康素养:叙述性综述。
背景:这篇叙述性综述审查了已发表的同行评审文献,这些文献涉及如何在七个卫生专业和邻近学科中教授和评估健康素养:牙科、医学、护理、法律、药学、公共卫生和社会工作。该研究的目的是评估如何对学生进行健康素养教育,以及如何评估他们的健康素养教育和技能。方法:研究选择遵循PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)中概述的指南。我们在PubMed、CINAHL、SocINDEX(EBSCOhost)、Lexis Advance和Public Health(ProQuest)上搜索了美国机构七个学科的健康素养教育研究的英文出版物。纳入标准包括:1)描述初级健康素养教育干预的方法,2)七个学科中一个或多个学科的专业教育,3)美国的教育机构,以及4)2000年至2020年间在同行评审期刊上发表的文章。结果:搜索产生了44篇文章。在所研究的七个学科中,有六个学科开展了健康素养教育,教育和评估的质量、数量、时间和模式差异很大。尽管存在健康素养认证要求,但七个学科中没有一个为学生制定和实施标准、严格的健康素养教育计划。结论:制定教育标准的毕业院校和专业认证组织必须带头实施健康素养专业教育的上游变革。向健康专业的学生教授健康知识是一种策略,有助于缩小毕业生及其服务人员在患者/客户专业沟通方面的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Communication in Healthcare
Journal of Communication in Healthcare Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Open access to pathology reports: potential harms and proposed solutions. The promise of AI in healthcare: transforming communication and decision-making for patients. Doctor on call: physician smartphone use during medical consultations. Public health professionals' views on climate change, advocacy, and health. Adaptation in communication technology utilization: caring for individuals with chronic conditions in South Asia during the Covid-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1