[An Essential Therapeutic: Occupational Therapy in GDR Psychiatric Institutions as Seen by Contemporary Witnesses].

Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-06 DOI:10.1055/a-2005-7810
Antonia Windirsch, Kathleen Haack, Hans Jörgen Grabe, Ekkehardt Kumbier
{"title":"[An Essential Therapeutic: Occupational Therapy in GDR Psychiatric Institutions as Seen by Contemporary Witnesses].","authors":"Antonia Windirsch,&nbsp;Kathleen Haack,&nbsp;Hans Jörgen Grabe,&nbsp;Ekkehardt Kumbier","doi":"10.1055/a-2005-7810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this survey of professionals working in the GDR and former patients was to help determine the role and function of occupational therapy in psychiatric institutions.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>74 contemporary witnesses were interviewed who had worked professionally in psychiatric institutions in the GDR or had been treated there in adulthood. The interviews were evaluated qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The eyewitnesses interviewed described the organisation and goals of occupational therapy as well as changes that took place over time. Occupational therapy was rated highly, as it represented an important additional therapy offering. Uniform activities and the misuse of patients' labor while neglecting their therapeutic requirements were subjected to critical assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In future, the interviews with contemporary witnesses should be included to a greater extent in investigations into the history of psychiatry. The view of the development of occupational therapy can provide valuable insights for further historical reappraisal, and contribute to our current understanding of these forms of therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2005-7810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this survey of professionals working in the GDR and former patients was to help determine the role and function of occupational therapy in psychiatric institutions.

Methodology: 74 contemporary witnesses were interviewed who had worked professionally in psychiatric institutions in the GDR or had been treated there in adulthood. The interviews were evaluated qualitatively.

Results: The eyewitnesses interviewed described the organisation and goals of occupational therapy as well as changes that took place over time. Occupational therapy was rated highly, as it represented an important additional therapy offering. Uniform activities and the misuse of patients' labor while neglecting their therapeutic requirements were subjected to critical assessment.

Conclusion: In future, the interviews with contemporary witnesses should be included to a greater extent in investigations into the history of psychiatry. The view of the development of occupational therapy can provide valuable insights for further historical reappraisal, and contribute to our current understanding of these forms of therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
[一种基本的治疗方法:当代目击者所见的GDR精神病院的职业治疗]。
目的:本调查的目的是对在GDR工作的专业人员和以前的患者进行调查,以帮助确定职业治疗在精神病院中的作用和功能。方法:采访了74名曾在民主德国精神病院专业工作或成年后在那里接受过治疗的当代证人。对访谈进行了定性评估。结果:接受采访的目击者描述了职业治疗的组织和目标,以及随着时间的推移发生的变化。职业治疗被高度评价,因为它代表了一种重要的额外治疗。对统一活动和滥用患者劳动而忽视其治疗要求的情况进行了批判性评估。结论:在未来的精神病学史调查中,应更大程度地包括对当代证人的采访。职业治疗的发展观可以为进一步的历史重新评估提供有价值的见解,并有助于我们目前对这些治疗形式的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1