Six nations: a clinical scenario comparison of systems for prisoners with psychosis in Australia, Bolivia and four European nations.

Q2 Medicine BJPsych International Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1192/bji.2022.16
Anne Aboaja, Prashant Pandurangi, Susana Almeida, Luca Castelletti, Guillermo Rivera-Arroyo, Annette Optiz-Welke, Justus Welke, Stephen Barlow
{"title":"Six nations: a clinical scenario comparison of systems for prisoners with psychosis in Australia, Bolivia and four European nations.","authors":"Anne Aboaja,&nbsp;Prashant Pandurangi,&nbsp;Susana Almeida,&nbsp;Luca Castelletti,&nbsp;Guillermo Rivera-Arroyo,&nbsp;Annette Optiz-Welke,&nbsp;Justus Welke,&nbsp;Stephen Barlow","doi":"10.1192/bji.2022.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper compares across six nations the mental health systems available to prisoners with the highest acuity of psychosis and risk combined with the lowest level of insight into the need for treatment. Variations were observed within and between nations. Findings highlight the likely impact of factors such as mental health legislation and the prison mental health workforce on a nation's ability to deliver timely and effective treatment close to home for prisoners who lack capacity to consent to treatment for their severe mental illness. The potential benefits of addressing the resulting inequalities are noted.</p>","PeriodicalId":36441,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych International","volume":"20 1","pages":"13-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909414/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bji.2022.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper compares across six nations the mental health systems available to prisoners with the highest acuity of psychosis and risk combined with the lowest level of insight into the need for treatment. Variations were observed within and between nations. Findings highlight the likely impact of factors such as mental health legislation and the prison mental health workforce on a nation's ability to deliver timely and effective treatment close to home for prisoners who lack capacity to consent to treatment for their severe mental illness. The potential benefits of addressing the resulting inequalities are noted.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
六个国家:澳大利亚、玻利维亚和四个欧洲国家的精神病囚犯系统的临床情况比较。
本文比较了六个国家的精神健康系统,这些系统适用于精神病和风险最高的囚犯,同时对治疗需求的了解程度最低。国家内部和国家之间也存在差异。调查结果突出表明,精神卫生立法和监狱精神卫生工作人员等因素可能会影响一个国家为没有能力同意接受严重精神疾病治疗的囚犯提供及时和有效在家附近治疗的能力。指出了解决由此产生的不平等的潜在好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych International
BJPsych International Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Metacommunity: the current status of psychiatry and mental healthcare and implications for the future The epistemic injustice of borderline personality disorder Underrepresentation of Indigenous mental health professionals in Bangladesh Spirituality and behavioural addictions: narrative review Gypsy, Roma and Traveller populations and mental health in the UK: a need for real working together and co-production of services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1