Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Anterior Process Locking Plate Alone versus Combined with Percutaneous Cannulated Screw Fixation for Sanders Type II Calcaneal Fractures: A Finite Element Study.

Rongji Ma, Atik Badshah Shaikh, Qinxin Zhang, Xiuyun Su, Yonghua Wang, Fuhai Pan, Jianwen Chen, Kai He
{"title":"Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Anterior Process Locking Plate Alone versus Combined with Percutaneous Cannulated Screw Fixation for Sanders Type II Calcaneal Fractures: A Finite Element Study.","authors":"Rongji Ma,&nbsp;Atik Badshah Shaikh,&nbsp;Qinxin Zhang,&nbsp;Xiuyun Su,&nbsp;Yonghua Wang,&nbsp;Fuhai Pan,&nbsp;Jianwen Chen,&nbsp;Kai He","doi":"10.12659/MSM.940300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Calcaneal fractures are the most common tarsal bone fractures, and account for 75% of intra-articular fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability of the anterior process locking plate combined with the percutaneous cannulated screw fixation (screw group) versus the anterior process locking plate fixation alone (plate group) for the treatment of Sanders type II calcaneal fractures using finite element analysis to provide a theoretical basis for clinical work. MATERIAL AND METHODS We established a 3D model of Sanders type II calcaneal fracture; assigned material properties to the internal fixation systems; applied loads; set up analysis criteria; analyzed the displacement of the fracture, relative displacement, stress state of bone tissue, and internal fixation; and compared mechanical stability. RESULTS For Sanders type II A, II B, and II C calcaneal fractures, the degree of displacement and relative displacement of the fracture in the screw group was less than that of the plate group. For all subtypes of Sanders type II calcaneal fractures, the screw group had better mechanical stability than the plate group. CONCLUSIONS Both fixation methods (screw and plate group) were within a reasonable range for restoring the levelling effect of the joint surface and maintaining the strength of fixation, and both had good mechanical stability. Finite element analysis is a relatively reliable method, and biomechanics and clinical studies must further verify the experimental results.</p>","PeriodicalId":18276,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research","volume":"29 ","pages":"e940300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/aa/83/medscimonit-29-e940300.PMC10496517.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.940300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Calcaneal fractures are the most common tarsal bone fractures, and account for 75% of intra-articular fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability of the anterior process locking plate combined with the percutaneous cannulated screw fixation (screw group) versus the anterior process locking plate fixation alone (plate group) for the treatment of Sanders type II calcaneal fractures using finite element analysis to provide a theoretical basis for clinical work. MATERIAL AND METHODS We established a 3D model of Sanders type II calcaneal fracture; assigned material properties to the internal fixation systems; applied loads; set up analysis criteria; analyzed the displacement of the fracture, relative displacement, stress state of bone tissue, and internal fixation; and compared mechanical stability. RESULTS For Sanders type II A, II B, and II C calcaneal fractures, the degree of displacement and relative displacement of the fracture in the screw group was less than that of the plate group. For all subtypes of Sanders type II calcaneal fractures, the screw group had better mechanical stability than the plate group. CONCLUSIONS Both fixation methods (screw and plate group) were within a reasonable range for restoring the levelling effect of the joint surface and maintaining the strength of fixation, and both had good mechanical stability. Finite element analysis is a relatively reliable method, and biomechanics and clinical studies must further verify the experimental results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单独前突锁定钢板与联合经皮空心螺钉固定治疗Sanders II型跟骨骨折的生物力学分析:一项有限元研究。
跟骨骨折是最常见的跗骨骨折,占关节内骨折的75%。本研究旨在通过有限元分析比较前突锁定钢板联合经皮空心螺钉固定(螺钉组)与单独前突锁定钢板固定(钢板组)治疗Sanders II型跟骨骨折的生物力学稳定性,为临床工作提供理论依据。材料与方法建立Sanders II型跟骨骨折的三维模型;为内固定系统分配材料属性;应用加载;建立分析标准;分析骨折位移、相对位移、骨组织应力状态及内固定情况;并比较了机械稳定性。结果对于Sanders II型A、II型B、II型跟骨骨折,螺钉组骨折的移位程度和相对移位程度均小于钢板组。对于Sanders II型跟骨骨折的所有亚型,螺钉组的机械稳定性优于钢板组。结论两种固定方式(螺钉组和钢板组)均在恢复关节面水平效果和保持固定强度的合理范围内,均具有良好的力学稳定性。有限元分析是一种相对可靠的方法,生物力学和临床研究必须进一步验证实验结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Foot Structure in Preschool Children Based on Body Mass. The Role of Copper-Induced M2 Macrophage Polarization in Protecting Cartilage Matrix in Osteoarthritis. Predicting Acute Cardiovascular Complications in COVID-19: Insights from a Specialized Cardiac Referral Department. Comparative Analysis of Transoral Endoscopic Parathyroidectomy Vestibular Approach and Focused Open Surgery for Primary Hyperparathyroidism Treatment: A Single Center Experience Errate: Enhanced Patient Comfort and Satisfaction with Early Oral Feeding after Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Resection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1