The victims, villains and heroes of 'panic buying': News media attribution of responsibility for COVID-19 stockpiling.

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Journal of Sociology Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1177/14407833211057310
Tarryn Phillips, Carmen Vargas, Melissa Graham, Danielle Couch, Deborah Gleeson
{"title":"The victims, villains and heroes of 'panic buying': News media attribution of responsibility for COVID-19 stockpiling.","authors":"Tarryn Phillips,&nbsp;Carmen Vargas,&nbsp;Melissa Graham,&nbsp;Danielle Couch,&nbsp;Deborah Gleeson","doi":"10.1177/14407833211057310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Societies often respond to a crisis by attributing blame to some groups while constructing others as victims and heroes. While it has received scant sociological attention, 'panic buying' is a critical indicator of such public sentiment at the onset of a crisis, and thus a crucial site for analysis. This article traces dynamics of blame in news media representations of an extreme period of panic buying during COVID-19 in Australia. Analysis reveals that lower socio-economic and ethnically diverse consumers were blamed disproportionately. Unlike wealthier consumers who bulk-bought online, shoppers filling trollies in-store were depicted as selfish and shameful, described using dehumanising language, and portrayed as 'villains' who threatened social order. Supermarkets were cast simultaneously as 'victims' of consumer aggression and 'heroes' for their moral leadership, trustworthiness and problem-solving. This portrayal misunderstands the socio-emotional drivers of panic buying, exacerbates stigma towards already disadvantaged groups, and veils the corporate profiteering that encourages stockpiling.</p>","PeriodicalId":47556,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160820/pdf/10.1177_14407833211057310.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833211057310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Societies often respond to a crisis by attributing blame to some groups while constructing others as victims and heroes. While it has received scant sociological attention, 'panic buying' is a critical indicator of such public sentiment at the onset of a crisis, and thus a crucial site for analysis. This article traces dynamics of blame in news media representations of an extreme period of panic buying during COVID-19 in Australia. Analysis reveals that lower socio-economic and ethnically diverse consumers were blamed disproportionately. Unlike wealthier consumers who bulk-bought online, shoppers filling trollies in-store were depicted as selfish and shameful, described using dehumanising language, and portrayed as 'villains' who threatened social order. Supermarkets were cast simultaneously as 'victims' of consumer aggression and 'heroes' for their moral leadership, trustworthiness and problem-solving. This portrayal misunderstands the socio-emotional drivers of panic buying, exacerbates stigma towards already disadvantaged groups, and veils the corporate profiteering that encourages stockpiling.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“恐慌性购买”的受害者、恶棍和英雄:新闻媒体对COVID-19储备的责任归属。
社会对危机的反应往往是把责任归咎于一些群体,而把另一些群体塑造成受害者和英雄。“恐慌性购买”是危机开始时公众情绪的一个重要指标,因此是一个重要的分析场所,但它很少受到社会学的关注。本文追溯了新闻媒体对澳大利亚新冠肺炎期间极端恐慌性购买时期的指责动态。分析显示,社会经济和种族多元化程度较低的消费者受到了不成比例的指责。与在网上大量购买商品的富裕消费者不同,在店内装满购物车的购物者被描绘成自私和可耻的人,使用不人道的语言,并被描绘成威胁社会秩序的“恶棍”。超市被同时塑造成消费者侵犯行为的“受害者”和道德领导、诚信和解决问题的“英雄”。这种描述误解了恐慌性购买的社会情感驱动因素,加剧了对已经处于不利地位的群体的污名,并掩盖了鼓励囤积的企业暴利行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sociology is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research in the social sciences.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class – Special COVID-19 Edition by Guy Standing Do-it-yourself lifestyle movements in grassroots activist communities: A case study of Brisbane, Australia Book Review: Social Networks and Migration: Relocations, Relationships and Resources by Louise Ryan ‘This is NOT human services’: Counter-mapping automated decision-making in social services in Australia Book Review: Digital Migration by Koen Leurs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1