Observations by Caregivers Using the Infant with Clefts Observation Outcomes Instrument (iCOO): A Comparison of Three Versus Seven-day Daily Diaries.

IF 1.2 4区医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1177/10556656231175290

Muhammad Rahman, Brian G Leroux, Christy M McKinney, Kathleen A Kapp-Simon, Todd Edwards, Salene M Jones, Janine M Rosenberg, Donald Patrick, Kristen Daniels, Laura Stueckle, Carrie L Heike

{"title":"Observations by Caregivers Using the Infant with Clefts Observation Outcomes Instrument (iCOO): A Comparison of Three Versus Seven-day Daily Diaries.","authors":"Muhammad Rahman, Brian G Leroux, Christy M McKinney, Kathleen A Kapp-Simon, Todd Edwards, Salene M Jones, Janine M Rosenberg, Donald Patrick, Kristen Daniels, Laura Stueckle, Carrie L Heike","doi":"10.1177/10556656231175290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Our goal was to compare data collected from 3- and 7-day Infant with Clefts Observation Outcomes (iCOO) diaries.Design: Secondary data analysis of an observational longitudinal cohort study. Caregivers completed the daily iCOO for 7 days before cleft lip surgery (T0) and for 7 days after cleft lip repair (T1). We compared 3- and 7-day diaries collected at T0 and 3- and 7-day diaries collected at T1.Setting: United States.Participants: Primary caregivers of infants with cleft lip with and without cleft palate (N = 131) planning lip repair and enrolled in original iCOO study.Main outcomes measure(s): Mean differences and Pearson correlation coefficients.Results: Correlation coefficients were high for global impressions (>0.90) and scaled scores (0.80-0.98). Mean differences were small across iCOO domains at T0. T1 comparisons reflected the same pattern.Conclusions: Three-day diary data is comparable to 7-day diaries for measuring caregiver observations using iCOO across T0 and T1.","PeriodicalId":55255,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10704860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231175290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Our goal was to compare data collected from 3- and 7-day Infant with Clefts Observation Outcomes (iCOO) diaries.

Design: Secondary data analysis of an observational longitudinal cohort study. Caregivers completed the daily iCOO for 7 days before cleft lip surgery (T0) and for 7 days after cleft lip repair (T1). We compared 3- and 7-day diaries collected at T0 and 3- and 7-day diaries collected at T1.

Setting: United States.

Participants: Primary caregivers of infants with cleft lip with and without cleft palate (N = 131) planning lip repair and enrolled in original iCOO study.

Main outcomes measure(s): Mean differences and Pearson correlation coefficients.

Results: Correlation coefficients were high for global impressions (>0.90) and scaled scores (0.80-0.98). Mean differences were small across iCOO domains at T0. T1 comparisons reflected the same pattern.

Conclusions: Three-day diary data is comparable to 7-day diaries for measuring caregiver observations using iCOO across T0 and T1.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

护理人员使用裂隙婴儿观察结果工具 (iCOO) 进行的观察：三日日记与七日日记的比较。

目的：我们的目标是比较 3 天和 7 天裂隙婴儿观察结果（iCOO）日记中收集的数据：我们的目标是比较从裂隙婴儿观察结果（iCOO）3 天和 7 天日记中收集到的数据：设计：一项观察性纵向队列研究的二次数据分析。护理人员填写了唇裂手术前 7 天（T0）和唇裂修复后 7 天（T1）的每日 iCOO 日志。我们比较了在 T0 收集的 3 天和 7 天日记与在 T1 收集的 3 天和 7 天日记：地点：美国：唇裂伴腭裂和不伴腭裂婴儿（N = 131）的主要看护人，他们计划进行唇部修复并参加了最初的 iCOO 研究：主要结果测量指标：平均差和皮尔逊相关系数：结果：总体印象（大于 0.90）和比例评分（0.80-0.98）的相关系数较高。在 T0 阶段，各 iCOO 领域的平均差异较小。T1比较反映了相同的模式：结论：在使用 iCOO 测量护理人员在 T0 和 T1 期间的观察结果时，三天日记数据与七天日记数据具有可比性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 医学-外科

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

36.40%

发文量

215

期刊介绍： The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.