Infection prevention and control strategies against carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae - a systematic review.

IF 1 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Infection Prevention Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1177/17571774211066762
Catarina Santos-Marques, Helena Ferreira, Sónia Gonçalves Pereira
{"title":"Infection prevention and control strategies against carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae - a systematic review.","authors":"Catarina Santos-Marques,&nbsp;Helena Ferreira,&nbsp;Sónia Gonçalves Pereira","doi":"10.1177/17571774211066762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance is exponentially worsening, and the spread of prevalent carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) is a major contributor to this global concern. Infection prevention and control strategies are increasingly consolidated key tools to control this worldwide problem.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify, collect and analyse available evidence regarding the impact of infection prevention and control strategies on prevalent CRE dissemination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pubmed®, Scopus® and Web of Science® were searched systematically for articles published between 1th January 2017 and 30th June 2020, guided by the research question 'What are the most effective and efficient strategies to prevent and control infection/colonisation caused by Carbapenem resistant <i>Escherichia coli</i> and Carbapenem resistant <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>?'.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Eleven thousand six hundred and thirty-five publications were found, but after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, only 30 were selected. The majority of reviewed studies (<i>n</i> = 24) were performed in outbreak situations, 26 studies occurred in acute care units and of those, 17 in intensive care units . From the set of implemented infection prevention and control measures, in 29 studies surveillance cultures were applied, in 23 studies patients were isolated or cohorted and, in general, all described the implementation of standard and contact precaution measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review underlines the importance of infection prevention and control strategies in CRE dissemination, standing out the need of further studies outside outbreak and intensive care units contexts. Investment increments and training and educating of all involved are also important contributors to shift this problem, but still with relevant gaps in their implementation, in all types of care units, that need to be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":"23 4","pages":"167-185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226056/pdf/10.1177_17571774211066762.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774211066762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is exponentially worsening, and the spread of prevalent carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) is a major contributor to this global concern. Infection prevention and control strategies are increasingly consolidated key tools to control this worldwide problem.

Aim: To identify, collect and analyse available evidence regarding the impact of infection prevention and control strategies on prevalent CRE dissemination.

Methods: Pubmed®, Scopus® and Web of Science® were searched systematically for articles published between 1th January 2017 and 30th June 2020, guided by the research question 'What are the most effective and efficient strategies to prevent and control infection/colonisation caused by Carbapenem resistant Escherichia coli and Carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae?'.

Findings: Eleven thousand six hundred and thirty-five publications were found, but after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, only 30 were selected. The majority of reviewed studies (n = 24) were performed in outbreak situations, 26 studies occurred in acute care units and of those, 17 in intensive care units . From the set of implemented infection prevention and control measures, in 29 studies surveillance cultures were applied, in 23 studies patients were isolated or cohorted and, in general, all described the implementation of standard and contact precaution measures.

Conclusion: This systematic review underlines the importance of infection prevention and control strategies in CRE dissemination, standing out the need of further studies outside outbreak and intensive care units contexts. Investment increments and training and educating of all involved are also important contributors to shift this problem, but still with relevant gaps in their implementation, in all types of care units, that need to be addressed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌科感染防控策略综述
背景:抗菌素耐药性呈指数级恶化,普遍的碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌科(CRE)的传播是这一全球关注的主要因素。感染预防和控制战略日益成为控制这一世界性问题的关键工具。目的:确定、收集和分析有关感染预防和控制策略对CRE流行传播影响的现有证据。方法:以“耐碳青霉烯类大肠杆菌和耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌引起的感染/定植最有效的策略是什么?”为研究问题,系统检索Pubmed®、Scopus®和Web of Science®2017年1月1日至2020年6月30日期间发表的文章。结果:共发现11635篇文献,但应用纳入和排除标准后,仅入选30篇。大多数审查的研究(n = 24)是在暴发情况下进行的,26项研究发生在急性护理病房,其中17项发生在重症监护病房。在实施的感染预防和控制措施中,29项研究采用了监测培养,23项研究对患者进行了隔离或分组,总体上都描述了标准和接触预防措施的实施情况。结论:本系统综述强调了感染预防和控制策略在CRE传播中的重要性,强调了在疫情暴发和重症监护病房以外进行进一步研究的必要性。增加投资以及对所有相关人员进行培训和教育也是改变这一问题的重要因素,但在所有类型的护理单位的实施方面仍存在相关差距,需要加以解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infection Prevention
Journal of Infection Prevention Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Infection Prevention is the professional publication of the Infection Prevention Society. The aim of the journal is to advance the evidence base in infection prevention and control, and to provide a publishing platform for all health professionals interested in this field of practice. Journal of Infection Prevention is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication containing a wide range of articles: ·Original primary research studies ·Qualitative and quantitative studies ·Reviews of the evidence on various topics ·Practice development project reports ·Guidelines for practice ·Case studies ·Overviews of infectious diseases and their causative organisms ·Audit and surveillance studies/projects
期刊最新文献
Impact of antimicrobial stewardship on healthcare-associated infections and antibiotic prescriptions in African countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Preparedness for infection prevention and control practice among undergraduate students: A systematic review. Observational study of 2-year data on the impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Committee's focused department-level audit and feedback intervention on adherence to surgical prophylaxis guidelines at a secondary care hospital in the United Arab Emirates. Diary. Determinants of face mask-wearing behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic among Southeast Asian countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1