Decídetexto México: Recruitment and baseline characteristics of Mexican individuals who smoke in a cessation study.

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Tobacco Use Insights Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179173X231157378
Rosibel Rodríguez-Bolaños, Paula Ramírez-Palacios, Alejandra Bolaños, Daimarelys Lara, Gabriel Millan, Katia Gallegos-Carrillo, Yvonne N Flores, Raúl M Mejia, Ana Paula Cupertino, Francisco Cartujano-Barrera
{"title":"Decídetexto México: Recruitment and baseline characteristics of Mexican individuals who smoke in a cessation study.","authors":"Rosibel Rodríguez-Bolaños,&nbsp;Paula Ramírez-Palacios,&nbsp;Alejandra Bolaños,&nbsp;Daimarelys Lara,&nbsp;Gabriel Millan,&nbsp;Katia Gallegos-Carrillo,&nbsp;Yvonne N Flores,&nbsp;Raúl M Mejia,&nbsp;Ana Paula Cupertino,&nbsp;Francisco Cartujano-Barrera","doi":"10.1177/1179173X231157378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of digital and traditional methods and strategies in the recruitment of Mexican individuals who smoke into a cessation study. Recruitment method refers in general to either digital or traditional recruitment. Recruitment strategies refer to the particular recruitment type utilized within each recruitment method. Traditional recruitment strategies included radio interviews, word of mouth, newspaper advertisement, posters/banners placed in primary healthcare clinics, and medical referrals. Digital recruitment strategies involved emails and study advertisements through social media (i.e., Facebook, Instagram and Twitter) and website. In a 4-month period, 100 Mexican individuals who smoke were successfully enrolled into a smoking cessation study. The majority of participants were enrolled via traditional recruitment strategies (86%) compared to the digital recruitment strategies (14%). Individuals screened in the digital method were more likely to be eligible to participate in the study, compared to the traditional method. Similarly, in comparison to the traditional method, individuals in the digital method were more likely to enroll in the study. However, these differences were not statistically significant. Both traditional and digital strategies made important contributions to the overall recruitment effort.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"16 ","pages":"1179173X231157378"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/17/ba/10.1177_1179173X231157378.PMC10326465.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Use Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X231157378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of digital and traditional methods and strategies in the recruitment of Mexican individuals who smoke into a cessation study. Recruitment method refers in general to either digital or traditional recruitment. Recruitment strategies refer to the particular recruitment type utilized within each recruitment method. Traditional recruitment strategies included radio interviews, word of mouth, newspaper advertisement, posters/banners placed in primary healthcare clinics, and medical referrals. Digital recruitment strategies involved emails and study advertisements through social media (i.e., Facebook, Instagram and Twitter) and website. In a 4-month period, 100 Mexican individuals who smoke were successfully enrolled into a smoking cessation study. The majority of participants were enrolled via traditional recruitment strategies (86%) compared to the digital recruitment strategies (14%). Individuals screened in the digital method were more likely to be eligible to participate in the study, compared to the traditional method. Similarly, in comparison to the traditional method, individuals in the digital method were more likely to enroll in the study. However, these differences were not statistically significant. Both traditional and digital strategies made important contributions to the overall recruitment effort.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decídetexto m录影带:墨西哥人在戒烟研究中的招募和基线特征。
本研究的目的是评估数字和传统方法和策略在招募墨西哥吸烟者参加戒烟研究中的有效性。招聘方式一般指数字化招聘和传统招聘。招聘策略是指在每种招聘方法中使用的特定招聘类型。传统的招聘策略包括电台采访、口头宣传、报纸广告、在初级保健诊所张贴海报/横幅以及转诊。数字招聘策略包括电子邮件和通过社交媒体(即Facebook, Instagram和Twitter)和网站发布的学习广告。在4个月的时间里,100名吸烟的墨西哥人成功地参加了一项戒烟研究。与数字招聘策略(14%)相比,大多数参与者是通过传统招聘策略(86%)招募的。与传统方法相比,通过数字方法筛选的个人更有可能有资格参与研究。同样,与传统方法相比,数字方法中的个人更有可能参加研究。然而,这些差异没有统计学意义。传统策略和数字策略都对整个招聘工作做出了重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tobacco Use Insights
Tobacco Use Insights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the Digital Landscape of E-Cigarette Marketing in India: Evidence From Mixed Method Study. An Observational Study of Regulatory Violations Related to Online Tobacco Product Marketing and Retailer Responses to US FDA Warning Letters. Social Acceptability and Health Concerns of Smoking and Vaping Among University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. How Community Health Workers can Address Tobacco Dependence of High-Risk patients: A Qualitative Analysis of the Unique Training Needs of Community Health Workers. Predictors of Successful Tobacco Cessation After Receiving an E-Cigarette Based Smoking Cessation Intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1