Effect of shift-based scheduling on student learning, satisfaction and capacity in obstetrics and gynecology rotations.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES International Journal of Medical Education Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI:10.5116/ijme.64b4.f880
Erin Nelson
{"title":"Effect of shift-based scheduling on student learning, satisfaction and capacity in obstetrics and gynecology rotations.","authors":"Erin Nelson","doi":"10.5116/ijme.64b4.f880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determine how a shift- based schedule to accommodate more students affects learning, performance, and satisfaction with the Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBG) rotation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted among third year OBG medical students with a triangular convergent cross-sectional approach. A new shift-based schedule was implemented. After each rotation, an online survey was conducted using a convenience sampling. Student scores on the National Board of Medical Examiner (NBME) OBG subject exam were analyzed using paired t test. Survey data was analyzed using two sample t test. The relationship between survey responses and exam score findings were described. Data from shift-schedule students was compared to traditional schedule students from the prior academic year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant improvement was seen for average NBME score for shift-schedule students during the beginning portion (groups 1-3) of the academic year (M=80, SD=6.9) compared to traditional (M=75.7, SD=7.3) [t <sub>(145)</sub> =3.69, p =.001]. A similar pattern was not seen in subsequent groups (groups 4-6). Shift-schedule students also showed a statistically significant improvement in their perception of learning (t <sub>(183)</sub> =-2.54, p =.012). Parallel results were seen for belonging, manageable workload, time to study, and engaging meaningfully. Using this model, we increased rotation capacity from 24 to 30 students per group (20%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shift based scheduling allows 20% increase in capacity. Exam scores and student learning outcomes were similar or better than traditional schedule controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":"14 ","pages":"100-105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693958/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.64b4.f880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Determine how a shift- based schedule to accommodate more students affects learning, performance, and satisfaction with the Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBG) rotation.

Methods: The study was conducted among third year OBG medical students with a triangular convergent cross-sectional approach. A new shift-based schedule was implemented. After each rotation, an online survey was conducted using a convenience sampling. Student scores on the National Board of Medical Examiner (NBME) OBG subject exam were analyzed using paired t test. Survey data was analyzed using two sample t test. The relationship between survey responses and exam score findings were described. Data from shift-schedule students was compared to traditional schedule students from the prior academic year.

Results: A statistically significant improvement was seen for average NBME score for shift-schedule students during the beginning portion (groups 1-3) of the academic year (M=80, SD=6.9) compared to traditional (M=75.7, SD=7.3) [t (145) =3.69, p =.001]. A similar pattern was not seen in subsequent groups (groups 4-6). Shift-schedule students also showed a statistically significant improvement in their perception of learning (t (183) =-2.54, p =.012). Parallel results were seen for belonging, manageable workload, time to study, and engaging meaningfully. Using this model, we increased rotation capacity from 24 to 30 students per group (20%).

Conclusions: Shift based scheduling allows 20% increase in capacity. Exam scores and student learning outcomes were similar or better than traditional schedule controls.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轮班制对妇产科轮转学生学习、满意度和能力的影响。
目的:确定以轮班为基础的时间表如何适应更多的学生影响妇产科(OBG)轮转的学习、表现和满意度。方法:采用三角收敛横断面入路对OBG三年级医学生进行研究。实行了新的轮班制。每次轮换后,使用方便的抽样方式进行在线调查。采用配对t检验对全国医学检验委员会(NBME) OBG科目考试学生成绩进行分析。调查数据采用两样本t检验进行分析。描述了调查结果与考试成绩之间的关系。将倒班制学生的数据与上一学年的传统制学生的数据进行比较。结果:倒班制学生在学年开始部分(1-3组)的平均NBME分数(M=80, SD=6.9)与传统学生(M=75.7, SD=7.3)相比有统计学意义上的显著改善[t (145) =3.69, p =.001]。在随后的各组(4-6组)中没有发现类似的模式。倒班制学生的学习知觉也有统计学上的显著改善(t (183) =-2.54, p = 0.012)。在归属感、可管理的工作量、学习时间和有意义的参与方面也有类似的结果。使用这个模型,我们将每组24名学生的轮换能力提高到30名(20%)。结论:基于班次的调度允许20%的容量增加。考试成绩和学生的学习成果与传统的时间表控制相似或更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Education
International Journal of Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Evaluating an e-learning course's impact and challenges on genomic literacy among medical professionals. How do mentors perceive and perform their role in a reflection-based mentoring programme for medical students? Enhancing the learning experience by empowering medical students to co-create learning tools and classroom activities. Profiles of intercultural sensitivity of healthcare students: a person-centred approach. Effectively supporting widening participation learners in medical education through a capability approach lens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1