Do health service waiting areas contribute to the health literacy of consumers? A scoping review.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Promotion International Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1093/heapro/daad046
Cassie E McDonald, Catherine Voutier, Dhruv Govil, Aruska N D'Souza, Dominic Truong, Shaza Abo, Louisa J Remedios, Catherine L Granger
{"title":"Do health service waiting areas contribute to the health literacy of consumers? A scoping review.","authors":"Cassie E McDonald, Catherine Voutier, Dhruv Govil, Aruska N D'Souza, Dominic Truong, Shaza Abo, Louisa J Remedios, Catherine L Granger","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daad046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health service waiting areas commonly provide health information, resources and supports for consumers; however, the effect on health literacy and related outcomes remains unclear. This scoping review of the literature aimed to explore the use of waiting areas as a place to contribute to the health literacy and related outcomes of consumers attending health appointments. Articles were included if they focussed on health literacy or health literacy responsiveness (concept) in outpatient or primary care health service waiting areas (context) for adult consumers (population) and were published after 2010. Ten bibliographic databases, one full-text archive, dissertation repositories and web sources were searched. The search yielded 5095 records. After duplicate removal, 3942 title/abstract records were screened and 360 full-text records assessed. Data were charted into a standardized data extraction tool. A total of 116 unique articles (published empirical and grey literature) were included. Most articles were set in primary and community care (49%) waiting areas. A diverse range of health topics and resource types were available, but results demonstrated they were not always used by consumers. Outcomes measured in intervention studies were health knowledge, intentions and other psychological factors, self-reported and observed behaviours, clinical outcomes and health service utilization. Intervention studies overall demonstrated positive trends in health literacy-related outcomes, although the benefit declined after 3-6 months. Research on using waiting areas for health literacy purposes is increasing globally. Future research investigating the needs of consumers to inform optimal intervention design is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a4/e4/daad046.PMC10340083.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daad046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health service waiting areas commonly provide health information, resources and supports for consumers; however, the effect on health literacy and related outcomes remains unclear. This scoping review of the literature aimed to explore the use of waiting areas as a place to contribute to the health literacy and related outcomes of consumers attending health appointments. Articles were included if they focussed on health literacy or health literacy responsiveness (concept) in outpatient or primary care health service waiting areas (context) for adult consumers (population) and were published after 2010. Ten bibliographic databases, one full-text archive, dissertation repositories and web sources were searched. The search yielded 5095 records. After duplicate removal, 3942 title/abstract records were screened and 360 full-text records assessed. Data were charted into a standardized data extraction tool. A total of 116 unique articles (published empirical and grey literature) were included. Most articles were set in primary and community care (49%) waiting areas. A diverse range of health topics and resource types were available, but results demonstrated they were not always used by consumers. Outcomes measured in intervention studies were health knowledge, intentions and other psychological factors, self-reported and observed behaviours, clinical outcomes and health service utilization. Intervention studies overall demonstrated positive trends in health literacy-related outcomes, although the benefit declined after 3-6 months. Research on using waiting areas for health literacy purposes is increasing globally. Future research investigating the needs of consumers to inform optimal intervention design is needed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康服务等候区是否有助于提高消费者的健康素养?范围审查。
健康服务候诊区通常为消费者提供健康信息、资源和支持;然而,对卫生知识普及和相关结果的影响仍不清楚。本文献的范围审查旨在探讨使用等候区作为一个地方,以促进健康素养和相关结果的消费者参加健康预约。如果文章的重点是针对成年消费者(人口)的门诊或初级保健卫生服务候诊区(背景)的健康素养或健康素养反应(概念),并在2010年之后发表,则纳入其中。检索了10个书目数据库、1个全文数据库、论文库和网络资源。搜索产生了5095条记录。删除重复后,筛选了3942条标题/摘要记录,评估了360条全文记录。数据被绘制成一个标准化的数据提取工具。共纳入116篇独特的文章(已发表的实证文献和灰色文献)。大多数条目设置在初级和社区护理候诊区(49%)。有各种各样的健康主题和资源类型可供使用,但结果表明,它们并不总是被消费者使用。干预研究测量的结果是健康知识、意图和其他心理因素、自我报告和观察到的行为、临床结果和卫生服务利用情况。干预研究总体上显示了健康素养相关结果的积极趋势,尽管益处在3-6个月后有所下降。在全球范围内,关于利用等候区进行卫生扫盲的研究正在增加。未来的研究需要调查消费者的需求,以告知最佳的干预设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
期刊最新文献
Testing the effects of nutrition-related claims on perceptions of and preferences for alcohol products among Australian consumers. Why school tobacco bans fail: staff engagement in enforcement in Belgian schools. Parental food provisioning behaviours and perceptions in relation to environmentally sustainable diets for young children. Calling for a more coherent policy response to driving harm. An umbrella review of barriers, facilitators, and interventions for children and youth with disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1