Resident Engagement With a Web- and App-based Journal Club Curriculum Utilizing Email and Text Notifications.

Daniel P Walsh, Vanessa T Wong, John D Mitchell
{"title":"Resident Engagement With a Web- and App-based Journal Club Curriculum Utilizing Email and Text Notifications.","authors":"Daniel P Walsh,&nbsp;Vanessa T Wong,&nbsp;John D Mitchell","doi":"10.46374/volxxv_issue3_Walsh","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High learner engagement is important for the success of asynchronous and online learning for graduate medical education. Medical trainees have recently reported using medical mobile apps. App-based interactions may provide more participation than email-based interactions. We sought to investigate (1) if there were higher levels of engagement with an online curriculum using notifications sent via email as compared with via text, and (2) if there were higher levels of engagement with the mobile app or website format.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented an online Journal Club curriculum with weekly topics for anesthesiology residents (postgraduate years 2-4) from July 2020 to June 2021. Weekly notifications were sent to residents via email for weeks 1-10, text for weeks 11-20, then email for weeks 21-49. Based on activity logs, we compared (1) the weekly numbers of interactions when email notifications were sent with the weekly numbers of interactions when text notifications were sent, and (2) the weekly numbers of interactions via the app with the weekly numbers of interactions via the website.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight of the 54 anesthesiology residents in our department at the time of the study (70.4%) interacted with the online Journal Club at least once throughout the study. The weekly numbers of interactions with email notifications (median [interquartile range (IQR)]: 13 [7-28]) were significantly higher than with text notifications (median [IQR]: 6 [4-8]) (<i>P</i> = .023). The weekly numbers of interactions via the website (median [IQR]: 9 [4-24]) were significantly higher than via the app (median [IQR]: 0 [0-1]) (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although mobile technology may increase engagement and participation for some educational resources, learners may prefer accessing others through more conventional methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"25 3","pages":"E713"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502580/pdf/i2333-0406-25-3-Walsh.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxv_issue3_Walsh","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High learner engagement is important for the success of asynchronous and online learning for graduate medical education. Medical trainees have recently reported using medical mobile apps. App-based interactions may provide more participation than email-based interactions. We sought to investigate (1) if there were higher levels of engagement with an online curriculum using notifications sent via email as compared with via text, and (2) if there were higher levels of engagement with the mobile app or website format.

Methods: We implemented an online Journal Club curriculum with weekly topics for anesthesiology residents (postgraduate years 2-4) from July 2020 to June 2021. Weekly notifications were sent to residents via email for weeks 1-10, text for weeks 11-20, then email for weeks 21-49. Based on activity logs, we compared (1) the weekly numbers of interactions when email notifications were sent with the weekly numbers of interactions when text notifications were sent, and (2) the weekly numbers of interactions via the app with the weekly numbers of interactions via the website.

Results: Thirty-eight of the 54 anesthesiology residents in our department at the time of the study (70.4%) interacted with the online Journal Club at least once throughout the study. The weekly numbers of interactions with email notifications (median [interquartile range (IQR)]: 13 [7-28]) were significantly higher than with text notifications (median [IQR]: 6 [4-8]) (P = .023). The weekly numbers of interactions via the website (median [IQR]: 9 [4-24]) were significantly higher than via the app (median [IQR]: 0 [0-1]) (P < .001).

Conclusions: Although mobile technology may increase engagement and participation for some educational resources, learners may prefer accessing others through more conventional methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
居民参与基于网络和应用程序的期刊俱乐部课程,利用电子邮件和文本通知。
背景:高学习者参与度对研究生医学教育异步和在线学习的成功至关重要。医疗实习生最近报告说使用医疗移动应用程序。基于应用程序的交互可能比基于电子邮件的交互提供更多的参与。我们试图调查(1)与通过文本发送通知相比,通过电子邮件发送通知是否对在线课程有更高的参与度,以及(2)是否对移动应用程序或网站格式有更高的参与度。方法:从2020年7月至2021年6月,我们为麻醉学住院医师(研究生2-4年级)实施了每周主题的在线期刊俱乐部课程。在第1-10周,每周通过电子邮件向居民发送通知,在第11-20周通过文本通知,然后在第21-49周通过电子邮件通知。根据活动日志,我们比较了(1)发送电子邮件通知时的每周互动次数与发送文本通知时的每周互动次数,(2)通过应用程序进行的每周互动次数与通过网站进行的每周互动次数。结果:在研究期间,我科54名麻醉科住院医师中有38人(70.4%)在整个研究过程中至少与在线期刊俱乐部进行过一次互动。每周与电子邮件通知的互动次数(中位数[四分位数间距(IQR)]: 13[7-28])显著高于与文本通知的互动次数(中位数[IQR]: 6 [4-8]) (P = 0.023)。通过网站的每周互动次数(中位数[IQR]: 9[4-24])显著高于通过应用程序(中位数[IQR]: 0 [0-1]) (P < .001)。结论:尽管移动技术可以提高某些教育资源的参与度,但学习者可能更喜欢通过更传统的方法访问其他资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geographical Distribution of Newly Accredited Anesthesiology Training Programs in Relation to Health Professional Shortage Areas and Medically Underserved Populations. Identification of Candidate Characteristics that Predicted a Successful Anesthesiology Residency Program Match in 2024: An Anonymous, Prospective Survey. The Role of Ombuds in Graduate Medical Education: Fostering Wellness and Psychological Safety. Assessment and Recommendations for the Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Fellowship Websites. Development of a Prioritized Anesthesiology Residency Critical Care Content Outline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1