Benefits of the Polypill on Medication Adherence in the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.6 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vascular Health and Risk Management Pub Date : 2023-09-12 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/VHRM.S421024
Jose P Lopez-Lopez, Ana Maria Gonzalez, Paola Lanza, Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo
{"title":"Benefits of the Polypill on Medication Adherence in the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Jose P Lopez-Lopez,&nbsp;Ana Maria Gonzalez,&nbsp;Paola Lanza,&nbsp;Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo","doi":"10.2147/VHRM.S421024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Higher medication adherence reduces the risk of new cardiovascular events. However, there are individual and health system barriers that lead to lower adherence. The polypill has demonstrated benefits in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality mainly driven by an increase in adherence. We aim to evaluate the impact of the polypill on adherence to cardiovascular medication, its efficacy and safety in cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Databases were searched from January 2003 to December 2022. We included randomized, pragmatic, or real-world clinical trials and observational studies. The primary outcome was medication adherence, secondary outcomes were efficacy in cardiovascular disease in primary and secondary prevention and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the 490 publications screened, 13 met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into a comparative table Of those included, 70% were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 53.8% focused on secondary prevention. Most of the studies received a high and moderate quality rating. Self-report, pill counting and, the Morisky scale were the most frequent methods to evaluate adherence (84.6%). Compared with standard medication, the polypill improved overall medication adherence by 13%, with percentages ranging from 7.6% to 34.9%. Moreover, a potential benefit was also observed in reducing Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), particularly in secondary prevention studies, with hazard ratios ranged between 0.43 to 0.76. Compared to standard care, the profile of side effects was similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The polypill is an effective, safe, and practical strategy to improve adherence in people at risk of CVD. Although there is a demonstrated benefit in reducing MACE, predominantly in secondary prevention, there are still gaps in its efficacy in primary prevention and reducing total mortality. Therefore, the importance of obtaining long-term results of the polypill effect and how this strategy can be implemented in real practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23597,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Health and Risk Management","volume":"19 ","pages":"605-615"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/82/23/vhrm-19-605.PMC10504901.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Health and Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S421024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Higher medication adherence reduces the risk of new cardiovascular events. However, there are individual and health system barriers that lead to lower adherence. The polypill has demonstrated benefits in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality mainly driven by an increase in adherence. We aim to evaluate the impact of the polypill on adherence to cardiovascular medication, its efficacy and safety in cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention.

Methods: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Databases were searched from January 2003 to December 2022. We included randomized, pragmatic, or real-world clinical trials and observational studies. The primary outcome was medication adherence, secondary outcomes were efficacy in cardiovascular disease in primary and secondary prevention and safety.

Results: From the 490 publications screened, 13 met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into a comparative table Of those included, 70% were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 53.8% focused on secondary prevention. Most of the studies received a high and moderate quality rating. Self-report, pill counting and, the Morisky scale were the most frequent methods to evaluate adherence (84.6%). Compared with standard medication, the polypill improved overall medication adherence by 13%, with percentages ranging from 7.6% to 34.9%. Moreover, a potential benefit was also observed in reducing Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), particularly in secondary prevention studies, with hazard ratios ranged between 0.43 to 0.76. Compared to standard care, the profile of side effects was similar.

Conclusion: The polypill is an effective, safe, and practical strategy to improve adherence in people at risk of CVD. Although there is a demonstrated benefit in reducing MACE, predominantly in secondary prevention, there are still gaps in its efficacy in primary prevention and reducing total mortality. Therefore, the importance of obtaining long-term results of the polypill effect and how this strategy can be implemented in real practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
息肉对心血管疾病一级和二级预防中药物依从性的益处:系统综述。
背景:更高的药物依从性降低了新的心血管事件的风险。然而,个人和卫生系统的障碍导致依从性降低。息肉病已证明对心血管发病率和死亡率有好处,主要是由于依从性的增加。我们的目的是评估息肉对心血管药物依从性的影响,其在心血管疾病(CVD)预防中的疗效和安全性。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统回顾。数据库检索时间为2003年1月至2022年12月。我们纳入了随机、实用或真实世界的临床试验和观察性研究。主要结果是药物依从性,次要结果是心血管疾病一级和二级预防的有效性和安全性。结果:在筛选的490份出版物中,有13份符合纳入标准并纳入对照表。在纳入的出版物中,70%是随机对照试验(RCT),53.8%侧重于二级预防。大多数研究都获得了高质量和中等质量的评价。自我报告、药丸计数和Morisky量表是评估依从性的最常见方法(84.6%)。与标准药物相比,多药丸使总体药物依从性提高了13%,百分比从7.6%到34.9%不等。此外,在减少重大心血管不良事件(MACE)方面也观察到了潜在的益处,特别是在二级预防研究中,危险比在0.43至0.76之间。与标准护理相比,副作用情况相似。结论:息肉病是一种有效、安全、实用的策略,可改善心血管疾病高危人群的依从性。尽管减少MACE(主要是二级预防)有明显的益处,但其在一级预防和降低总死亡率方面的疗效仍存在差距。因此,获得多比尔效应的长期结果的重要性,以及如何在实际实践中实施这一策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular Health and Risk Management
Vascular Health and Risk Management PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies on the processes involved in the maintenance of vascular health; the monitoring, prevention, and treatment of vascular disease and its sequelae; and the involvement of metabolic disorders, particularly diabetes. In addition, the journal will also seek to define drug usage in terms of ultimate uptake and acceptance by the patient and healthcare professional.
期刊最新文献
Characteristic of 24-Hour Blood Pressure Dipping Patterns in Hypertensive Stroke Patients. Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Is This Light at the End of the Tunnel? Misdiagnosis of Chronic Heart Failure in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care: A Report of Two Cases and Literature Review. Clinical Accuracy of the G.LAB MD41A0 Upper Arm Blood Pressure Monitor in Pregnancy and Pre-Eclampsia Using the AAMI/ESH/ISO as Reference Standard. Fatal Acute Limb Ischemia Due to Catastrophic Late Endograft Infection and Adjacent Arterial Infection After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair - A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1