The effect of oral anticoagulant use before visit for patients with COVID-19 on mortality: A meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Tzu Chi Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_199_22
Cornelia Ghea, Ardyan Wardhana, Alfredo Nugroho, Fika Humaeda Assilmi
{"title":"The effect of oral anticoagulant use before visit for patients with COVID-19 on mortality: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Cornelia Ghea,&nbsp;Ardyan Wardhana,&nbsp;Alfredo Nugroho,&nbsp;Fika Humaeda Assilmi","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_199_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Anticoagulants have been used as therapeutic or prophylactic agents in COVID-19 and seem to be more beneficial. However, the advantage of oral anticoagulant (OAC) consumption before visit in lowering mortality in COVID-19 patients remains debatable. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of OAC use before visit on mortality using the hazard ratio (HR) to estimate the effect of time-to-event endpoints.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a literature search in the PubMed and ProQuest databases for any studies comparing groups consuming OAC to no-OAC before visit for mortality in patients with COVID-19. We calculated the overall HRs and their variances across the studies using the random-effects model to obtain pooled estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 12 studies which had sample sizes ranging from 70 to 459,402 patients. A meta-analysis comparing OAC therapy and non-OAC consumption in COVID-19 patients before visit revealed no decrease in all-cause mortality (HR = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-1.02, <i>P</i> = 0.12; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 68%). However, subgroup analysis of laboratory-confirmed populations revealed that OAC use before visit had a beneficial effect on mortality (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.98, <i>P</i> = 0.02; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 56%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of OAC before visit had no beneficial effect on all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":45873,"journal":{"name":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/67/81/TCMJ-35-226.PMC10399847.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_199_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Anticoagulants have been used as therapeutic or prophylactic agents in COVID-19 and seem to be more beneficial. However, the advantage of oral anticoagulant (OAC) consumption before visit in lowering mortality in COVID-19 patients remains debatable. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of OAC use before visit on mortality using the hazard ratio (HR) to estimate the effect of time-to-event endpoints.

Materials and methods: We conducted a literature search in the PubMed and ProQuest databases for any studies comparing groups consuming OAC to no-OAC before visit for mortality in patients with COVID-19. We calculated the overall HRs and their variances across the studies using the random-effects model to obtain pooled estimates.

Results: We included 12 studies which had sample sizes ranging from 70 to 459,402 patients. A meta-analysis comparing OAC therapy and non-OAC consumption in COVID-19 patients before visit revealed no decrease in all-cause mortality (HR = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-1.02, P = 0.12; I2 = 68%). However, subgroup analysis of laboratory-confirmed populations revealed that OAC use before visit had a beneficial effect on mortality (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.98, P = 0.02; I2 = 56%).

Conclusion: The use of OAC before visit had no beneficial effect on all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19患者就诊前口服抗凝剂对死亡率的影响:一项荟萃分析
目的:抗凝血剂已被用作COVID-19的治疗或预防药物,似乎更有益。然而,就诊前口服抗凝剂(OAC)在降低COVID-19患者死亡率方面的优势仍存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在评估就诊前使用OAC对死亡率的影响,使用风险比(HR)来估计时间到事件终点的影响。材料和方法:我们在PubMed和ProQuest数据库中进行了文献检索,以比较就诊前服用OAC组和未服用OAC组对COVID-19患者死亡率的影响。我们使用随机效应模型计算了所有研究的总体hr及其方差,以获得汇总估计。结果:我们纳入了12项研究,样本量从70到459,402例患者。一项比较就诊前COVID-19患者OAC治疗和非OAC治疗的荟萃分析显示,全因死亡率没有下降(HR = 0.92, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.83-1.02, P = 0.12;I2 = 68%)。然而,对实验室确认人群的亚组分析显示,就诊前使用OAC对死亡率有有益影响(HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.98, P = 0.02;I2 = 56%)。结论:就诊前使用OAC对COVID-19患者全因死亡率无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Tzu Chi Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Tzu Chi Medical Journal is the peer-reviewed publication of the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation, and includes original research papers on clinical medicine and basic science, case reports, clinical pathological pages, and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Epigenetic modification in radiotherapy and immunotherapy for cancers. Natural phytochemicals as small-molecule proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors. The obesity paradox exists in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of body mass index effects on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in Asia. Unraveling the interplay between inflammation and stem cell mobilization or homing: Implications for tissue repair and therapeutics. Evaluating the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy in the management of endophthalmitis after following the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1