Mixed Reality Improves 3D Visualization and Spatial Awareness of Bone Tumors for Surgical Planning in Orthopaedic Oncology: A Proof of Concept Study.

IF 1.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopedic Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/ORR.S421077
Kwok Chuen Wong, Edgar Yan Sun, Irene Oi Ling Wong, Shekhar Madhukar Kumta
{"title":"Mixed Reality Improves 3D Visualization and Spatial Awareness of Bone Tumors for Surgical Planning in Orthopaedic Oncology: A Proof of Concept Study.","authors":"Kwok Chuen Wong,&nbsp;Edgar Yan Sun,&nbsp;Irene Oi Ling Wong,&nbsp;Shekhar Madhukar Kumta","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S421077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In orthopedic oncology, computer navigation and 3D-printed guides facilitate precise osteotomies only after surgical exposure. Before surgeries start, it is challenging to mentally process and superimpose the virtual medical images onto patients' anatomy for preoperative surgical planning. Mixed Reality (MR) is an immersive technology merging real and virtual worlds, and users can interact with digital objects in real time. Through Head-Mounted Displays, surgeons directly visualize holographic models that overlaid on tumor patients. The technology may facilitate surgical planning before skin incisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine bone tumor patients were included (July 2021 - Dec 2022). There were six primary bone sarcomas, two benign bone tumors, and one revision pelvic prosthesis. MR applications were created using patients' preoperative medical images. The surgeon examined each patient clinically using the conventional method of viewing 2D images and MR via HMD, Hololens 2. A Likert-Scale (LS) questionnaire and The National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) score were used to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of surgical planning and the surgeon's clinical cognitive workload for the two methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qualitative survey of the LS questionnaire suggested that the MR group had superior spatial awareness of tumors and was considered more effective as a preoperative planning tool than the conventional group. For NASA-TLX scores, the overall cognitive workload was lower in MR 3D hologram group than in the 2D Group for preoperative clinical assessment. When using MR technology with HMDs, the surgeon reported no discomfort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MR technology may improve 3D visualization and spatial awareness of bone tumors in patients' anatomies and may facilitate surgical planning before skin incisions in orthopedic oncology surgery. With less cognitive load and better ergonomics, surgeons can focus on patients and surgical tasks with MR technology. Further studies must investigate whether MR technology improves clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"15 ","pages":"139-149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f0/50/orr-15-139.PMC10402726.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S421077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In orthopedic oncology, computer navigation and 3D-printed guides facilitate precise osteotomies only after surgical exposure. Before surgeries start, it is challenging to mentally process and superimpose the virtual medical images onto patients' anatomy for preoperative surgical planning. Mixed Reality (MR) is an immersive technology merging real and virtual worlds, and users can interact with digital objects in real time. Through Head-Mounted Displays, surgeons directly visualize holographic models that overlaid on tumor patients. The technology may facilitate surgical planning before skin incisions.

Methods: Nine bone tumor patients were included (July 2021 - Dec 2022). There were six primary bone sarcomas, two benign bone tumors, and one revision pelvic prosthesis. MR applications were created using patients' preoperative medical images. The surgeon examined each patient clinically using the conventional method of viewing 2D images and MR via HMD, Hololens 2. A Likert-Scale (LS) questionnaire and The National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) score were used to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of surgical planning and the surgeon's clinical cognitive workload for the two methods.

Results: The qualitative survey of the LS questionnaire suggested that the MR group had superior spatial awareness of tumors and was considered more effective as a preoperative planning tool than the conventional group. For NASA-TLX scores, the overall cognitive workload was lower in MR 3D hologram group than in the 2D Group for preoperative clinical assessment. When using MR technology with HMDs, the surgeon reported no discomfort.

Conclusion: MR technology may improve 3D visualization and spatial awareness of bone tumors in patients' anatomies and may facilitate surgical planning before skin incisions in orthopedic oncology surgery. With less cognitive load and better ergonomics, surgeons can focus on patients and surgical tasks with MR technology. Further studies must investigate whether MR technology improves clinical outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合现实改善骨肿瘤的三维可视化和空间意识,用于骨科肿瘤手术计划:概念验证研究。
导读:在骨科肿瘤学中,计算机导航和3d打印导板只有在手术暴露后才能实现精确的截骨。在手术开始前,如何在心理上处理并将虚拟医学图像叠加到患者的解剖结构上以进行术前手术计划是一个挑战。混合现实(MR)是一种融合真实世界和虚拟世界的沉浸式技术,用户可以实时与数字对象进行交互。通过头戴式显示器,外科医生可以直接看到覆盖在肿瘤患者身上的全息模型。这项技术可能有助于在皮肤切口前进行手术计划。方法:纳入9例骨肿瘤患者(2021年7月- 2022年12月)。有6例原发性骨肉瘤,2例良性骨肿瘤,1例盆腔修复假体。磁共振应用程序是根据患者术前医学图像创建的。外科医生使用常规方法通过HMD、Hololens 2查看2D图像和MR对每位患者进行临床检查。采用李克特量表(LS)和美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)评分来评估和比较两种方法的手术计划和外科医生临床认知负荷的有效性。结果:LS问卷的定性调查显示MR组对肿瘤的空间意识更强,作为术前规划工具比常规组更有效。对于NASA-TLX评分,术前临床评估MR 3D全息图组的整体认知负荷低于2D组。当使用磁共振技术与头戴式显示器时,外科医生报告没有不适。结论:MR技术可提高患者解剖骨肿瘤的三维可视化和空间意识,有助于骨科肿瘤手术皮肤切口前的手术规划。由于更少的认知负荷和更好的人体工程学,外科医生可以通过磁共振技术专注于患者和手术任务。进一步的研究必须调查核磁共振技术是否能改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedic Research and Reviews
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Research and Reviews is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the patho-physiology of the musculoskeletal system, trauma, surgery and other corrective interventions to restore mobility and function. Advances in new technologies, materials, techniques and pharmacological agents will be particularly welcome. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Patho-physiology and bioengineering, Technologies and materials science, Surgical techniques, including robotics, Trauma management and care, Treatment including pharmacological and non-pharmacological, Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinarian care approaches, Patient quality of life, satisfaction and preference, Health economic evaluations. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science and technology, clinical studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Outcome of Achilles Tendon Rupture Repaired by a Modified Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Suturing. Giant Granular Cell Tumor of the Left Thigh, a Rare Case Report and Literature Review. Reconstruction of the Tibial Stump After Fibulectomy. Current Status of Vertebral Body Tethering for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Umbrella Review. Injection of Amniotic Membrane and Umbilical Cord Particulate for Muscle and Ligament Tears in Collegiate Football Athletes: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1