Early hip fracture surgery is safe for patients on direct oral anticoagulants.

Nicholas L Kolodychuk, Brian Godshaw, Michael Nammour, Hunter Starring, James Mautner
{"title":"Early hip fracture surgery is safe for patients on direct oral anticoagulants.","authors":"Nicholas L Kolodychuk,&nbsp;Brian Godshaw,&nbsp;Michael Nammour,&nbsp;Hunter Starring,&nbsp;James Mautner","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine how preoperative direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use affects rates of blood transfusion, clinically important blood loss, and 30-day mortality in patients with hip fracture undergoing surgery within 48 hours of presentation to the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 535 patients with hip fracture who underwent open cephalomedullary nail fixation or arthroplasty either taking a direct oral anticoagulant or no form of chemical anticoagulant/antiplatelet agent before presentation (control).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Demographics, time to surgery, type of surgery, blood transfusion requirement, clinically important blood loss, and 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one patients (7.7%) were taking DOACs. DOAC patients were older (81.7 vs. 77 years, <i>P</i> = 0.02) and had higher BMI (26.9 vs. 24.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>P</i> = 0.01). Time from admission to surgery was similar between DOAC users (20.1 hours) and the control (18.7 hours, <i>P</i> > 0.4). There was no difference in receipt of blood transfusion (<i>P</i> = 0.4), major bleeding diagnosis (<i>P</i> = 0.2), acute blood loss anemia diagnosis (<i>P</i> = 0.5), and 30-day mortality (<i>P</i> = 1) between the DOAC and control group. This was true when stratifying by type of surgery as well.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that early surgery may be safe in patients with hip fracture taking DOACs despite theoretical risk of increased bleeding. Because early surgery has previously been associated with decreased morbidity and mortality, we suggest that hip fracture surgery should not be delayed because a patient is taking direct oral anticoagulants.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"6 2","pages":"e252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b7/6e/oi9-6-e252.PMC10079331.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: To determine how preoperative direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use affects rates of blood transfusion, clinically important blood loss, and 30-day mortality in patients with hip fracture undergoing surgery within 48 hours of presentation to the emergency department.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Academic trauma center.

Patients: A total of 535 patients with hip fracture who underwent open cephalomedullary nail fixation or arthroplasty either taking a direct oral anticoagulant or no form of chemical anticoagulant/antiplatelet agent before presentation (control).

Main outcome measures: Demographics, time to surgery, type of surgery, blood transfusion requirement, clinically important blood loss, and 30-day mortality.

Results: Forty-one patients (7.7%) were taking DOACs. DOAC patients were older (81.7 vs. 77 years, P = 0.02) and had higher BMI (26.9 vs. 24.2 kg/m2, P = 0.01). Time from admission to surgery was similar between DOAC users (20.1 hours) and the control (18.7 hours, P > 0.4). There was no difference in receipt of blood transfusion (P = 0.4), major bleeding diagnosis (P = 0.2), acute blood loss anemia diagnosis (P = 0.5), and 30-day mortality (P = 1) between the DOAC and control group. This was true when stratifying by type of surgery as well.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that early surgery may be safe in patients with hip fracture taking DOACs despite theoretical risk of increased bleeding. Because early surgery has previously been associated with decreased morbidity and mortality, we suggest that hip fracture surgery should not be delayed because a patient is taking direct oral anticoagulants.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期髋部骨折手术对直接口服抗凝剂的患者是安全的。
目的:确定术前直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)使用对髋部骨折患者就诊后48小时内输血率、临床重要失血量和30天死亡率的影响。设计:回顾性队列研究。单位:学术创伤中心。患者:共有535例髋部骨折患者接受开放头髓钉固定或关节置换术,在就诊前直接口服抗凝剂或未使用任何形式的化学抗凝/抗血小板药物(对照组)。主要结局指标:人口统计学、手术时间、手术类型、输血需求、临床重要失血量和30天死亡率。结果:41例(7.7%)患者服用了DOACs。DOAC患者年龄较大(81.7比77岁,P = 0.02), BMI较高(26.9比24.2 kg/m2, P = 0.01)。DOAC患者入院至手术时间(20.1小时)与对照组(18.7小时,P > 0.4)相似。DOAC组与对照组在输血次数(P = 0.4)、大出血诊断(P = 0.2)、急性失血性贫血诊断(P = 0.5)、30天死亡率(P = 1)方面均无差异。在按手术类型分层时也是如此。结论:我们的研究结果表明,尽管理论上存在出血增加的风险,但服用DOACs的髋部骨折患者的早期手术可能是安全的。由于早期手术与发病率和死亡率的降低有关,我们建议髋部骨折手术不应因为患者正在服用直接口服抗凝剂而推迟。证据等级:预后III级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Patient perspectives on the desirability of social worker support in outpatient orthopaedic trauma clinics. Tension band tendon-approximating cerclage for surgical fixation of patellar fractures: a novel surgical technique. Erratum: Comparison of the Neer classification to the 2018 update of the Orthopedic Trauma Association/AO fracture classification for classifying proximal humerus fractures: Erratum. Impact of fracture type on conversion to total hip arthroplasty following surgical repair of acetabular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma center proliferation in the United States: concerns and potential solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1