Toward a causal link between attachment styles and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL British Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2023-06-09 DOI:10.1111/bjc.12428
Laura M. Vowels, Matthew J. Vowels, Katherine B. Carnelley, Abigail Millings, Jilly Gibson-Miller
{"title":"Toward a causal link between attachment styles and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Laura M. Vowels,&nbsp;Matthew J. Vowels,&nbsp;Katherine B. Carnelley,&nbsp;Abigail Millings,&nbsp;Jilly Gibson-Miller","doi":"10.1111/bjc.12428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Recent research has shown that insecure attachment, especially attachment anxiety, is associated with poor mental health outcomes, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Other research suggests that insecure attachment may be linked to nonadherence to social distancing behaviours during the pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The present study aims to examine the causal links between attachment styles (secure, anxious, avoidant), mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety, loneliness) and adherence to social distancing behaviours during the first several months of the UK lockdown (between April and August 2020).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials &amp; Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used a nationally representative UK sample (cross-sectional <i>n</i> = 1325; longitudinal <i>n</i> = 950). The data were analysed using state-of-the-art causal discovery and targeted learning algorithms to identify causal processes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The results showed that insecure attachment styles were causally linked to poorer mental health outcomes, mediated by loneliness. Only attachment avoidance was causally linked to nonadherence to social distancing guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Future interventions to improve mental health outcomes should focus on mitigating feelings of loneliness. Limitations include no access to pre-pandemic data and the use of categorical attachment measure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Insecure attachment is a risk factor for poorer mental health outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjc.12428","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjc.12428","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

Recent research has shown that insecure attachment, especially attachment anxiety, is associated with poor mental health outcomes, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Other research suggests that insecure attachment may be linked to nonadherence to social distancing behaviours during the pandemic.

Aims

The present study aims to examine the causal links between attachment styles (secure, anxious, avoidant), mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety, loneliness) and adherence to social distancing behaviours during the first several months of the UK lockdown (between April and August 2020).

Materials & Methods

We used a nationally representative UK sample (cross-sectional n = 1325; longitudinal n = 950). The data were analysed using state-of-the-art causal discovery and targeted learning algorithms to identify causal processes.

Results

The results showed that insecure attachment styles were causally linked to poorer mental health outcomes, mediated by loneliness. Only attachment avoidance was causally linked to nonadherence to social distancing guidelines.

Discussion

Future interventions to improve mental health outcomes should focus on mitigating feelings of loneliness. Limitations include no access to pre-pandemic data and the use of categorical attachment measure.

Conclusion

Insecure attachment is a risk factor for poorer mental health outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨COVID-19大流行期间依恋方式与心理健康之间的因果关系
背景最近的研究表明,不安全的依恋,尤其是依恋焦虑,与不良的心理健康结果有关,尤其是在新冠肺炎大流行期间。其他研究表明,在疫情期间,不安全的依恋可能与不遵守社交距离行为有关。目的本研究旨在检验在英国封锁的前几个月(2020年4月至8月),依恋风格(安全、焦虑、回避型)、心理健康结果(抑郁、焦虑、孤独)和坚持社交距离行为之间的因果关系。材料&;方法我们使用了一个具有全国代表性的英国样本(横断面n = 1325;纵向n = 950)。使用最先进的因果发现和有针对性的学习算法对数据进行分析,以确定因果过程。结果研究结果表明,不安全的依恋方式与较差的心理健康结果有因果关系,这是由孤独感介导的。只有避免依恋与不遵守社交距离准则有因果关系。讨论未来改善心理健康结果的干预措施应侧重于减轻孤独感。限制包括无法获取疫情前的数据和使用分类依恋措施。结论不安全依恋是心理健康状况较差的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups
期刊最新文献
More than Body Appearance! Improving body image in young women through a functionality-focused intervention combined with psychoeducation: A randomized controlled trial. Issue Information Beliefs about emotions predict psychological stress related to somatic symptoms An investigation of the dual continua model of mental health in the context of eating disorder symptomatology using latent profile analysis Is your pain my pain? A study exploring the relation between pain sensitivity, pain thresholds and empathy for somatic and psychological pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1