Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Predicting Solid Pancreatic Lesions Using Strain Ratio and Elastography.

Kiran Bajaj, Taha Yaseen, Abbas Ali Tasneem, Syed Mudassir Laeeq, Ali Khalid, Nasir Hasan Luck, Nasir Mehmood, Sandeep Kumar, Muhammad Qaiser Panezai, Danish Kumar, Nadir Sattar, Nida Rasool, Reeaa Kumari
{"title":"Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Predicting Solid Pancreatic Lesions Using Strain Ratio and Elastography.","authors":"Kiran Bajaj,&nbsp;Taha Yaseen,&nbsp;Abbas Ali Tasneem,&nbsp;Syed Mudassir Laeeq,&nbsp;Ali Khalid,&nbsp;Nasir Hasan Luck,&nbsp;Nasir Mehmood,&nbsp;Sandeep Kumar,&nbsp;Muhammad Qaiser Panezai,&nbsp;Danish Kumar,&nbsp;Nadir Sattar,&nbsp;Nida Rasool,&nbsp;Reeaa Kumari","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advancement in imaging techniques, the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs) remains challenging. The latest advancement in elastography permits the quantitative measurements of the average elasticity of a lesion. Therefore, our main aim of this study was to determine the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided elastography (EUS-EG) and strain ratio (EUS-SR) in predicting SPLs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was performed at the Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation. All patients with radiological diagnosis of SPLs underwent EUS-EG, followed by strain ratio (SR) measurement and targeted pancreatic fine needle lesion biopsy (FNB). Area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was obtained for SR and combined elastography and SR and at an optimal cutoff, diagnostic accuracy was obtained in predicting the nature of SPLs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 patients were included in this study. Out of them, 32 (61.5%) patients were males while 20 (38.5%) were females. The mean age was 50.8 ± 12.5 years. Twenty-four (46.2%) patients had malignant pancreatic lesions. Among malignant lesions, the most common etiology was pancreatic adenocarcinoma seen in 18 (34.6%) patients. Out of 28 (53.8%) patients with benign lesions, 14 (26.9%) patients had inflammatory disease. Area under the receiver operating curve was obtained for both SR alone and SR combined with elastography score in differentiating benign from malignant SPLs which was 0.832 (<i>p</i>-value < 0.001) for SR alone and a slightly higher for combined SR with elastography (AUROC-0.839)(<i>p</i>-value < 0.001). At an optimal cutoff of SR of >17, the sensitivity was 94.8% and the diagnostic accuracy was 74% in predicting SPLs. While, when SR and elastography were combined together, the sensitivity increased to 96% with a diagnostic accuracy of 75%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined EUS-EG and SR were accurate in diagnosing malignant pancreatic lesions with a diagnostic accuracy of 75% providing additional diagnostics information before biopsy. However, multicentric studies with larger sample sizes are required for the validation of our results to determine the utility and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-SR in defining the characteristic of pancreatic lesions.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Bajaj K, Yaseen T, Tasneem AA, <i>et al</i>. Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Predicting Solid Pancreatic Lesions Using Strain Ratio and Elastography. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2023;13(1):1-4.</p>","PeriodicalId":11992,"journal":{"name":"Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology","volume":"13 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e6/2b/ejohg-13-1.PMC10405804.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite advancement in imaging techniques, the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs) remains challenging. The latest advancement in elastography permits the quantitative measurements of the average elasticity of a lesion. Therefore, our main aim of this study was to determine the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided elastography (EUS-EG) and strain ratio (EUS-SR) in predicting SPLs.

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was performed at the Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation. All patients with radiological diagnosis of SPLs underwent EUS-EG, followed by strain ratio (SR) measurement and targeted pancreatic fine needle lesion biopsy (FNB). Area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was obtained for SR and combined elastography and SR and at an optimal cutoff, diagnostic accuracy was obtained in predicting the nature of SPLs.

Results: A total of 52 patients were included in this study. Out of them, 32 (61.5%) patients were males while 20 (38.5%) were females. The mean age was 50.8 ± 12.5 years. Twenty-four (46.2%) patients had malignant pancreatic lesions. Among malignant lesions, the most common etiology was pancreatic adenocarcinoma seen in 18 (34.6%) patients. Out of 28 (53.8%) patients with benign lesions, 14 (26.9%) patients had inflammatory disease. Area under the receiver operating curve was obtained for both SR alone and SR combined with elastography score in differentiating benign from malignant SPLs which was 0.832 (p-value < 0.001) for SR alone and a slightly higher for combined SR with elastography (AUROC-0.839)(p-value < 0.001). At an optimal cutoff of SR of >17, the sensitivity was 94.8% and the diagnostic accuracy was 74% in predicting SPLs. While, when SR and elastography were combined together, the sensitivity increased to 96% with a diagnostic accuracy of 75%.

Conclusion: Combined EUS-EG and SR were accurate in diagnosing malignant pancreatic lesions with a diagnostic accuracy of 75% providing additional diagnostics information before biopsy. However, multicentric studies with larger sample sizes are required for the validation of our results to determine the utility and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-SR in defining the characteristic of pancreatic lesions.

How to cite this article: Bajaj K, Yaseen T, Tasneem AA, et al. Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Predicting Solid Pancreatic Lesions Using Strain Ratio and Elastography. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2023;13(1):1-4.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜超声在应用应变率和弹性成像预测胰腺实性病变中的作用。
背景:尽管成像技术取得了进步,但胰腺实性病变(SPLs)的诊断仍然具有挑战性。弹性成像的最新进展允许定量测量病变的平均弹性。因此,我们本研究的主要目的是确定内镜超声引导弹性成像(EUS-EG)和应变比(EUS-SR)在预测SPL中的作用。材料和方法:这项横断面研究在信德省泌尿外科和移植研究所肝胃肠病科进行。所有放射学诊断为SPLs的患者都接受了EUS-EG,然后进行应变比(SR)测量和靶向胰腺细针病变活检(FNB)。获得SR、弹性成像和SR的受试者工作曲线下面积(AUROC),在最佳截止点,预测SPLs的性质具有诊断准确性。结果:本研究共纳入52名患者。其中男性32例(61.5%),女性20例(38.5%)。平均年龄50.8±12.5岁。24例(46.2%)患者有胰腺恶性病变。在恶性病变中,最常见的病因是18例(34.6%)患者的胰腺癌。在28名(53.8%)良性病变患者中,14名(26.9%)患者患有炎症性疾病。在区分良性和恶性SPL方面,单独SR和SR联合弹性成像评分均获得了受试者工作曲线下面积,单独SR为0.832(p值<0.001),联合SR和弹性成像评分略高(AUROC-0.839)(p值<0.001),预测SPLs的敏感性为94.8%,诊断准确率为74%。而当SR和弹性成像结合在一起时,灵敏度提高到96%,诊断准确率达到75%。结论:联合EUS-EG和SR对胰腺恶性病变的诊断准确率为75%,为活检前提供了额外的诊断信息。然而,需要更大样本量的多中心研究来验证我们的结果,以确定EUS-SR在定义胰腺病变特征方面的实用性和诊断准确性。如何引用这篇文章:Bajaj K,Yaseen T,Tasneem AA,et al.内镜超声在使用应变率和弹性成像预测胰腺实性病变中的作用。Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2023;13(1):1-4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Scientific Insights for Drug Development Based on Normal Habitat of Tribal Population of Manipur: An Observational Study Regarding the Implication of “Houttuynia cordata” Can the Inflammatory Cell Ratio NLR and PLR be Used as a Reliable Marker in Colon Cancer? A Prospective Study Memories of Professor HASAN Ozkan: Blowing in the Wind The Journal Moving to an Adult State The Hooking Technique for Retrograde Freehand Access during Direct Cholangioscopy (with Video).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1