Can neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio, prognostic nutrition index, and albumin be used to predict cholecystectomy morbidity in super-elderly patients?
{"title":"Can neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio, prognostic nutrition index, and albumin be used to predict cholecystectomy morbidity in super-elderly patients?","authors":"Murat Kartal, Tolga Kalaycı","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2023.31462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the usability of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and serum albumin level in predicting cholecystectomy morbidity in elderly patients (85 years and older) who underwent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included super-elderly patients who underwent cholecystectomy due to acute cholecystitis at a tertiary health centre between January 2010 and January 2021. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of postoperative complications (morbidity). The differences between the two groups were evaluated. In addition, the role of NLR, PLR, PNI, and serum albumin level in predicting cholecystectomy morbidity for acute cholecystitis in super-elderly patients was assessed via ROC analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 30 patients who met the study criteria, 22 (73.3%) were female, and the mean age of all patients was 87.43±2.66 years (range 85-94 years). 7 (23.3%) patients had at least one comorbid disease during the preoperative period. The mean value of NLR, PLR, albumin, and PNI were 8.31, 153.76, 3.45, and 48.37, respectively. The morbidity rate of the study was 23.3%. The area under the curve (AUC) for NLR was 0.466 ([95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.259-0.672]; P=0.787), and the AUC for PLR was 0.429 ([95% CI: 0.201-0.656]; P=0.573). These two factors were not suitable for predicting morbidity. The AUC for PNI was 0.780 ([95% CI: 0.568-0.991]; P=0.027), and the AUC for albumin was 0.894 ([95% CI: 0.770-1.000]; P=0.002). At the cut-off value of 3.05 g/dL, the sensitivity and specificity of albumin were 91.3% and 71.4%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of PNI at the 41.70 cut-off value were 82.6% and 71.4%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that PNI and albumin can be used as predictive factors with high sensitivity and specificity for predicting cholecystectomy morbidity for acute cholecystitis in super-elderly patients. However, NLR and PLR had no significance in predicting cholecystectomy morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49398,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery","volume":"29 8","pages":"890-896"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/37/16/TJTES-29-890.PMC10560801.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.31462","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the usability of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and serum albumin level in predicting cholecystectomy morbidity in elderly patients (85 years and older) who underwent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.
Methods: This retrospective study included super-elderly patients who underwent cholecystectomy due to acute cholecystitis at a tertiary health centre between January 2010 and January 2021. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of postoperative complications (morbidity). The differences between the two groups were evaluated. In addition, the role of NLR, PLR, PNI, and serum albumin level in predicting cholecystectomy morbidity for acute cholecystitis in super-elderly patients was assessed via ROC analysis.
Results: Of 30 patients who met the study criteria, 22 (73.3%) were female, and the mean age of all patients was 87.43±2.66 years (range 85-94 years). 7 (23.3%) patients had at least one comorbid disease during the preoperative period. The mean value of NLR, PLR, albumin, and PNI were 8.31, 153.76, 3.45, and 48.37, respectively. The morbidity rate of the study was 23.3%. The area under the curve (AUC) for NLR was 0.466 ([95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.259-0.672]; P=0.787), and the AUC for PLR was 0.429 ([95% CI: 0.201-0.656]; P=0.573). These two factors were not suitable for predicting morbidity. The AUC for PNI was 0.780 ([95% CI: 0.568-0.991]; P=0.027), and the AUC for albumin was 0.894 ([95% CI: 0.770-1.000]; P=0.002). At the cut-off value of 3.05 g/dL, the sensitivity and specificity of albumin were 91.3% and 71.4%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of PNI at the 41.70 cut-off value were 82.6% and 71.4%, respectively.
Conclusion: This study found that PNI and albumin can be used as predictive factors with high sensitivity and specificity for predicting cholecystectomy morbidity for acute cholecystitis in super-elderly patients. However, NLR and PLR had no significance in predicting cholecystectomy morbidity.
期刊介绍:
The Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (TJTES) is an official publication of the Turkish Association of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. It is a double-blind and peer-reviewed periodical that considers for publication clinical and experimental studies, case reports, technical contributions, and letters to the editor. Scope of the journal covers the trauma and emergency surgery.
Each submission will be reviewed by at least two external, independent peer reviewers who are experts in their fields in order to ensure an unbiased evaluation process. The editorial board will invite an external and independent reviewer to manage the evaluation processes of manuscripts submitted by editors or by the editorial board members of the journal. The Editor in Chief is the final authority in the decision-making process for all submissions.