Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI.

IF 3.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Echo Research and Practice Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1530/ERP-20-0009
Vasiliki Tsampasian, Vasileios Panoulas, Richard J Jabbour, Neil Ruparelia, Iqbal S Malik, Nearchos Hadjiloizou, Angela Frame, Sayan Sen, Nilesh Sutaria, Ghada W Mikhail, Petros Nihoyannopoulos
{"title":"Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI.","authors":"Vasiliki Tsampasian,&nbsp;Vasileios Panoulas,&nbsp;Richard J Jabbour,&nbsp;Neil Ruparelia,&nbsp;Iqbal S Malik,&nbsp;Nearchos Hadjiloizou,&nbsp;Angela Frame,&nbsp;Sayan Sen,&nbsp;Nilesh Sutaria,&nbsp;Ghada W Mikhail,&nbsp;Petros Nihoyannopoulos","doi":"10.1530/ERP-20-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess left ventricular (LV) function before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using conventional echocardiographic parameters and global longitudinal LV strain (GLS) and compare outcomes between Edwards S3 and Evolut R valves.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Data were collected for consecutive patients undergoing TAVI at Hammersmith hospital between 2015 and 2018. Of the 303 patients, those with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation were excluded leading to a total of 85 patients, which constituted our study group. The mean follow-up was 49 ± 39 days. In total, 60% of patients were treated with Edwards S3 and 40% Evolut R. TAVI resulted in an early improvement of GLS (-13.96 to -15.25%, P = 0.01) but not ejection fraction (EF) (47.6 to 50.1%, P = 0.09). LV mass also improved, especially in patients with marked baseline LV hypertrophy (P < 0.001). There were no appreciable differences of LV function improvement and overall LV remodelling after TAVI between the two types of valves used (P = 0.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAVI results in reverse remodelling and improvement of GLS, especially in patients with impaired baseline LV function. There were no differences in the extent of LV function improvement between Edwards S3 and Evolut R valves but there was a greater incidence of aortic regurgitation with Evolut R.</p>","PeriodicalId":45749,"journal":{"name":"Echo Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/b8/ERP-20-0009.PMC7487179.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Echo Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-20-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aims: To assess left ventricular (LV) function before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using conventional echocardiographic parameters and global longitudinal LV strain (GLS) and compare outcomes between Edwards S3 and Evolut R valves.

Methods and results: Data were collected for consecutive patients undergoing TAVI at Hammersmith hospital between 2015 and 2018. Of the 303 patients, those with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation were excluded leading to a total of 85 patients, which constituted our study group. The mean follow-up was 49 ± 39 days. In total, 60% of patients were treated with Edwards S3 and 40% Evolut R. TAVI resulted in an early improvement of GLS (-13.96 to -15.25%, P = 0.01) but not ejection fraction (EF) (47.6 to 50.1%, P = 0.09). LV mass also improved, especially in patients with marked baseline LV hypertrophy (P < 0.001). There were no appreciable differences of LV function improvement and overall LV remodelling after TAVI between the two types of valves used (P = 0.14).

Conclusions: TAVI results in reverse remodelling and improvement of GLS, especially in patients with impaired baseline LV function. There were no differences in the extent of LV function improvement between Edwards S3 and Evolut R valves but there was a greater incidence of aortic regurgitation with Evolut R.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TAVI前后左心室斑点跟踪超声心动图评价。
目的:利用常规超声心动图参数和左室纵向应变(GLS)评价经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)前后左室功能,并比较Edwards S3和Evolut R瓣膜的效果。方法与结果:收集2015年至2018年在Hammersmith医院连续接受TAVI的患者的数据。303例患者中,排除冠状动脉疾病和心房颤动患者,共85例患者构成我们的研究组。平均随访时间为49±39天。总的来说,60%的患者接受Edwards S3治疗,40%的患者接受Evolut r治疗。TAVI导致GLS的早期改善(-13.96 ~ -15.25%,P = 0.01),但没有射血分数(EF) (47.6 ~ 50.1%, P = 0.09)。左室质量也有所改善,特别是基线左室肥厚明显的患者(P < 0.001)。两种瓣膜在TAVI后左室功能改善和整体左室重构方面无明显差异(P = 0.14)。结论:TAVI可导致GLS的反向重构和改善,特别是在基线左室功能受损的患者中。Edwards S3和Evolut R瓣膜在左室功能改善程度上没有差异,但Evolut R瓣膜的主动脉反流发生率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Echo Research and Practice
Echo Research and Practice CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
11
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Echo Research and Practice aims to be the premier international journal for physicians, sonographers, nurses and other allied health professionals practising echocardiography and other cardiac imaging modalities. This open-access journal publishes quality clinical and basic research, reviews, videos, education materials and selected high-interest case reports and videos across all echocardiography modalities and disciplines, including paediatrics, anaesthetics, general practice, acute medicine and intensive care. Multi-modality studies primarily featuring the use of cardiac ultrasound in clinical practice, in association with Cardiac Computed Tomography, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance or Nuclear Cardiology are of interest. Topics include, but are not limited to: 2D echocardiography 3D echocardiography Comparative imaging techniques – CCT, CMR and Nuclear Cardiology Congenital heart disease, including foetal echocardiography Contrast echocardiography Critical care echocardiography Deformation imaging Doppler echocardiography Interventional echocardiography Intracardiac echocardiography Intraoperative echocardiography Prosthetic valves Stress echocardiography Technical innovations Transoesophageal echocardiography Valve disease.
期刊最新文献
A proposal of a simplified grading and echo-based staging of aortic valve stenosis to streamline management. Left atrial volume assessed by echocardiography identifies patients with high risk of adverse outcome after acute myocardial infarction. Deep learning of echocardiography distinguishes between presence and absence of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Improvements of right ventricular function after intervention with CPAP in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. Cardiac ultrasomics for acute myocardial infarction risk stratification and prediction of all-cause mortality: a feasibility study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1