Infants’ responses to masked and unmasked smiling faces: A longitudinal investigation of social interaction during Covid-19

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Infant Behavior & Development Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101873
Marina Kammermeier, Markus Paulus
{"title":"Infants’ responses to masked and unmasked smiling faces: A longitudinal investigation of social interaction during Covid-19","authors":"Marina Kammermeier,&nbsp;Markus Paulus","doi":"10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>During the COVID-19 pandemic, face masks became an effective hygienic measure to reduce infection rates. Given the relevance of facial expressions for social interactions, the question arises how face masks affect early social interactions. The current longitudinal study investigated how covering parts of the face might impact infants’ responses to others’ emotional expressions. Infants who were born during the pandemic were examined at three measurement points at the age of 6, 10 and 14 months. After displaying a neutral facial expression an experimenter smiled at infants while either wearing a mask (mask condition) or not wearing a mask (no mask condition). Infants’ change in affect (i.e., negative, neutral, positive) from the neutral to the test phase (i.e., smiling experimenter) was evaluated. Results showed that at 6 and </span>at 10<span> months infants’ behavior did not differ between conditions, whereas at 14 months infants were more likely to show a change from neutral/negative affect to positive affect in the no mask condition than in the mask condition. Moreover, at 14 months infants were less likely to respond positively to the experimenter’s smile (across conditions) than at 6 and at 10 months. These findings broaden our understanding of potential effects of mask wearing on the development of face processing and affective communication. Overall, they indicate a developmental trend according to which infants’ processing and response to others’ positive emotions becomes more selective and differentiated with increasing age.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48222,"journal":{"name":"Infant Behavior & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Behavior & Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638323000656","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, face masks became an effective hygienic measure to reduce infection rates. Given the relevance of facial expressions for social interactions, the question arises how face masks affect early social interactions. The current longitudinal study investigated how covering parts of the face might impact infants’ responses to others’ emotional expressions. Infants who were born during the pandemic were examined at three measurement points at the age of 6, 10 and 14 months. After displaying a neutral facial expression an experimenter smiled at infants while either wearing a mask (mask condition) or not wearing a mask (no mask condition). Infants’ change in affect (i.e., negative, neutral, positive) from the neutral to the test phase (i.e., smiling experimenter) was evaluated. Results showed that at 6 and at 10 months infants’ behavior did not differ between conditions, whereas at 14 months infants were more likely to show a change from neutral/negative affect to positive affect in the no mask condition than in the mask condition. Moreover, at 14 months infants were less likely to respond positively to the experimenter’s smile (across conditions) than at 6 and at 10 months. These findings broaden our understanding of potential effects of mask wearing on the development of face processing and affective communication. Overall, they indicate a developmental trend according to which infants’ processing and response to others’ positive emotions becomes more selective and differentiated with increasing age.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婴儿对戴面具和不戴面具的笑脸的反应:Covid-19期间社会互动的纵向调查
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,戴口罩成为降低感染率的有效卫生措施。考虑到面部表情与社交互动的相关性,问题就出现了,面具是如何影响早期社交互动的。目前的纵向研究调查了遮住部分面部可能会如何影响婴儿对他人情绪表达的反应。对大流行期间出生的婴儿在6、10和14个月大时的三个测量点进行了检查。在展示了一个中性的面部表情后,实验者在戴口罩(戴口罩条件)和不戴口罩(不戴口罩条件)的情况下对婴儿微笑。评估了婴儿从中性到测试阶段(即微笑实验者)的情感变化(即消极、中立、积极)。结果表明,在6个月和10个月时,婴儿的行为在不同的条件下没有差异,而在14个月时,婴儿在无面具条件下比在面具条件下更有可能表现出从中性/消极情绪到积极情绪的变化。此外,14个月大的婴儿比6个月和10个月大的婴儿更不可能对实验者的微笑做出积极的反应。这些发现拓宽了我们对戴口罩对面部处理和情感交流发展的潜在影响的理解。总体而言,它们表明婴儿对他人积极情绪的处理和反应随着年龄的增长而变得更具选择性和分化的发展趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infant Behavior & Development
Infant Behavior & Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Infant Behavior & Development publishes empirical (fundamental and clinical), theoretical, methodological and review papers. Brief reports dealing with behavioral development during infancy (up to 3 years) will also be considered. Papers of an inter- and multidisciplinary nature, for example neuroscience, non-linear dynamics and modelling approaches, are particularly encouraged. Areas covered by the journal include cognitive development, emotional development, perception, perception-action coupling, motor development and socialisation.
期刊最新文献
Predicting language outcomes at 3 years using individual differences in morphological segmentation in infancy Toddlers' sensitivity to segmental and suprasegmental mispronunciations of familiar words Exploring the role of home play and learning activities in socioemotional development at 36-months: Findings from a large birth cohort study Generalizability and representation in studies of infant perceptual narrowing: Considerations for future research Infant and parent heart rates during a babywearing procedure: Evidence for autonomic coregulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1