Effect of biological variation in HbA1c and blood glucose on the diagnosis of prediabetes

IF 2.7 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Pub Date : 2023-07-26 DOI:10.1002/edm2.442
James M. Hempe, Shengping Yang, Daniel S. Hsia
{"title":"Effect of biological variation in HbA1c and blood glucose on the diagnosis of prediabetes","authors":"James M. Hempe,&nbsp;Shengping Yang,&nbsp;Daniel S. Hsia","doi":"10.1002/edm2.442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>People with a low or high haemoglobin glycation index (HGI) have lower or higher HbA1c than other people with the same FPG. This study compared the prevalence of prediabetes based on FPG, 2hOGTT and HbA1c in people with low, moderate or high HGI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Prediabetes was diagnosed based on ADA cutpoints in 10,488 NHANES participants without self-reported diabetes. HGI was calculated as the difference between a participant's observed HbA1c and a predicted HbA1c where predicted HbA1c = 0.024 FPG + 3.1. Participants were divided into low (HGI &lt; −0.15%), moderate (HGI −0.15% to +0.15%) and high (HGI &gt; +0.15%) HGI subgroups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The prevalence of prediabetes was 42.4% based on FPG, 27.2% based on HbA1c and 17.2% based on 2hOGTT. FPG and HbA1c thus overdiagnosed prediabetes by 25.2% and 10.0%, respectively, compared to the OGTT gold standard. Prevalence was (1) similar in low, moderate and high HGI participants based on 2hOGTT, (2) highest in low HGI participants based on FPG, and (3) highest in high HGI participants based on HbA1c. Among participants with mismatched FPG and HbA1c, OGTT was normal in (1) 79.5% of participants with normal FPG but prediabetic HbA1c (mean HGI = +0.53%), and (2) 75.2% of participants with normal HbA1c but prediabetic FPG (mean HGI = −0.30%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>FPG overdiagnosed prediabetes in people with low HGI. HbA1c overdiagnosed prediabetes in people with high HGI. Clinical use of HGI could improve prediabetes diagnosis and help health care providers avoid inappropriate or delayed treatment of people with extremes of HGI.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36522,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edm2.442","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edm2.442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

People with a low or high haemoglobin glycation index (HGI) have lower or higher HbA1c than other people with the same FPG. This study compared the prevalence of prediabetes based on FPG, 2hOGTT and HbA1c in people with low, moderate or high HGI.

Methods

Prediabetes was diagnosed based on ADA cutpoints in 10,488 NHANES participants without self-reported diabetes. HGI was calculated as the difference between a participant's observed HbA1c and a predicted HbA1c where predicted HbA1c = 0.024 FPG + 3.1. Participants were divided into low (HGI < −0.15%), moderate (HGI −0.15% to +0.15%) and high (HGI > +0.15%) HGI subgroups.

Results

The prevalence of prediabetes was 42.4% based on FPG, 27.2% based on HbA1c and 17.2% based on 2hOGTT. FPG and HbA1c thus overdiagnosed prediabetes by 25.2% and 10.0%, respectively, compared to the OGTT gold standard. Prevalence was (1) similar in low, moderate and high HGI participants based on 2hOGTT, (2) highest in low HGI participants based on FPG, and (3) highest in high HGI participants based on HbA1c. Among participants with mismatched FPG and HbA1c, OGTT was normal in (1) 79.5% of participants with normal FPG but prediabetic HbA1c (mean HGI = +0.53%), and (2) 75.2% of participants with normal HbA1c but prediabetic FPG (mean HGI = −0.30%).

Conclusions

FPG overdiagnosed prediabetes in people with low HGI. HbA1c overdiagnosed prediabetes in people with high HGI. Clinical use of HGI could improve prediabetes diagnosis and help health care providers avoid inappropriate or delayed treatment of people with extremes of HGI.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HbA1c和血糖生物学变化对前驱糖尿病诊断的影响
引言血红蛋白糖化指数(HGI)低或高的人比其他FPG患者的HbA1c更低或更高。本研究比较了低、中或高HGI人群中基于FPG、2HGTT和HbA1c的糖尿病前期患病率。方法对10488名无糖尿病自我报告的NHANES参与者,根据ADA切点进行糖尿病前期诊断。HGI计算为参与者观察到的HbA1c和预测的HbA1c之间的差异,其中预测的HbAlc = 0.024 FPG + 3.1.参与者被分为低(HGI <; −0.15%)、中等(HGI−0.15%至+0.15%)和高(HGI >; +0.15%)HGI亚组。结果糖尿病前期的患病率以FPG为基础为42.4%,以HbA1c为基础为27.2%,以2OGTT为基础为17.2%。因此,与OGTT金标准相比,FPG和HbA1c分别高估了25.2%和10.0%的糖尿病前期。患病率(1)基于2hOGTT的低、中、高HGI参与者相似,(2)基于FPG的低HGI参与者最高,(3)基于HbA1c的高HGI与会者最高。在FPG和HbA1c不匹配的参与者中,(1)79.5%的FPG正常但糖尿病前期HbA1c的参与者OGTT正常(平均HGI = +0.53%)和(2)75.2%的HbA1c正常但糖尿病前期FPG(平均HGI = −0.30%)。结论FPG在低HGI人群中过度诊断为糖尿病前期。HbA1c过度诊断为高HGI人群的糖尿病前期。HGI的临床应用可以改善糖尿病前期的诊断,并帮助医疗保健提供者避免对患有极端HGI的人进行不适当或延迟的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Trends in Alzheimer's-Related Mortality Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients in the United States: 1999–2019 Association Between TyG-BMI Index and Hyperuricemia in Adult Women Issue Information The Role of Serum Free Fatty Acids in Endothelium-Dependent Microvascular Function Association of Albumin-To-Creatinine Ratio With Diabetic Retinopathy Among US Adults (NHANES 2009–2016)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1