The relationship between victim impact statements and judicial decision making: An archival analysis of sentencing outcomes.

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Law and Human Behavior Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1037/lhb0000535
Gena K Dufour, Marguerite Ternes, Veronica Stinson
{"title":"The relationship between victim impact statements and judicial decision making: An archival analysis of sentencing outcomes.","authors":"Gena K Dufour,&nbsp;Marguerite Ternes,&nbsp;Veronica Stinson","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Victim impact statements (VISs) are testimonies that convey the emotional, physical, and financial harm that victims have suffered as the result of a crime. Although VISs are often presented to the court at sentencing, it is unclear whether they impact judicial decisions regarding sentencing.</p><p><strong>Hypotheses: </strong>We did not have any formal a priori hypothesis but instead examined five research questions. The first two explored whether the relationship between the victim and the offender, as well as the type of crime, was associated with differences in the likelihood of VIS submission. The following two explored whether the presence of a VIS was associated with differences in sentencing outcomes (incarceration, probation, ancillary orders, parole eligibility). The final research question explored whether the number of VISs and the delivery format (oral vs. written) was associated with differences in sentencing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We coded and analyzed 1,332 sentencing rulings across Canada from 2016 to 2018 that included the phrase \"impact statement.\" We coded for 87 variables, including information about the VIS, the victims and offenders, crime type, and sentencing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, VISs are more likely to be delivered in cases in which the crime is more severe. Once we controlled for the type of crime, sentencing outcomes were unrelated to the presence of VISs. Sentences were longer when VISs were delivered orally than in written format and when more than one statement was submitted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The relationship between VISs and sentencing outcomes is closely tied to several extralegal factors and should be investigated further. This research offers insight into the mechanics of victim evidence at sentencing. The findings of this study have implications for lawyers, researchers, judges, victims, offenders, and other stakeholders in our legal systems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":"47 4","pages":"484-498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000535","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Victim impact statements (VISs) are testimonies that convey the emotional, physical, and financial harm that victims have suffered as the result of a crime. Although VISs are often presented to the court at sentencing, it is unclear whether they impact judicial decisions regarding sentencing.

Hypotheses: We did not have any formal a priori hypothesis but instead examined five research questions. The first two explored whether the relationship between the victim and the offender, as well as the type of crime, was associated with differences in the likelihood of VIS submission. The following two explored whether the presence of a VIS was associated with differences in sentencing outcomes (incarceration, probation, ancillary orders, parole eligibility). The final research question explored whether the number of VISs and the delivery format (oral vs. written) was associated with differences in sentencing outcomes.

Method: We coded and analyzed 1,332 sentencing rulings across Canada from 2016 to 2018 that included the phrase "impact statement." We coded for 87 variables, including information about the VIS, the victims and offenders, crime type, and sentencing outcomes.

Results: Overall, VISs are more likely to be delivered in cases in which the crime is more severe. Once we controlled for the type of crime, sentencing outcomes were unrelated to the presence of VISs. Sentences were longer when VISs were delivered orally than in written format and when more than one statement was submitted.

Conclusions: The relationship between VISs and sentencing outcomes is closely tied to several extralegal factors and should be investigated further. This research offers insight into the mechanics of victim evidence at sentencing. The findings of this study have implications for lawyers, researchers, judges, victims, offenders, and other stakeholders in our legal systems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被害人影响陈述与司法决策的关系:量刑结果档案分析。
目的:受害者影响陈述(VISs)是传达受害者因犯罪而遭受的情感、身体和经济伤害的证词。虽然在量刑时经常向法院提交vis,但尚不清楚它们是否会影响有关量刑的司法决定。假设:我们没有任何正式的先验假设,而是检查了五个研究问题。前两项研究探讨了受害者和罪犯之间的关系,以及犯罪类型,是否与VIS服从可能性的差异有关。接下来的两个研究探讨了VIS的存在是否与量刑结果(监禁、缓刑、辅助命令、假释资格)的差异有关。最后的研究问题探讨了vis的数量和交付形式(口头与书面)是否与量刑结果的差异有关。方法:我们对2016年至2018年加拿大各地包含“影响陈述”一词的1332项判决进行了编码和分析。我们编码了87个变量,包括VIS、受害者和罪犯、犯罪类型和量刑结果的信息。结果:总体而言,在犯罪更严重的情况下,vis更有可能被交付。一旦我们控制了犯罪类型,量刑结果与vis的存在无关。口头陈述的句子要比书面陈述的句子长,而且要提交一份以上的陈述。结论:vis与量刑结果的关系与几个法外因素密切相关,应进一步研究。这项研究提供了对量刑时受害者证据机制的深入了解。这项研究的结果对律师、研究人员、法官、受害者、罪犯和我们法律体系中的其他利益相关者都有影响。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Law and Human Behavior, the official journal of the American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association, is a multidisciplinary forum for the publication of articles and discussions of issues arising out of the relationships between human behavior and the law, our legal system, and the legal process. This journal publishes original research, reviews of past research, and theoretical studies from professionals in criminal justice, law, psychology, sociology, psychiatry, political science, education, communication, and other areas germane to the field.
期刊最新文献
The state of open science in the field of psychology and law. The Miranda penalty: Inferring guilt from suspects' silence. Comparing predictive validity of Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory scores in Indigenous and non-Indigenous Canadian youth. Regional gender bias and year predict gender representation on civil trial teams. Lived experiences of bias in compensation and reintegration associated with false admissions of guilt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1