Does an educational website improve psychological outcomes and satisfaction among family members of intensive care unit patients?

Tarissa da Silva Ribeiro Haack, Regis Goulart Rosa, Cassiano Teixeira, Daniel Sganzerla, Caroline Cabral Robinson, Cláudia Severgnini Eugênio, Cleidilene Ramos Magalhães
{"title":"Does an educational website improve psychological outcomes and satisfaction among family members of intensive care unit patients?","authors":"Tarissa da Silva Ribeiro Haack, Regis Goulart Rosa, Cassiano Teixeira, Daniel Sganzerla, Caroline Cabral Robinson, Cláudia Severgnini Eugênio, Cleidilene Ramos Magalhães","doi":"10.5935/2965-2774.20230113-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of an educational website on satisfaction and symptoms of anxiety and depression among family members of critically ill adult patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We embedded an analysis of website access in a cohort study conducted in intensive care units with flexible visiting hours in Brazil. Family members were guided to access an educational website designed to help them understand the processes and emotions associated with an intensive care unit stay. Subjects were evaluated for baseline data within the first 48 hours following enrollment and outcome assessment at up to 7 days after patient discharge from the intensive care unit, death, or until the 30th day of the study. The main outcomes were satisfaction using the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory and the presence of anxiety and depression symptoms using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 532 family members were evaluated during the study period. Of these, 61 (11.5%) accessed the website. After adjustments, family members who accessed the website had significantly better mean Critical Care Family Needs Inventory scores (152.8 versus 145.2, p = 0.01) and a lower prevalence of probable clinical anxiety (prevalence ratio 0.35; 95%CI 0.14 - 0.89) than family members who did not access the website. There were no differences regarding symptoms of depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Access to an educational website was associated with higher family satisfaction with care and a lower prevalence of clinical anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2965-2774.20230113-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of an educational website on satisfaction and symptoms of anxiety and depression among family members of critically ill adult patients.

Methods: We embedded an analysis of website access in a cohort study conducted in intensive care units with flexible visiting hours in Brazil. Family members were guided to access an educational website designed to help them understand the processes and emotions associated with an intensive care unit stay. Subjects were evaluated for baseline data within the first 48 hours following enrollment and outcome assessment at up to 7 days after patient discharge from the intensive care unit, death, or until the 30th day of the study. The main outcomes were satisfaction using the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory and the presence of anxiety and depression symptoms using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

Results: A total of 532 family members were evaluated during the study period. Of these, 61 (11.5%) accessed the website. After adjustments, family members who accessed the website had significantly better mean Critical Care Family Needs Inventory scores (152.8 versus 145.2, p = 0.01) and a lower prevalence of probable clinical anxiety (prevalence ratio 0.35; 95%CI 0.14 - 0.89) than family members who did not access the website. There were no differences regarding symptoms of depression.

Conclusion: Access to an educational website was associated with higher family satisfaction with care and a lower prevalence of clinical anxiety.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育网站能否改善重症监护室患者家属的心理结果和满意度?
目的: 评估教育网站对成年重症患者家属的满意度以及焦虑和抑郁症状的影响:评估教育网站对成年重症患者家属的满意度以及焦虑和抑郁症状的影响:我们在一项队列研究中对网站访问情况进行了分析,该研究在巴西的重症监护病房进行,探视时间灵活。在指导下,家属访问了一个教育网站,该网站旨在帮助他们了解与重症监护病房住院相关的过程和情绪。受试者在入组后的 48 小时内接受基线数据评估,并在患者从重症监护病房出院后的 7 天内、死亡后或研究进行到第 30 天时接受结果评估。主要结果是重症监护家庭需求量表的满意度和医院焦虑抑郁量表的焦虑抑郁症状:在研究期间,共有 532 名家庭成员接受了评估。结果:在研究期间,共有 532 名家庭成员接受了评估,其中 61 人(11.5%)访问了网站。经过调整后,与未访问网站的家庭成员相比,访问网站的家庭成员的重症监护家庭需求量表平均得分明显更高(152.8 分对 145.2 分,P = 0.01),可能的临床焦虑患病率也更低(患病率比为 0.35;95%CI 为 0.14 - 0.89)。在抑郁症状方面没有差异:结论:访问教育网站可提高家人对护理的满意度,降低临床焦虑的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association between hair cortisol concentration and acute stress symptoms in family members of critically ill patients: a cross-sectional study. Reply to: Factors associated with mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome due to COVID-19 evolution. Advancing insights in critical COVID-19: unraveling lymphopenia through propensity score matching - Findings from the Multicenter LYMPH-COVID Study. Daily Chlorhexidine Bath for Health Care Associated Infection Prevention (CLEAN-IT): protocol for a multicenter cluster randomized crossover open-label trial. Reply to: Neurocritical care management supported by multimodal brain monitoring after acute brain injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1