Women-only versus mixed-gender groups in multimodal, day clinic treatment of trauma-related disorders.

Anke Philipps, Tobias Hepp, Andrea Silbermann, Eva Morawa, Mark Stemmler, Yesim Erim
{"title":"Women-only versus mixed-gender groups in multimodal, day clinic treatment of trauma-related disorders.","authors":"Anke Philipps,&nbsp;Tobias Hepp,&nbsp;Andrea Silbermann,&nbsp;Eva Morawa,&nbsp;Mark Stemmler,&nbsp;Yesim Erim","doi":"10.13109/zptm.2022.68.4.378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In the German healthcare system benefits include inpatient and day clinic psychotherapy of trauma-related disorders, which are often provided in gender specific groups. Despite this widespread practice, the actual impact and potential outcome have been studied relatively scarcely and are still open to debate. The present study therefore examines whether the therapeutic relationships in the group vary depending on the group composition and whether this has an effect on therapy outcome. <b>Methods:</b> 66 patients (N = 55 women) were treated in our multimodal, day clinic groupbased treatment program and filled out symptom questionnaires (ETI, BDI-II, PHQ-15, Questionnaire on social support) at admission and discharge and the Group Questionnaire (GQ; including subscales positive bonding, positive working and negative relationships) at the end of each of the eight weeks of treatment. Patients took part in five women-only and six mixed-gender groups and underwent therapy in a closed group format, so that they began and ended therapy within the same group. All patients were diagnosed with trauma-related disorders, which included PTSD, cPTSD, depression, somatoform disorders and further mental diseases. Outcome data were examined using functional regression analysis and linear mixed models. <b>Results:</b> In women-only groups, positive bonding and positive working relationship were significantly higher than in mixed-gender groups. Negative relationship ratings were significantly lower in women-only groups, especially in the middle phase of treatment. However, no effect of an exclusively female group composition on treatment outcome was found, except for the higher increase of perceived social support for patients treated in women-only groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> Group relationships were considered more pleasant in women-only groups than in mixed-gender groups, but this had no effect on the symptom-based therapy outcome. To enhance feelings of safety and comfort, traumatized women should have the possibility to choose whether to be treated in a women-only or a mixed-gender group.</p>","PeriodicalId":51217,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie","volume":"68 4","pages":"378-396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2022.68.4.378","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the German healthcare system benefits include inpatient and day clinic psychotherapy of trauma-related disorders, which are often provided in gender specific groups. Despite this widespread practice, the actual impact and potential outcome have been studied relatively scarcely and are still open to debate. The present study therefore examines whether the therapeutic relationships in the group vary depending on the group composition and whether this has an effect on therapy outcome. Methods: 66 patients (N = 55 women) were treated in our multimodal, day clinic groupbased treatment program and filled out symptom questionnaires (ETI, BDI-II, PHQ-15, Questionnaire on social support) at admission and discharge and the Group Questionnaire (GQ; including subscales positive bonding, positive working and negative relationships) at the end of each of the eight weeks of treatment. Patients took part in five women-only and six mixed-gender groups and underwent therapy in a closed group format, so that they began and ended therapy within the same group. All patients were diagnosed with trauma-related disorders, which included PTSD, cPTSD, depression, somatoform disorders and further mental diseases. Outcome data were examined using functional regression analysis and linear mixed models. Results: In women-only groups, positive bonding and positive working relationship were significantly higher than in mixed-gender groups. Negative relationship ratings were significantly lower in women-only groups, especially in the middle phase of treatment. However, no effect of an exclusively female group composition on treatment outcome was found, except for the higher increase of perceived social support for patients treated in women-only groups. Conclusions: Group relationships were considered more pleasant in women-only groups than in mixed-gender groups, but this had no effect on the symptom-based therapy outcome. To enhance feelings of safety and comfort, traumatized women should have the possibility to choose whether to be treated in a women-only or a mixed-gender group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多模式、日间门诊治疗创伤相关疾病的女性与混合性别组比较
背景:在德国医疗保健系统的好处包括住院和日间门诊心理治疗创伤相关障碍,这往往是在性别特定群体提供。尽管有这种广泛的做法,但对实际影响和潜在结果的研究相对较少,仍然存在争议。因此,本研究考察了组内的治疗关系是否因组组成而异,以及这是否对治疗结果有影响。方法:66例患者(55名女性)采用多模式日间门诊分组治疗方案,在入院和出院时填写症状问卷(ETI、BDI-II、PHQ-15、社会支持问卷)和分组问卷(GQ;包括积极的联系,积极的工作和消极的关系的亚量表)在每八周治疗结束时。患者参加了5个女性组和6个混合性别组,并以封闭的小组形式接受治疗,以便他们在同一组内开始和结束治疗。所有患者都被诊断患有创伤相关疾病,包括创伤后应激障碍、慢性创伤后应激障碍、抑郁症、躯体形式障碍和其他精神疾病。结果数据采用功能回归分析和线性混合模型进行检验。结果:纯女性组的积极结合和积极工作关系显著高于混合性别组。女性组的负面关系评分明显较低,尤其是在治疗的中期。然而,除了在女性组中治疗的患者感知到的社会支持增加更高外,没有发现纯女性组对治疗结果的影响。结论:纯女性组的群体关系被认为比混合性别组更愉快,但这对基于症状的治疗结果没有影响。为了增强安全感和舒适感,受创伤的妇女应该有机会选择是否在女性专用小组或混合性别小组接受治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal provides a systematic overview of the entire field of psychosomatic medicine. It is also the official organ of the German Society for Psychosomatic Medicine and Medical Psychotherapy (DGPM). It serves as a forum for discussions of the interdisciplinary experiences in the field of psychosomatics, the goal being the furtherance of scientific insights into the interactions between mental and physical factors in the development of disease. It also provides a way to deepen one´s knowledge of psychoanalysis and to explore new therapeutic directions.
期刊最新文献
Fragebogen zur Empirischen Untersuchung von Abwehrmechanismen (FEUA). Schweigen in der videobasierten Psychotherapie Eine Pilotstudie. Die Autorinnen und Autoren dieses Heftes. Editorial. Viele Wege führen zum Ziel – Therapieerfolg im Spiegel individueller Strukturen und systemischer Herausforderungen. Inhalt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1